跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究连续时间序列的平稳性检验、不规则观测和混合采样频率。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Fabio Busetti
A.M. Robert Taylor

不规则间隔观测的平稳性检验及采样频率对功效的影响

研究问题
对于不规则或混合频率观测,存量与流量变量的平稳性检验有何区别,提高采样频率是否必然增加检验功效?
方法与思路
作者从连续时间局部水平不可观测成分模型推导局部最优不变检验,分析规则及混频观测,并研究频率与功效关系。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,提高采样频率会增加存量检验的渐近局部功效,但流量情形不同;固定跨度下的一致性也存在同样区别。
阅读关注点
应核对存量与流量的观测方程、固定跨度和频率趋增的渐近设定,以及混频临界值与忽略期内信息的效率损失。
阅读边界
仅据所给出版社摘要,无法判断具体模型条件和功效差异幅度;采样频率提高的收益不能从存量直接推广到流量。

原文摘要

In this article, starting from continuous-time local level unobserved components models for stock and flow data we derive locally best invariant (LBI) stationarity tests for data available at potentially irregularly spaced points in time. We demonstrate that the form of the LBI test differs between stock and flow variables. In cases where the data are observed at regular intervals throughout the sample we show that the LBI tests for stock and flow data both reduce to the form of the standard stationarity test in the discrete-time local level model. Here we also show that the asymptotic local power of the LBI test increases with the sampling frequency in the case of stock, but not flow, variables. Moreover, for a fixed time span we show that the LBI test for stock (flow) variables is (is not) consistent against a fixed alternative as the sampling frequency increases to infinity. We also consider the case of mixed frequency data in some detail, providing asymptotic critical values for the LBI tests for both stock and flow variables, together with a finite-sample power study. Our results suggest that tests that ignore the infraperiod aspect of the data involve rather small losses in efficiency relative to the LBI test in the case of flow variables but can result in significant losses of efficiency when analyzing stock variables.We are grateful to co-editor Jeff Wooldrige, two anonymous referees, Marcus Chambers, Andrew Harvey, Rod McCrorie, Neil Shephard, and seminar participants at Nuffield College, Oxford, for their helpful comments and suggestions on earlier versions of this paper. We are especially indebted to Marcus Chambers, who suggested the formulation of the observation equations used in our continuous-time unobserved components models for stock and flow variables. All errors are ours.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文