跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要属于通用统计学习与函数逼近理论,未明确涉及所列经济计量应用细分。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Hongrui Chen
Jihao Long
Lei Wu

分析随机特征与双层神经网络的对偶框架

研究问题
如何在随机特征、双层神经网络和核方法相关函数空间中,将函数逼近与统计估计联系起来并刻画学习误差?
方法与思路
作者利用信息复杂性工具建立逼近与估计的对偶等价,引入I复杂性,并分析核范围之外的随机特征学习及一致范数学习。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,框架给出特定函数类的尖锐学习界与谱依赖误差刻画,并说明核岭回归在所研究一致范数学习中可接近最优。
阅读关注点
应核对函数空间与范数定义、对偶等价的条件、维数和谱依赖方式,以及有噪声与无噪声结果各自采用的误差准则。
阅读边界
所给为版本未注明的索引摘要,不能判断完整速率与常数;函数空间下标等数学排版需查原文,结论不可泛化到所有网络。

原文摘要

We consider the problem of learning functions within the Fp,π and Barron spaces, which play crucial roles in understanding random feature models (RFMs), two-layer neural networks as well as kernel methods. Leveraging tools from information-based complexity (IBC), we establish a dual equivalence between approximation and estimation and then apply it to study the learning of the preceding function spaces. The duality allows us to focus on the more tractable problem between approximation and estimation. To showcase the efficacy of our duality framework, we delve into two important but under-explored problems: (1) Random feature learning beyond kernel regime. We derive sharp bounds for learning Fp,π using RFMs. Notably, the learning is efficient without the curse of dimensionality for p>1. This underscores the extended applicability of RFMs beyond the traditional kernel regime, since Fp,π with p<2 is strictly larger than the corresponding reproducing kernel Hilbert space (RKHS) where p=2. (2) The L∞ learning of RKHS. We establish sharp, spectrum-dependent characterizations for the convergence of L∞ learning error in both noiseless and noisy settings. Surprisingly, we show that popular kernel ridge regression can achieve near-optimal performance in L∞ learning, despite it primarily minimizing square loss. To establish the aforementioned duality, we introduce a type of IBC, termed I-complexity, to measure the size of a function class. Notably, I-complexity offers a tight characterization of learning in noiseless settings, yields lower bounds comparable to Le Cam’s in noisy settings, and is versatile in deriving upper bounds. We believe that our duality framework holds potential for broad application in learning analysis across more scenarios.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文