Fixed and random covariance regression analyses
固定与随机协变量下的协方差回归分析AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确包含美国股票收益协方差的实证研究,对应金融波动与协方差建模。
固定与随机协变量下的协方差回归分析AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Covariance regression analysis is an approach to linking the covariance of responses to a set of explanatory variables X, where X can be a vector, matrix, or tensor. Most of the literature on this topic focuses on the “Fixed-X” setting and treats X as nonrandom. By contrast, treating explanatory variables X as random, namely the “Random-X” setting, is often more realistic in practice. This article aims to fill this gap in the literature on the estimation and model assessment theory for Random-X covariance regression models. Specifically, we construct a new theoretical framework for studying the covariance estimators under the Random-X setting, and we demonstrate that the quasi-maximum likelihood estimator and the weighted least squares estimator are both consistent and asymptotically normal. In addition, we develop pioneering work on the model assessment theory of covariance regression. In particular, we obtain the bias-variance decompositions for the expected test errors under both the Fixed-X and Random-X settings. We show that moving from a Fixed-X to a Random-X setting can increase both the bias and the variance in expected test errors. Subsequently, we propose the estimators of the expected test errors under the Fixed-X and Random-X settings, which can be used to assess the performance of the competing covariance regression models. The proposed estimation and model assessment approaches are illustrated via extensive simulation experiments and an empirical study of stock returns in the US market.