跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要讨论支出的层级两部分模型,未明确建模离散选择行为、纵向面板或因果识别。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Min Zhang
Mark E Cowen
Martin T Wells

两部分层级模型的贝叶斯推断

研究问题
面对零值较多、右偏且在医生内部相关的患者药品支出,如何构建统计画像并形成医生层面的表现度量?
方法与思路
作者采用含相关随机效应的两部分层级模型,在贝叶斯框架下通过 MCMC 推断,以刻画支出分布及医生内部相关性。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,随机效应结构具有处方模式解释,并据此构造医生表现度量,用于医生排序及设计一种财务激励方案。
阅读关注点
应核对两部分的具体分布、随机效应相关结构、患者差异的调整,以及表现度量和排序如何处理后验不确定性。
阅读边界
仅据版本未注明的 OpenAlex 索引摘要;模型设定与激励效果未说明,统计画像不能直接认定为医生对支出的因果贡献。

原文摘要

Profiling is currently an important, and hotly debated, topic in health care and other industries looking for ways to control costs, increase profitability, and increase service quality. Managed care in particular has seen a proliferation in the use of statistical profiling methodology, particularly with regard to monitoring expenditure data. This article focuses on the specific problem of developing statistical methods appropriate for profiling physician contributions to patient pharmacy expenditures incurred in a managed care setting. The two-part hierarchical model with a correlated random-effects structure considered here accounts for both the skewed, zero-inflated nature of pharmacy expenditure data and the fact that patient pharmacy expenditures are correlated within physicians. The random-effects structure has an attractive interpretation in terms of a conceptual model for physician prescribing patterns. Using this model, we propose to rank physicians based on an appropriately constructed provider-level performance measure. This information is subsequently used to develop a novel financial incentive scheme. Inference is conducted in a Bayesian framework using Markov chain Monte Carlo.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文