Precise asymptotics of bagging regularized M-estimators
正则化M估计量装袋集成的精确渐近分析AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究通用高维集成预测风险,未明确涉及宏观预测、金融收益预测或其他所列专门方向。
正则化M估计量装袋集成的精确渐近分析AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
We characterize the squared prediction risk of ensemble estimators obtained through subagging (subsample bootstrap aggregating) regularized M-estimators and construct a consistent estimator for the risk. Specifically, we consider a heterogeneous collection of M≥1 regularized M-estimators, each trained with (possibly different) subsample sizes, convex differentiable losses, and convex regularizers. We operate under the proportional asymptotics regime, where the sample size n, feature size p, and subsample sizes km for m∈[M] all diverge with fixed limiting ratios n/p and km/n. Key to our analysis is a new result on the joint asymptotic behavior of correlations between the estimator and residual errors on overlapping subsamples, governed through a (provably) contractive nonlinear system of equations. Of independent interest we also establish convergence of trace functionals related to degrees of freedom in the nonensemble setting (with M=1) along the way, extending previously known cases for squared loss with ridge and lasso regularizers. When specialized to homogeneous ensembles trained with a common loss, regularizer, and subsample size, the risk characterization sheds some light on the (implicitly) induced regularization effect due to the ensemble and subsample sizes (M,k). For any ensemble size M, optimally tuning subsample size yields samplewise monotonic risk. For the full-ensemble estimator (when M→∞), the optimal subsample size k⋆ tends to be in the overparameterized regime (k⋆≤min{n,p}), when explicit regularization is vanishing. Finally, joint optimization of subsample size, ensemble size, and regularization can significantly outperform regularizer optimization alone on the full data (without any subagging).