Benchmarked empirical Bayes methods in multiplicative area-level models with risk evaluation
乘法区域模型中带基准约束的经验贝叶斯方法与风险评估AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究小区域估计与汇总约束,未提供重复时间观测或所列其他细分方向的依据。
乘法区域模型中带基准约束的经验贝叶斯方法与风险评估AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
The paper develops hierarchical empirical Bayes and benchmarked hierarchical empirical Bayes estimators of positive small area means under multiplicative models. The usual benchmarking requirement is that the small area estimates, when aggregated, should equal the direct estimates for the larger geographical areas. However, while estimating positive small area parameters, the conventional squared error or weighted squared error loss subject to the usual benchmark constraint may not produce positive estimators, so it is necessary to seek other loss functions. We consider a multiplicative model for the original data for estimating positive small area means, and suggest a variant of the Kullback–Leibler divergence as a loss function. The prediction errors of the suggested hierarchical empirical Bayes estimators are investigated asymptotically, and their second-order unbiased estimators are provided. Bootstrapped estimators of these prediction errors for both hierarchical empirical Bayes and benchmarked hierarchical empirical Bayes estimators are also given. The performance of the suggested procedures is investigated through simulation as well as with an example.