Stability Approach to Regularization Selection for Reduced-Rank Regression
降秩回归的正则化选择:稳定性方法AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
本页为预印本版本;arXiv 收录、作者填写的期刊信息以及作者既有发表经历,都不单独证明本篇已接收。作者发表记录按 OpenAlex 身份与完整姓名、本站覆盖期刊 ISSN 及正式卷期核对,只展示已核实例,档案仍可能误合并。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究通用降秩回归,未明确涉及宏观或金融因子模型,也未提供其他细分领域的充分依据。
降秩回归的正则化选择:稳定性方法AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
The reduced-rank regression model is a popular model to deal with multivariate response and multiple predictors, and is widely used in biology, chemometrics, econometrics, engineering, and other fields. In the reduced-rank regression modelling, a central objective is to estimate the rank of the coefficient matrix that represents the number of effective latent factors in predicting the multivariate response. Although theoretical results such as rank estimation consistency have been established for various methods, in practice rank determination still relies on information criterion based methods such as AIC and BIC or subsampling based methods such as cross validation. Unfortunately, the theoretical properties of these practical methods are largely unknown. In this paper, we present a novel method called StARS-RRR that selects the tuning parameter and then estimates the rank of the coefficient matrix for reduced-rank regression based on the stability approach. We prove that StARS-RRR achieves rank estimation consistency, i.e., the rank estimated with the tuning parameter selected by StARS-RRR is consistent to the true rank. Through a simulation study, we show that StARS-RRR outperforms other tuning parameter selection methods including AIC, BIC, and cross validation as it provides the most accurate estimated rank. In addition, when applied to a breast cancer dataset, StARS-RRR discovers a reasonable number of genetic pathways that affect the DNA copy number variations and results in a smaller prediction error than the other methods with a random-splitting process.