Efficient GMM estimation of spatial dynamic panel data models with fixed effects
固定效应空间动态面板模型的有效GMM估计AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确研究含个体和时间固定效应的空间动态面板及其GMM估计。
固定效应空间动态面板模型的有效GMM估计AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
In this paper we derive the asymptotic properties of GMM estimators for the spatial dynamic panel data model with fixed effects when n is large, and T can be large, but small relative to n. The GMM estimation methods are designed with the fixed individual and time effects eliminated from the model, and are computationally tractable even under circumstances where the ML approach would be either infeasible or computationally complicated. The ML approach would be infeasible if the spatial weights matrix is not row-normalized while the time effects are eliminated, and would be computationally intractable if there are multiple spatial weights matrices in the model; also, consistency of the MLE would require T to be large and not small relative to n if the fixed effects are jointly estimated with other parameters of interest. The GMM approach can overcome all these difficulties. We use exogenous and predetermined variables as instruments for linear moments, along with several levels of their neighboring variables and additional quadratic moments. We stack up the data and construct the best linear and quadratic moment conditions. An alternative approach is to use separate moment conditions for each period, which gives rise to many moments estimation. We show that these GMM estimators are nT consistent, asymptotically normal, and can be relatively efficient. We compare these approaches on their finite sample performance by Monte Carlo.