跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确研究含个体和时间固定效应的空间动态面板及其GMM估计。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Lung-fei Lee
Jihai Yu

固定效应空间动态面板模型的有效GMM估计

研究问题
当横截面规模很大、时间维度相对较小时,如何估计含个体和时间固定效应的空间动态面板,并缓解最大似然的计算困难?
方法与思路
作者消除两类固定效应,以外生、预定及其邻接变量构造线性矩,并加入二次矩;比较堆叠数据与逐期多矩方法。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称所提GMM程序具有一致性、渐近正态性及相对效率,并可处理某些最大似然难以计算的空间权重设定。
阅读关注点
应核对空间权重矩阵条件、n与T的相对增长、线性和二次矩的有效性,以及逐期多矩方案的渐近与计算代价。
阅读边界
仅据所给出版社摘要,无法核对一致性速率的精确记号和效率基准;所述最大似然困难与GMM优势均依赖特定设定。

原文摘要

In this paper we derive the asymptotic properties of GMM estimators for the spatial dynamic panel data model with fixed effects when n is large, and T can be large, but small relative to n. The GMM estimation methods are designed with the fixed individual and time effects eliminated from the model, and are computationally tractable even under circumstances where the ML approach would be either infeasible or computationally complicated. The ML approach would be infeasible if the spatial weights matrix is not row-normalized while the time effects are eliminated, and would be computationally intractable if there are multiple spatial weights matrices in the model; also, consistency of the MLE would require T to be large and not small relative to n if the fixed effects are jointly estimated with other parameters of interest. The GMM approach can overcome all these difficulties. We use exogenous and predetermined variables as instruments for linear moments, along with several levels of their neighboring variables and additional quadratic moments. We stack up the data and construct the best linear and quadratic moment conditions. An alternative approach is to use separate moment conditions for each period, which gives rise to many moments estimation. We show that these GMM estimators are nT consistent, asymptotically normal, and can be relatively efficient. We compare these approaches on their finite sample performance by Monte Carlo.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文