Ramses Mena Chavez's contribution to the Discussion of ‘Martingale Posterior Distributions’ by Fong, Holmes and Walker
Mena Chavez 对《鞅后验分布》的讨论AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:主题是一般预测式贝叶斯推断的讨论;自回归模型仅为例子,尚不足以把整篇讨论归为时间序列细分研究。
Mena Chavez 对《鞅后验分布》的讨论AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
I congratulate the authors for introducing a novel approach for Bayesian inference, which avoids directly using the posterior distribution, often not available or computationally expensive. In addition to opening several lines of thinking about the foundations of Bayesian statistics, their proposal unveils many interesting directions to be explored and applied within the world of statistics. With an infinite population and the epistemic view of uncertainty (see, e.g. Goldstein, 2013), namely when the posterior represents the uncertainty due to missing observations, exchangeability arises naturally. Here, by applying a martingale convergence result by Doob (1949), the authors show that the predictive view of Bayesian inference allows one to obtain the posterior distribution, provided the statistic, θn, summarising observations, y1:n, is a martingale. This requirement might indeed lead to other types of symmetries, i.e. not necessarily exchangeability. Within the exchangeability setting, the proposed predictive approach resembles much to that frequently used in Bayesian non-parametrics, e.g. via the Blackwell and MacQueen Pólya-Urn and many of its generalisations used for posterior inference. Hence, with the findings in this paper, one wonders whether the exchangeability requirement is the most practical one. Furthermore, there might be other ways to relax the martingale condition, namely throughout other convergence requirements for θn. Clearly, one of the appealing features of the proposed approach is bypassing the prior to posterior computation, by suitably modelling predictive distributions of conditionally identically distributed (c.i.d.) sequences and θn. For some of the examples in the paper, it is clear what the predictive structure should look like, and though the authors propose a fairly general predictive using their copula approach, there are many inference scenarios where one would need to be very creative to achieve the desired inference, for instance Bayesian inference for phenomena typically modelled throughout continuous time Markov processes. For an Autoregressive of order one, AR(1), model with transition density p(xi|xi−1;ρ)=N(xi|ρxi−1,1), and ρ as the parameter of interest, one could use the predictive where a:=∑i=2nxixi−1 and b:=1+∑i=2nxi−12, with functional statistic ρ¯N=a/b. This proposal comes from assuming an N(0,1) prior for ρ and computing the predictive. However, without passing throughout such mechanism, a natural question is how could one propose such predictive and the form to be used for ρ¯N. Indeed, the authors proposal works very well, see Figure 1. Martingale posterior and posterior distribution for ρ. The following contributions were received in writing after the meeting.