跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要聚焦一般回归变量选择、收缩先验及方差分量,未明确涉及所列因果、面板、结构或金融方向。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
David J. Nott
Anthony Y. C. Kuk

基于系数符号预测的模型选择方法

研究问题
当模型选择主要服务于解释时,能否通过判断完整回归模型中系数正负号的可预测性,识别值得关注的变量?
方法与思路
作者提出贝叶斯系数符号预测策略,考虑层级收缩先验,并在方差分量选择中改用参数零点处得分分量的符号。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称方法仅需为完整模型指定先验,与Zheng–Loh程序存在联系,并在比较中表现出类似弹性网的组选择特征。
阅读关注点
应核对符号预测的决策标准、先验敏感性、高维及共线性情形下的表现,以及方差分量扩展与得分检验的具体关系。
阅读边界
仅据所给Crossref摘要。摘要未说明符号判断的阈值、错误控制或一致性条件,组选择特征也不能解释为普遍优于弹性网。

原文摘要

Summary We consider a Bayesian model selection strategy based on predicting the signs of the coefficients in a regression model, i.e. we consider identification of coefficients in a full or encompassing model for which we can confidently predict whether they are positive or negative. This is useful when our main purpose in doing model selection is interpretation, since the sign of a coefficient is often of primary importance for this task. In the case of a linear model with standard non-informative prior, we connect our sign coefficient prediction approach to the classical Zheng–Loh procedure for model selection. One advantage of our approach is that only specification of a prior on the full model is required, unlike standard Bayesian variable selection approaches which require specification of prior distributions on parameters in all submodels, and specification of a prior on the model itself. We consider applying our method with proper hierarchical shrinkage priors, which makes the procedure more useful in ‘large p, small n’ regression problems with more predictors than observations and in problems involving multicollinearity. In these problems we may wish to do prediction by using shrinkage methods in the full model, but interpreting which variables are important is also of interest. We compare selection by using our coefficient sign prediction approach with the recently proposed elastic net procedure of Zou and Hastie and observe that our method shares some of the features of the elastic net such as a group selection property. The method can be extended to more complex model selection problems such as selection on variance components in random-effects models. For selection on variance components where the parameter of interest is non-negative and hence prediction of the sign of the parameter not the appropriate way to proceed, we consider instead prediction of the sign of the score component for the parameter at zero, obtaining a method that is related to classical score tests on variance components.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文