跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要以贴现窗口总借款的解释和预测困难为研究动机,直接涉及宏观金融总量预测。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Chihwa Kao

非线性有界影响估计在美联储银行总借款中的应用

研究问题
制度变化和特殊借款事件产生的异常观测,如何影响贴现窗口总借款的非线性模型,以及对借款解释和预测的能力?
方法与思路
作者在切换回归模型中应用有界影响估计,结合删个案诊断及经修改的经验影响函数,分析异常观测对参数和切换点的影响。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,该估计降低已知制度变动时期观测的权重,改变部分参数与切换点,并改善制度区间区分、残差表现和部分拟合指标。
阅读关注点
核对切换机制、有界影响权重及异常值定义,检查效率比较的依据,并确认解释和预测方面的改善是否有样本外证据。
阅读边界
仅据 OpenAlex 索引摘要,稿件版本未注明,刊本差异未核验;预测改善未给出具体评估设计,权重也不能单独识别制度事件的因果影响。

原文摘要

Forecasting aggregate discount window borrowing has posed difficulties for the Federal Reserve, due in part to outliers resulting from numerous institutional changes and special borrowing situations. This article applies bounded influence estimation and influence diagnostics to identify and adjust for outliers in the case of discount window borrowing. Since most banks borrow from the Federal Reserve infrequently, the model is nonlinear and of the switching regression class. We perform case-deletion diagnostics, modifying the empirical influence function of Reid and Crepeau (1985) for the nonlinear regression. The bounded influence estimator (BIE) extends Carroll and Ruppert (1985, 1987). Influence diagnostics and bounded influence estimation contribute to the investigation of discount window borrowing in a number of ways. Examination of weights generated by the estimator reveals that the BIE downweights observations during periods of known institutional change affecting the discount window. Consequently, the relative importance of institutional events can be inferred. Examples of institutional circumstances creating outliers in this application include the Monetary Control Act of 1980, the threatened bond defaults of late 1982, the February 1984 change to Contemporaneous Reserve Accounting, solvency problems of the Continental Bank of Illinois during 1984, and borrowing in May 1985 by Maryland thrift institutions affected by bank runs. Influence diagnostics in turn provide information concerning what parameter estimates have been most altered as a result. An interesting intuitive finding arises from use of the switching regression model: outlying observations tend to influence estimated parameters only from the same regime. When compared with maximum likelihood, we find that the BIE substantially alters some parameter estimates, including the estimated switchpoints. Identifying and correcting for outliers by the BIE improves the ability of the model to discriminate among regimes. Moreover, bounded influence estimation in discount window borrowing increases estimator efficiency, reduces residual pattern, discriminates outliers from large estimated residuals, and slightly improves the goodness of fit. The overall findings indicate that influence diagnostics and bounded influence estimation could significantly assist the Federal Reserve in explaining and predicting discount window borrowing.

笔记与分组