跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要主要是稳定分布的通用推断,电价应用未明确涉及金融资产或系统性风险。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Jean-Marie Dufour
Lynda Khalaf

稳定分布的精确置信集合与拟合优度方法

研究问题
当稳定分布的常规渐近推断可能不可靠时,如何为尾厚度和不对称参数构造有限样本检验与置信集合?
方法与思路
作者反演指定α、β的精确拟合优度检验,扩展拟合与分位数统计量,以模拟近似假设量并通过蒙特卡洛检验计算p值。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称提出有限样本推断程序,模拟中样本量小至25仍得到可靠表现,并在美国日度电价中发现重尾与不对称。
阅读关注点
应核对精确性的抽样依据、其他参数的处理、模拟近似对检验的影响,以及置信集合反演和小样本评价标准。
阅读边界
仅据所给出版社摘要,无法判断精确性所需条件;样本量25的模拟表现不能推广到任意数据,电价结果也不能外推至其他市场。

原文摘要

Usual inference methods for stable distributions are typically based on limit distributions. But asymptotic approximations can easily be unreliable in such cases, for standard regularity conditions may not apply or may hold only weakly. This paper proposes finite-sample tests and confidence sets for tail thickness and asymmetry parameters (α and β) of stable distributions. The confidence sets are built by inverting exact goodness-of-fit tests for hypotheses which assign specific values to these parameters. We propose extensions of the Kolmogorov–Smirnov, Shapiro–Wilk and Filliben criteria, as well as the quantile-based statistics proposed by McCulloch (1986) in order to better capture tail behavior. The suggested criteria compare empirical goodness-of-fit or quantile-based measures with their hypothesized values. Since the distributions involved are quite complex and non-standard, the relevant hypothetical measures are approximated by simulation, and p-values are obtained using Monte Carlo (MC) test techniques. The properties of the proposed procedures are investigated by simulation. In contrast with conventional wisdom, we find reliable results with sample sizes as small as 25. The proposed methodology is applied to daily electricity price data in the US over the period 2001–2006. The results show clearly that heavy kurtosis and asymmetry are prevalent in these series.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文