Assessing Causal Effects in a Longitudinal Observational Study With “Truncated” Outcomes Due to Unemployment and Nonignorable Missing Data
失业导致结局截断及不可忽略缺失的纵向观察研究中的因果效应评估AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要围绕培训的因果效应以及个体就业、工资的纵向观测展开,直接对应因果推断和面板数据相关方法。
失业导致结局截断及不可忽略缺失的纵向观察研究中的因果效应评估AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Important statistical issues pervade the evaluation of training programs’ effects for unemployed people. In particular, the fact that offered wages are observed and well-defined only for subjects who are employed (truncation by death), and the problem that information on the individuals’ employment status and wage can be lost over time (attrition) raise methodological challenges for causal inference. We present an extended framework for simultaneously addressing the aforementioned problems, and thus answering important substantive research questions, in training evaluation observational studies with covariates, a binary treatment and longitudinal information on employment status and wage, which may be missing due to the lost to follow-up. There are two key features of this framework: we use principal stratification to properly define the causal effects of interest and to deal with nonignorable missingness, and we adopt a Bayesian approach for inference. The proposed framework allows us to answer an open issue in economics: the assessment of the trend of reservation wage over the duration of unemployment. We apply our framework to evaluate causal effects of foreign language training programs in Luxembourg, using administrative data on the labor force (IGSS-ADEM dataset). Our findings might be an incentive for the employment agencies to better design and implement future language training programs.