Estimating Models With Intertemporal Substitution Using Aggregate Time Series Data
利用总量时间序列估计跨期替代模型AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确研究消费型跨期资产定价模型,并使用总量时间序列检验替代限制。
利用总量时间序列估计跨期替代模型AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
In conducting empirical investigations of the permanent income model of consumption and the consumption-based intertemporal asset pricing model, various authors have imposed restrictions on the nature of the substitutability of consumption across goods and over time.In this paper we suggest a method for testing some of these restrictions and present empirical results using this approach.Our empirical analyses focuses on three questions: (1) Can the services from durable and nondurable goods be treated as perfect substitutes?(ii) Are preferences completely separable between durable and nondurable goods?(iii) What is the nature of intertemporal substitutability of nondurable consumption?When consumers' preferences are assumed to be quadratic, there is very little evidence against the hypothesis that the services from durable goods and nondurable goods are perfect substitutes.These results call into question the practice of testing quadratic models of aggregate consumption using data on nondurables and services only.When we consider S branch specifications, we find more evidence against perfect substitutability between service flows, but less evidence against strict separability across durable and nondurable consumption goods.Among other things, these findings suggest that the empirical shortcomings of the intertemporal asset pricing model cannot be attributed to the neglect of durable goods.