跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要直接检验因果分析中使用的倾向得分模型,并以政策与培训项目展示应用。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Shiyao Huang
Xiaojun Song

倾向得分的平滑设定检验

研究问题
如何检验倾向得分模型的设定,在处理未知干扰参数的同时获得便于实施的零假设分布和局部备择检验能力?
方法与思路
作者用密度加权将限制转为广义傅里叶系数的联合显著性检验,通过投影消除参数估计影响,并数据驱动选择阶数。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称检验具有标准零假设分布和非平凡局部功效,模拟总体表现可比,并在部分高频备择下改善,另展示两个应用。
阅读关注点
应核对倾向得分限制、投影构造、检验阶数选择对推断的影响,以及高维表现和计算效率比较所需的条件。
阅读边界
仅据所给Crossref版本摘要;局部备择收敛率公式在输入中缺失,不能补写,且不能由摘要推断后续刊本变化。

原文摘要

ABSTRACT This paper proposes a simple smooth specification test for the propensity score in the spirit of Neyman (1937). We derive a particular restriction on the propensity score and construct the specification test based on it. Using the density‐weighting method, we transform the original specification testing problem into a test of the joint significance of the generalized Fourier coefficients. We propose a novel projection method to eliminate the parameter estimation effect arising from estimating unknown nuisance parameters. The proposed test is shown to follow a standard distribution under the null hypothesis and to possess nontrivial asymptotic power against local alternatives that converge to the null at the parametric rate , where is the sample size. To enhance the practical applicability of the procedure, we further introduce a data‐driven selection method for determining the testing order, enabling automatic selection based on the observed data. Compared to existing methods, our test does not suffer from the “curse of dimensionality” faced by Shaikh et al. (2009); at the same time, our test is both asymptotically pivotal and more computationally efficient than that of Sant'Anna and Song (2019). Extensive simulations demonstrate that the proposed test yields satisfactory empirical size and power. Compared with previous tests, our test exhibits comparable overall performance and delivers clear improvements in some cases, especially for high‐frequency alternatives. Two empirical applications further illustrate the practical applicability of our proposal, examining propensity score specifications in the Soviet 156 Program and the US Job Corps Program.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文