跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究一般计算模型的输入敏感性,没有明确对应给定计量细分。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Jeremy E. Oakley
Anthony O'Hagan

复杂模型的概率敏感性分析:贝叶斯方法

研究问题
复杂计算模型的输入存在联合不确定性时,如何解释输入变化对输出的影响,并减少概率敏感性分析所需的模型运行次数?
方法与思路
作者以输入的联合概率分布刻画不确定性,提出统一多种概率敏感性分析工具的贝叶斯框架,用一组运行结果计算相关指标。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称该框架较标准蒙特卡洛方法可用更少模型运行实现有效分析,并能从同一组运行结果计算全部关注的敏感性指标。
阅读关注点
应核对贝叶斯模型、先验和运行点设计,确认敏感性指标的定义、输入依赖处理及计算效率比较的条件与误差标准。
阅读边界
摘要未说明具体贝叶斯构造、误差保障或运行次数;这里只解读所给 Crossref 摘要,不推断版本变化。

原文摘要

Summary In many areas of science and technology, mathematical models are built to simulate complex real world phenomena. Such models are typically implemented in large computer programs and are also very complex, such that the way that the model responds to changes in its inputs is not transparent. Sensitivity analysis is concerned with understanding how changes in the model inputs influence the outputs. This may be motivated simply by a wish to understand the implications of a complex model but often arises because there is uncertainty about the true values of the inputs that should be used for a particular application. A broad range of measures have been advocated in the literature to quantify and describe the sensitivity of a model's output to variation in its inputs. In practice the most commonly used measures are those that are based on formulating uncertainty in the model inputs by a joint probability distribution and then analysing the induced uncertainty in outputs, an approach which is known as probabilistic sensitivity analysis. We present a Bayesian framework which unifies the various tools of prob- abilistic sensitivity analysis. The Bayesian approach is computationally highly efficient. It allows effective sensitivity analysis to be achieved by using far smaller numbers of model runs than standard Monte Carlo methods. Furthermore, all measures of interest may be computed from a single set of runs.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文