跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确采用潜在结果与倾向得分估计平均因果效应,并对未测混杂开展敏感性分析。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Zhiqiang Tan

利用倾向得分进行因果推断的分布方法

研究问题
如何在给定协变量无混杂时估计平均因果效应,并在存在未测混杂的情况下评估效应估计可能发生多大变化?
方法与思路
作者在潜在结果框架下采用非参数似然与参数化倾向得分,构造加权经验分布,并在给定未测混杂界限下考察反事实分布。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要提出效应估计与混杂敏感性分析两种互补方法,并声称相关似然和回归估计在效率或稳健性上至少达到所比较方法的水平。
阅读关注点
应核对无混杂及其他识别条件、倾向得分模型的作用,以及未测混杂界限的定义、极端分布搜索和效率比较的适用范围。
阅读边界
仅据 OpenAlex 索引摘要,稿件版本未注明;摘要未给出全部条件或比较对象细节,效率与稳健性陈述不能视为无条件保证。

原文摘要

Drawing inferences about the effects of treatments and actions is a common challenge in economics, epidemiology, and other fields. We adopt Rubin's potential outcomes framework for causal inference and propose two methods serving complementary purposes. One can be used to estimate average causal effects, assuming no confounding given measured covariates. The other can be used to assess how the estimates might change under various departures from no confounding. Both methods are developed from a nonparametric likelihood perspective. The propensity score plays a central role and is estimated through a parametric model. Under the assumption of no confounding, the joint distribution of covariates and each potential outcome is estimated as a weighted empirical distribution. Expectations from the joint distribution are estimated as weighted averages or, equivalently to first order, regression estimates. The likelihood estimator is at least as efficient and the regression estimator is at least as efficient and robust as existing estimators. Regardless of the no-confounding assumption, the marginal distribution of covariates times the conditional distribution of observed outcome given each treatment assignment and covariates is estimated. For a fixed bound on unmeasured confounding, the marginal distribution of covariates times the conditional distribution of counterfactual outcome given each treatment assignment and covariates is explored to the extreme and then compared with the composite distribution corresponding to observed outcome given the same treatment assignment and covariates. We illustrate the methods by analyzing the data from an observational study on right heart catheterization.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文