跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要直接研究随机实验中的析因处理效应、随机化推断及协变量调整,属于因果推断。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Hanzhong Liu
Jiyang Ren
Yuehan Yang

随机区组析因实验的随机化联合中心极限定理与高效协变量调整

研究问题
在随机区组析因实验中,如何不依赖线性模型正确设定来建立析因效应的联合推断,并通过协变量调整提高估计效率?
方法与思路
作者在有限总体随机化框架下扩展向量形式的秩统计量极限定理,提出四种协变量调整方法及 Neyman 型保守协方差估计。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称建立未调整效应估计的联合中心极限定理,并在一定条件下证明调整后估计一致、联合渐近正态且通常更有效率。
阅读关注点
应核对随机化设计、区组与总体增长条件、四种调整方法的差异,以及效率比较和保守协方差估计成立的具体范围。
阅读边界
仅据 OpenAlex 索引摘要,稿件版本未注明,不能推断刊本变化;析因水平数的幂次排版需核对原 PDF,稳健性陈述也仍受定理条件约束。

原文摘要

Randomized block factorial experiments are widely used in industrial engineering, clinical trials, and social science. Researchers often use a linear model and analysis of covariance to analyze experimental results; however, limited studies have addressed the validity and robustness of the resulting inferences because assumptions for a linear model might not be justified by randomization in randomized block factorial experiments. In this article, we establish a new finite population joint central limit theorem for usual (unadjusted) factorial effect estimators in randomized block 2K factorial experiments. Our theorem is obtained under a randomization-based inference framework, making use of an extension of the vector form of the Wald–Wolfowitz–Hoeffding theorem for a linear rank statistic. It is robust to model misspecification, numbers of blocks, block sizes, and propensity scores across blocks. To improve the estimation and inference efficiency, we propose four covariate adjustment methods. We show that under mild conditions, the resulting covariate-adjusted factorial effect estimators are consistent, jointly asymptotically normal, and generally more efficient than the unadjusted estimator. In addition, we propose Neyman-type conservative estimators for the asymptotic covariances to facilitate valid inferences. Simulation studies and a clinical trial data analysis demonstrate the benefits of the covariate adjustment methods. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文