跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要聚焦生存模型与外部辅助信息融合,未明确建立因果识别或所列其他细分问题,故保留空分类。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Chiung-Yu Huang
Jing Qin
Huei-Ting Tsai

利用辅助亚组生存信息提高 Cox 模型估计效率

研究问题
如何将个体层面数据与外部来源公布的亚组生存概率结合,以提高生存模型估计效率并检验信息相容性?
方法与思路
作者将外部生存信息转化为非线性总体矩条件,以经验似然估计模型,并研究允许外部数据基线风险不同的扩展。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称方法可组合来自不同研究的亚组信息,提出相容性检验,并在模拟中相较传统部分似然获得效率提升。
阅读关注点
应核对跨来源总体的可比性、外部生存概率的不确定性处理,以及不同基线风险扩展和相容性检验的条件。
阅读边界
仅据版本未注明的 OpenAlex 索引摘要;跨总体信息迁移条件及效率增益范围未说明,不能据此认定具有因果解释或推断刊本变化。

原文摘要

With the rapidly increasing availability of data in the public domain, combining information from different sources to infer about associations or differences of interest has become an emerging challenge to researchers. This article presents a novel approach to improve efficiency in estimating the survival time distribution by synthesizing information from the individual-level data with t-year survival probabilities from external sources such as disease registries. While disease registries provide accurate and reliable overall survival statistics for the disease population, critical pieces of information that influence both choice of treatment and clinical outcomes usually are not available in the registry database. To combine with the published information, we propose to summarize the external survival information via a system of nonlinear population moments and estimate the survival time model using empirical likelihood methods. The proposed approach is more flexible than the conventional meta-analysis in the sense that it can automatically combine survival information for different subgroups and the information may be derived from different studies. Moreover, an extended estimator that allows for a different baseline risk in the aggregate data is also studied. Empirical likelihood ratio tests are proposed to examine whether the auxiliary survival information is consistent with the individual-level data. Simulation studies show that the proposed estimators yield a substantial gain in efficiency over the conventional partial likelihood approach. Two sets of data analysis are conducted to illustrate the methods and theory.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文