跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

本页为预印本版本;arXiv 收录、作者填写的期刊信息以及作者既有发表经历,都不单独证明本篇已接收。作者发表记录按 OpenAlex 身份与完整姓名、本站覆盖期刊 ISSN 及正式卷期核对,只展示已核实例,档案仍可能误合并。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究干预分布的拓扑结构差异及其因果识别,直接涉及超越均值的分布效应。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Usef Faghihi

超越均值的结构性因果效应与拓扑可忽略性

研究问题
当干预改变结果分布的连通性、孔洞或分支却几乎不改变均值时,如何定义并识别这些分布结构上的因果效应?
方法与思路
作者以Betti、Euler及持久同调摘要构造拓扑几何效应,提出只要求目标结构特征保持不变的拓扑可忽略性,并进行协变量标准化。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,非单射摘要可在不识别完整干预分布时识别目标特征;两个隐藏混杂基准中,部分Betti与Euler对比保持稳定。
阅读关注点
应核对拓扑可忽略性的形式、特征选择与单射性的作用,以及密度阈值、标准化和实际估计如何影响结构效应。
阅读边界
这是arXiv预印本,同行评审或期刊接收未经核实。特定基准中的稳定性不足以证明普遍抗混杂,摘要未说明完整识别与推断条件。

原文摘要

Many interventions alter the structure of an outcome distribution rather than its mean: they can split a population into disconnected regimes, create loops or holes, generate branches, or reorganize an outcome cloud while leaving the average response nearly unchanged. In such settings, mean-based causal estimands such as the average treatment effect may miss important structural effects. We introduce topological-geometrical causal metrics based on summaries of interventional outcome laws, including density-superlevel Betti summaries, Euler signatures, and persistent-homology summaries. These metrics quantify structural differences between treated and untreated outcome laws beyond averages. We also study the assumptions needed for causal interpretation. We introduce topological ignorability, a topological analogue of conditional ignorability that requires invariance of the chosen structural feature rather than the full counterfactual distribution. When the chosen summary is injective, this condition coincides with weak ignorability; for noninjective summaries, it can identify the structural feature of interest without identifying the full interventional law. We define a covariate-standardized topological-geometrical causal effect and develop practical estimators. We validate the framework in two hidden-confounding benchmarks: a fully synthetic exact benchmark and a real-covariate semi-synthetic benchmark using Wisconsin breast-cancer covariates. In both, weak ignorability fails and balancing observed covariates nearly eliminates standardized mean differences, yet the coordinate-mean average treatment effect remains biased. By contrast, selected finite density-superlevel Betti and Euler contrasts remain stable across oracle, observational, and weighted analyses.

笔记与分组