An Application of Nonlinear Bounded Influence Estimation to Aggregate Bank Borrowing from the Federal Reserve
非线性有界影响估计在美联储银行总借款中的应用AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要以贴现窗口总借款的解释和预测困难为研究动机,直接涉及宏观金融总量预测。
非线性有界影响估计在美联储银行总借款中的应用AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Forecasting aggregate discount window borrowing has posed difficulties for the Federal Reserve, due in part to outliers resulting from numerous institutional changes and special borrowing situations. This article applies bounded influence estimation and influence diagnostics to identify and adjust for outliers in the case of discount window borrowing. Since most banks borrow from the Federal Reserve infrequently, the model is nonlinear and of the switching regression class. We perform case-deletion diagnostics, modifying the empirical influence function of Reid and Crepeau (1985) for the nonlinear regression. The bounded influence estimator (BIE) extends Carroll and Ruppert (1985, 1987). Influence diagnostics and bounded influence estimation contribute to the investigation of discount window borrowing in a number of ways. Examination of weights generated by the estimator reveals that the BIE downweights observations during periods of known institutional change affecting the discount window. Consequently, the relative importance of institutional events can be inferred. Examples of institutional circumstances creating outliers in this application include the Monetary Control Act of 1980, the threatened bond defaults of late 1982, the February 1984 change to Contemporaneous Reserve Accounting, solvency problems of the Continental Bank of Illinois during 1984, and borrowing in May 1985 by Maryland thrift institutions affected by bank runs. Influence diagnostics in turn provide information concerning what parameter estimates have been most altered as a result. An interesting intuitive finding arises from use of the switching regression model: outlying observations tend to influence estimated parameters only from the same regime. When compared with maximum likelihood, we find that the BIE substantially alters some parameter estimates, including the estimated switchpoints. Identifying and correcting for outliers by the BIE improves the ability of the model to discriminate among regimes. Moreover, bounded influence estimation in discount window borrowing increases estimator efficiency, reduces residual pattern, discriminates outliers from large estimated residuals, and slightly improves the goodness of fit. The overall findings indicate that influence diagnostics and bounded influence estimation could significantly assist the Federal Reserve in explaining and predicting discount window borrowing.