跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确研究潜在结果比值定义的条件平均处理效应及观察数据中的双重稳健估计。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Steve Yadlowsky
Fabio Pellegrini
Federica Lionetto
Stefan Braune
Lu Tian

利用观察数据估计与验证比值型条件平均处理效应

研究问题
在观察数据中,如何估计以潜在结果期望之比定义的异质性处理效应,并避免回归误设产生虚假的处理交互?
方法与思路
作者在处理与协变量交互的半参数模型中构造比值型条件平均处理效应的双重稳健估计量,并设计独立样本验证。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称方法提供双重稳健估计与验证程序,并通过模拟及多发性硬化患者两种药物的比较展示有限样本表现。
阅读关注点
应核对观察数据下的因果识别条件、双重稳健性针对的模型,以及比值分母要求和独立样本验证所评价的目标。
阅读边界
仅据版本未注明的 OpenAlex 索引摘要解读;摘要未说明混杂控制条件、模型限制或治疗效果数值,不能判断因果可信度。

原文摘要

While sample sizes in randomized clinical trials are large enough to estimate the average treatment effect well, they are often insufficient for estimation of treatment-covariate interactions critical to studying data-driven precision medicine. Observational data from real world practice may play an important role in alleviating this problem. One common approach in trials is to predict the outcome of interest with separate regression models in each treatment arm, and estimate the treatment effect based on the contrast of the predictions. Unfortunately, this simple approach may induce spurious treatment-covariate interaction in observational studies when the regression model is misspecified. Motivated by the need of modeling the number of relapses in multiple sclerosis patients, where the ratio of relapse rates is a natural choice of the treatment effect, we propose to estimate the conditional average treatment effect (CATE) as the ratio of expected potential outcomes, and derive a doubly robust estimator of this CATE in a semiparametric model of treatment-covariate interactions. We also provide a validation procedure to check the quality of the estimator on an independent sample. We conduct simulations to demonstrate the finite sample performance of the proposed methods, and illustrate their advantages on real data by examining the treatment effect of dimethyl fumarate compared to teriflunomide in multiple sclerosis patients.

笔记与分组