跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究通用高维集成预测风险,未明确涉及宏观预测、金融收益预测或其他所列专门方向。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Takuya Koriyama
Pratik Patil
Jin-Hong Du
Kai Tan
Pierre C. Bellec

正则化M估计量装袋集成的精确渐近分析

研究问题
在样本数、特征数和子样本规模按固定比例增长时,如何刻画正则化M估计量子采样集成的预测风险与调参作用?
方法与思路
作者分析重叠子样本上估计误差与残差的联合相关行为,以可证明收缩的非线性方程系统刻画风险,并构造一致风险估计量。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称获得异质集成的平方预测风险刻画及一致估计,扩展自由度相关迹泛函结果,并揭示集成规模与子样本量的正则化作用。
阅读关注点
应核对比例渐近框架、损失与正则项条件,以及最优调参下风险单调性和联合优化优于仅调正则项的具体适用范围。
阅读边界
仅据版本未注明的OpenAlex摘要,数据分布与完整条件未说明;所述最优子样本和风险改善不能外推至任意有限样本。

原文摘要

We characterize the squared prediction risk of ensemble estimators obtained through subagging (subsample bootstrap aggregating) regularized M-estimators and construct a consistent estimator for the risk. Specifically, we consider a heterogeneous collection of M≥1 regularized M-estimators, each trained with (possibly different) subsample sizes, convex differentiable losses, and convex regularizers. We operate under the proportional asymptotics regime, where the sample size n, feature size p, and subsample sizes km for m∈[M] all diverge with fixed limiting ratios n/p and km/n. Key to our analysis is a new result on the joint asymptotic behavior of correlations between the estimator and residual errors on overlapping subsamples, governed through a (provably) contractive nonlinear system of equations. Of independent interest we also establish convergence of trace functionals related to degrees of freedom in the nonensemble setting (with M=1) along the way, extending previously known cases for squared loss with ridge and lasso regularizers. When specialized to homogeneous ensembles trained with a common loss, regularizer, and subsample size, the risk characterization sheds some light on the (implicitly) induced regularization effect due to the ensemble and subsample sizes (M,k). For any ensemble size M, optimally tuning subsample size yields samplewise monotonic risk. For the full-ensemble estimator (when M→∞), the optimal subsample size k⋆ tends to be in the overparameterized regime (k⋆≤min{n,p}), when explicit regularization is vanishing. Finally, joint optimization of subsample size, ensemble size, and regularization can significantly outperform regularizer optimization alone on the full data (without any subagging).

笔记与分组
相关领域论文