跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要属于一般统计学习的分类风险理论,未明确涉及离散选择或所列经济预测方向。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Aryeh Kontorovich
Iosif Pinelis

不可知 PAC 机器学习模型的精确下界

研究问题
在不可知 PAC 分类模型中,极小极大期望超额风险的有限样本与渐近下界能否精确刻画,并找到达到相关界限的学习程序?
方法与思路
作者结合贝叶斯估计与二项分布恒等式、不等式,将极小极大学习算法刻画为具有特定对称性和随机化程度的投票程序。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称给出精确非渐近及渐近下界、易计算的近似下界,并证明相关风险差异渐近可忽略,同时改善超额风险尾概率下界。
阅读关注点
应核对极小极大问题的取值范围、假设类与 VC 维度的作用,以及投票平局如何产生界限差异和尾概率结论。
阅读边界
依据版本未注明的索引摘要;精确界对应的模型条件及算法定义未完整说明,不能据此评价任意分类器的实际表现。

原文摘要

We provide an exact nonasymptotic lower bound on the minimax expected excess risk (EER) in the agnostic probably-approximately-correct (PAC) machine learning classification model and identify minimax learning algorithms as certain maximally symmetric and minimally randomized “voting” procedures. Based on this result, an exact asymptotic lower bound on the minimax EER is provided. This bound is of the simple form $c_{\infty}/\sqrt{\nu}$ as $\nu\to\infty$, where $c_{\infty}=0.16997\dots$ is a universal constant, $\nu=m/d$, $m$ is the size of the training sample and $d$ is the Vapnik–Chervonenkis dimension of the hypothesis class. It is shown that the differences between these asymptotic and nonasymptotic bounds, as well as the differences between these two bounds and the maximum EER of any learning algorithms that minimize the empirical risk, are asymptotically negligible, and all these differences are due to ties in the mentioned “voting” procedures. A few easy to compute nonasymptotic lower bounds on the minimax EER are also obtained, which are shown to be close to the exact asymptotic lower bound $c_{\infty}/\sqrt{\nu}$ even for rather small values of the ratio $\nu=m/d$. As an application of these results, we substantially improve existing lower bounds on the tail probability of the excess risk. Among the tools used are Bayes estimation and apparently new identities and inequalities for binomial distributions.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文