跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确将是否购买这一离散结果与访问行为及销售金额联合建模,因此最直接对应所给分类中的离散选择方向。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者

从亚马逊到苹果:在线零售销售、购买发生与访问行为建模

研究问题
作者研究如何联合刻画访问时长、浏览页数、是否购买和销售金额之间的非线性关联,并利用访问行为提高在线零售销售预测。
方法与思路
作者组合不同分布与 copula 构建多元随机模型,用最大似然估计;再以贝叶斯有限混合扩展刻画家庭异质性,并适配有限价格点。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称多个网站的验证中,购买发生与销售额预测优于所列回归、数据挖掘及生存模型,并发现访问变量与销售的关系因产品而异。
阅读关注点
阅读全文应核对边际分布与 copula 的选择、未购买时销售额的处理、潜在家庭分组的设定,以及验证样本划分和预测误差指标。
阅读边界
摘要未给出预测改善幅度、验证设计和不确定性评估;访问行为与销售的关联不能仅凭摘要作因果解释,也不足以确认预测优势的普遍性。

原文摘要

In this study, we propose a multivariate stochastic model for Web site visit duration, page views, purchase incidence, and the sale amount for online retailers. The model is constructed by composition from carefully selected distributions and involves copula components. It allows for the strong nonlinear relationships between the sales and visit variables to be explored in detail, and can be used to construct sales predictions. The model is readily estimated using maximum likelihood, making it an attractive choice in practice given the large sample sizes that are commonplace in online retail studies. We examine a number of top-ranked U.S. online retailers, and find that the visit duration and the number of pages viewed are both related to sales, but in very different ways for different products. Using Bayesian methodology, we show how the model can be extended to a finite mixture model to account for consumer heterogeneity via latent household segmentation. The model can also be adjusted to accommodate a more accurate analysis of online retailers like apple.com that sell products at a very limited number of price points. In a validation study across a range of different Web sites, we find that the purchase incidence and sales amount are both forecast more accurately using our model, when compared to regression, probit regression, a popular data-mining method, and a survival model employed previously in an online retail study. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文