Likelihood for component parameters
分量参数的似然AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要属于一般高阶似然理论,没有指向所列经济计量领域细分。
分量参数的似然AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
For a statistical model with data, likelihood for the scalar or vector full parameter θ, of dimension p say, is typically well defined and easily computed. In this paper, we investigate likelihood for a component parameter ψ(θ) of dimension d < p and make use of the recent likelihood theory that has been successful in producing highly accurate third‐order p‐values for scalar parameters of continuous models. The theory leads under moderate regularity to a definitive third‐order determination of likelihood for a component parameter ψ(θ) of dimension d, where 1 ≤ d ≤ p. We use the simple location model on the plane with standard normal errors to motivate the development. The example exhibits most of the key characteristics of the general case and the recent theory then extends the determination of likelihood to the general context. For the scalar interest parameter case with d = 1, the usual determinations are typically of second‐order accuracy; the example indicates how the new determination achieves third‐order accuracy. The implementation is straightforward and uses familiar ingredients to other determinations, such as the full maximum likelihood value θ̂, the constrained value θ̃ψ given ψ(θ) = ψ, and the observed information jλλ(θ̂ψ) for a complementing nuisance parameter λ(θ). It does however require a special version of the nuisance information jλλ(θ̂ψ), a version calibrated relative to a symmetric choice of the exponential‐type reparameterisation φ(θ) underlying the recent theory, but this is easily computed. Various examples are given and the motivating example is discussed in detail.