Bayesian Methodology for Adaptive Sparsity and Shrinkage in Regression
回归中自适应稀疏性与收缩的贝叶斯方法AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要讨论通用回归先验与计算方法,未提供足够证据归入指定的应用或模型细分。
回归中自适应稀疏性与收缩的贝叶斯方法AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Bayesian and frequentist regularization techniques are commonly employed for estimating regression models from data. However, most existing methods require practitioners to pre-specify whether the target model is dense or sparse. A recent proposal, the GLP prior distribution, addresses this limitation by bridging the gap between sparse and dense model regimes in a data-driven manner. Despite its flexibility, the GLP prior incurs high computational costs due to matrix inversions and discretization-based sampling. This paper introduces a novel prior distribution, ACSS, designed to induce negative dependence between sparsity and shrinkage in regression models. Similar to the GLP prior, ACSS effectively estimates regression models across a wide spectrum of sparsity levels, from extremely sparse to fully dense. However, the ACSS distribution offers a significant computational advantage. Its Gibbs sampling strategy eliminates the need for matrix inversions and relies on sampling from standard univariate distributions, making it computationally efficient. Extensive experiments on synthetic and real data sets demonstrate that ACSS-based estimation is orders of magnitude faster than GLP. Moreover, in most cases, it also achieves superior estimation and predictive accuracy, underscoring its practical utility and effectiveness.