跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要直接研究金融扩散的波动率函数及相关模型检验。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Jianqing Fan
Chunming Zhang

扩散估计量的重新审视及其在金融模型检验中的应用

研究问题
扩散模型的高阶近似是否改善漂移与扩散估计,短期利率漂移非线性及常用波动率模型又获得多强的数据支持?
方法与思路
作者推导估计量渐近偏差与方差公式,结合模拟研究近似阶数,并用一阶局部线性拟合及广义似然比检验评价金融模型。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称高阶近似减小近似偏差却使方差近乎指数增长;应用中反对线性漂移的证据较弱,反对部分波动率模型的证据较强。
阅读关注点
应核对近似阶数与采样间隔的渐近设定、边界处理、检验校准,以及利率和标普数据应用中的模型与样本范围。
阅读边界
摘要未给出渐近条件、样本设定或检验数值;局部线性法的模拟优势有范围限制,OpenAlex 索引版本未注明。

原文摘要

Time-homogeneous diffusion models have been widely used for describing the stochastic dynamics of the underlying economic variables. Recently, Stanton proposed drift and diffusion estimators based on a higher-order approximation scheme and kernel regression method. He claimed that “higher order approximations must outperform lower order approximations” and concluded nonlinearity in the instantaneous return function of short-term interest rates. To examine the impact of higher-order approximations, we develop general and explicit formulas for the asymptotic behavior of both drift and diffusion estimators. We show that these estimators will reduce the numerical approximation errors in asymptotic biases, but their asymptotic variances escalate nearly exponentially with the order of approximation. Simulation studies also confirm our asymptotic results. This variance inflation problem arises not only from nonparametric fitting, but also from parametric fitting. Stanton's work also postulates the interesting question of whether the short-term rate drift is nonlinear. Based on empirical simulation studies, Chapman and Pearson suggested that the nonlinearity might be spurious, due partially to the boundary effect of kernel regression. This prompts us to use the local linear fit based on the first-order approximation, proposed by Fan and Yao, to ameliorate the boundary effect and to construct formal tests of parametric financial models against the nonparametric alternatives. Our simulation results show that the local linear method indeed outperforms the kernel approach. Furthermore, our nonparametric “generalized likelihood ratio tests” are indeed versatile and powerful in detecting nonparametric alternatives. Using this formal testing procedure, we show that the evidence against the linear drift of the short-term interest rates is weak, whereas evidence against a family of popular models for the volatility function is very strong. Application to Standard & Poor 500 data is also illustrated.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文