跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确将迭代重要性抽样算法用于随机波动模型评估,提供了波动率方向的应用依据。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Wentao Li
Paul Fearnhead

近似贝叶斯计算估计量的渐近效率

研究问题
当似然难以计算但模型容易模拟时,摘要统计量的维度与重要性抽样误差如何影响近似贝叶斯计算估计量的渐近效率?
方法与思路
作者在固定维摘要统计量满足中心极限定理的前提下,分析后验均值的渐近分布、线性降维及重要性抽样误差。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,线性降至参数维度不会增加后验均值的渐近方差,并给出抽样估计方差与基于摘要统计量的极大似然估计同阶的条件。
阅读关注点
应核对中心极限定理、降维变换与提议分布的条件,区分方差同阶和效率相同,并检查随机波动模型中的算法评估。
阅读边界
仅据版本未注明的索引摘要,具体条件与模拟结果未说明;方差同阶不代表达到相同效率,随机波动案例也不保证普遍适用。

原文摘要

Many statistical applications involve models for which it is difficult to evaluate the likelihood, but from which it is relatively easy to sample. Approximate Bayesian computation is a likelihood-free method for implementing Bayesian inference in such cases. We present results on the asymptotic variance of estimators obtained using approximate Bayesian computation in a large data limit. Our key assumption is that the data are summarized by a fixed-dimensional summary statistic that obeys a central limit theorem. We prove asymptotic normality of the mean of the approximate Bayesian computation posterior. This result also shows that, in terms of asymptotic variance, we should use a summary statistic that is of the same dimension as the parameter vector, |$p$|⁠, and that any summary statistic of higher dimension can be reduced, through a linear transformation, to dimension |$p$| in a way that can only reduce the asymptotic variance of the posterior mean. We look at how the Monte Carlo error of an importance sampling algorithm that samples from the approximate Bayesian computation posterior affects the accuracy of estimators. We give conditions on the importance sampling proposal distribution such that the variance of the estimator will be of the same order as that of the maximum likelihood estimator based on the summary statistics used. This suggests an iterative importance sampling algorithm, which we evaluate empirically on a stochastic volatility model.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文