跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究通用混合模型的计算算法,随机效应与似然拟合不足以确定面板或结构估计方向。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
James G. Booth
James P. Hobert

自动化 Monte Carlo EM 算法最大化广义线性混合模型似然

研究问题
拟合广义线性混合模型时,如何在 Monte Carlo EM 中评估迭代误差、自动增加模拟样本量,并选择合适的抽样方法?
方法与思路
作者分别使用拒绝抽样与多元 t 重要性抽样近似 E 步,通过中心极限定理和 Taylor 方法构造方差估计,指导模拟样本量调整。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称两种方法在不同样本规模下互补,可自动控制迭代中的模拟误差;三个数据例子展示其相较部分 MCMC 实现的效率优势。
阅读关注点
应核对拒绝抽样接受率、重要性权重稳定性、方差估计与增样规则,并检查比较的计算口径及高维积分失效的原因。
阅读边界
仅据所给 Crossref 摘要,未核对全文或版本差异。摘要明确指出高维积分可能使方法失效,所述效率优势不能推广至所有 MCEM 实现。

原文摘要

Summary Two new implementations of the EM algorithm are proposed for maximum likelihood fitting of generalized linear mixed models. Both methods use random (independent and identically distributed) sampling to construct Monte Carlo approximations at the E-step. One approach involves generating random samples from the exact conditional distribution of the random effects (given the data) by rejection sampling, using the marginal distribution as a candidate. The second method uses a multivariate t importance sampling approximation. In many applications the two methods are complementary. Rejection sampling is more efficient when sample sizes are small, whereas importance sampling is better with larger sample sizes. Monte Carlo approximation using random samples allows the Monte Carlo error at each iteration to be assessed by using standard central limit theory combined with Taylor series methods. Specifically, we construct a sandwich variance estimate for the maximizer at each approximate E-step. This suggests a rule for automatically increasing the Monte Carlo sample size after iterations in which the true EM step is swamped by Monte Carlo error. In contrast, techniques for assessing Monte Carlo error have not been developed for use with alternative implementations of Monte Carlo EM algorithms utilizing Markov chain Monte Carlo E-step approximations. Three different data sets, including the infamous salamander data of McCullagh and Nelder, are used to illustrate the techniques and to compare them with the alternatives. The results show that the methods proposed can be considerably more efficient than those based on Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithms. However, the methods proposed may break down when the intractable integrals in the likelihood function are of high dimension.

笔记与分组