跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要中的classification指通用统计分类,未涉及经济离散选择行为,因此没有对应给定细分领域的充分依据。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Peter Hall
Byeong U. Park

最近邻分类中的邻居阶数选择

研究问题
k近邻二分类的误分类误差如何随邻居数变化,训练样本量随机或固定时,这一关系能否支持数据驱动的选择?
方法与思路
作者分别研究总样本量随机的Poisson训练模型和总样本量固定的Binomial训练模型,比较其风险与遗憾的渐近性质。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称两种模型的风险与遗憾具有一阶渐近等价性,并与适配二阶光滑情形的核分类器风险相联系,启发新的邻居数选择方法。
阅读关注点
应核对误分类风险展开、邻居数随样本量增长的范围、两类训练模型的区别,以及经验选择规则的具体保证。
阅读边界
材料为OpenAlex索引摘要,稿件版本未注明;一阶渐近等价不意味着有限样本风险相同,摘要未说明选择算法细节或刊本变化。

原文摘要

The kth-nearest neighbor rule is arguably the simplest and most intuitively appealing nonparametric classification procedure. However, application of this method is inhibited by lack of knowledge about its properties, in particular, about the manner in which it is influenced by the value of k; and by the absence of techniques for empirical choice of k. In the present paper we detail the way in which the value of k determines the misclassification error. We consider two models, Poisson and Binomial, for the training samples. Under the first model, data are recorded in a Poisson stream and are “assigned” to one or other of the two populations in accordance with the prior probabilities. In particular, the total number of data in both training samples is a Poisson-distributed random variable. Under the Binomial model, however, the total number of data in the training samples is fixed, although again each data value is assigned in a random way. Although the values of risk and regret associated with the Poisson and Binomial models are different, they are asymptotically equivalent to first order, and also to the risks associated with kernel-based classifiers that are tailored to the case of two derivatives. These properties motivate new methods for choosing the value of k.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文