跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要以公共卫生监测和疫苗衰减似然模型为核心,未明确说明因果识别设计或与所列经济细分领域对应的框架。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Mona N Kanaan
C Paddy Farrington

疫苗保护效力随时间衰减的估计

研究问题
疫苗保护是否随时间衰减、衰减程度如何,以及流行病学监测中的感染发现偏差是否会影响这一判断?
方法与思路
作者建立保护持续时间异质性的选择模型与感染风险比随时间上升的退化模型,构造队列和病例报告数据的似然并比较多种设定。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称方法将感染风险、疫苗效力和感染发现过程纳入似然,通过多种假设下的拟合比较考察衰减,并应用于英国百日咳疫苗数据。
阅读关注点
应核对两类模型的可区分性、感染发现偏差及年龄风险的设定,以及允许衰减后拟合改善能在多大程度上支持机制判断。
阅读边界
仅据版本未注明的OpenAlex索引摘要。摘要未报告衰减幅度或识别条件,拟合改善不足以单独确立因果效力衰减,也不能排除其他机制。

原文摘要

Whether the protection afforded by a vaccine wanes over time and if so, by how much, are important public health questions with implications for mass immunization programs. However, the measurement of such effects is fraught with difficulties. Generally, clinical trials are too short to provide evidence on waning effects. Thus it is necessary to rely on epidemiologic data, which are subject to ascertainment bias. Furthermore, standard epidemiologic measures, such as hazard ratios, may not accurately reflect waning effects. We develop two models of waning vaccine efficacy, the selection and deterioration models. In the selection model, waning arises from heterogeneity in the duration of protection. In the deterioration model, the hazard ratio of infection in vaccinated individuals relative to unvaccinated individuals increases with time. The two models are the with-waning analogs of the previously defined “all or nothing” and ”leaky” models. Likelihood functions based on these models are obtained for cohort and case-report data, as typically collected in surveillance studies of vaccine efficacy. These likelihood functions involve three groups of parameters, corresponding to the hazard of infection, vaccine efficacy (possibly including waning effects), and ascertainment of infections. Our strategy is to fit a range of models incorporating a variety of assumptions about the vaccine efficacy model, ascertainment bias, and age dependence of the hazard. If allowing for waning improves the fit of the model under a range of scenarios, then we infer that it is a genuine effect. We apply the methods to two sets of data on whooping cough vaccine efficacy in the United Kingdom.

笔记与分组