跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究通用非参数回归的样条近似与计算,预测误差比较不足以归入宏观预测方向。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Cheng Meng
Xinlian Zhang
Jingyi Zhang
Wenxuan Zhong
Ping Ma

通过空间填充基函数选择提高平滑样条近似效率

研究问题
在多预测变量非参数回归中,如何减少近似平滑样条所需的基函数数量,在保留收敛表现的同时降低计算成本?
方法与思路
作者选择对应于近似等间距观测的基函数,以空间填充方式增加基函数集合的多样性,并分析该选择规则的渐近性质。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称在给定维度与光滑性条件下可降低必要基函数数量的阶;合成与真实数据例子展示较小的预测误差。
阅读关注点
应核对空间填充选择的实现、维度与函数光滑性的限制、基函数数量缩减的推导,以及计算成本和预测误差比较。
阅读边界
仅据所给 Crossref 摘要,数量缩减依赖维度与光滑性条件;数值预测优势不能普遍化,也不能推断其他版本变化。

原文摘要

Summary We consider the problem of approximating smoothing spline estimators in a nonparametric regression model. When applied to a sample of size $n$, the smoothing spline estimator can be expressed as a linear combination of $n$ basis functions, requiring $O(n^3)$ computational time when the number $d$ of predictors is two or more. Such a sizeable computational cost hinders the broad applicability of smoothing splines. In practice, the full-sample smoothing spline estimator can be approximated by an estimator based on $q$ randomly selected basis functions, resulting in a computational cost of $O(nq^2)$. It is known that these two estimators converge at the same rate when $q$ is of order $O\{n^{2/(pr+1)}\}$, where $p\in [1,2]$ depends on the true function and $r > 1$ depends on the type of spline. Such a $q$ is called the essential number of basis functions. In this article, we develop a more efficient basis selection method. By selecting basis functions corresponding to approximately equally spaced observations, the proposed method chooses a set of basis functions with great diversity. The asymptotic analysis shows that the proposed smoothing spline estimator can decrease $q$ to around $O\{n^{1/(pr+1)}\}$ when $d\leq pr+1$. Applications to synthetic and real-world datasets show that the proposed method leads to a smaller prediction error than other basis selection methods.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文