Frequentist Evaluation of Small DSGE Models
小型 DSGE 模型的频率学派评估AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确以 VAR 系统评估新凯恩斯 DSGE 模型,并联合检验协整与短期跨方程限制,直接对应时间序列及 VAR 方向。
小型 DSGE 模型的频率学派评估AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
This article proposes a new evaluation approach for the class of small-scale “hybrid” new Keynesian dynamic stochastic general equilibrium (NK-DSGE) models typically used in monetary policy and business cycle analysis. The empirical assessment of the NK-DSGE model is based on a conditional sequence of likelihood-based tests conducted in a vector autoregressive (VAR) system, in which both the low- and high-frequency implications of the model are addressed in a coherent framework. If the low-frequency behavior of the original time series of the model can be approximated by nonstationary processes, stationarity must be imposed by removing the stochastic trends. This gives rise to a set of recoverable unit roots/cointegration restrictions, in addition to the short-run cross-equation restrictions. The procedure is based on the sequence “LR1→LR2→LR3,” where LR1 is the cointegration rank test, LR2 is the cointegration matrix test, and LR3 is the cross-equation restrictions test: LR2 is computed conditional on LR1 and LR3 is computed conditional on LR2. The Type I errors of the three tests are set consistently with a prefixed overall nominal significance level. A bootstrap analog of the testing strategy is proposed in small samples. We show that the information stemming from the individual tests can be used constructively to uncover which features of the data are not captured by the theoretical model and thus to rectify, when possible, the specification. We investigate the empirical size properties of the proposed testing strategy by a Monte Carlo experiment and show the empirical usefulness of our approach by estimating and testing a monetary business cycle NK-DSGE model using U.S. quarterly data. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.