跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要讨论通用重抽样计算方法,所述应用未提供所列领域细分的直接依据。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Michael A. Newton
Charles J. Geyer

Bootstrap 循环利用:嵌套 Bootstrap 的蒙特卡洛替代方案

研究问题
当生成 bootstrap 样本或逐样本计算成本很高时,能否通过复用模拟样本,实现原本难以承担的嵌套 bootstrap 推断?
方法与思路
作者保留第一阶段拟合模型抽样,第二阶段从支配各第一阶段拟合分布的共同测度抽样,再复用这批样本估计推断调整。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称该算法使预枢轴化和 bootstrap 迭代更可行;非参数问题的效率增益较小,参数问题可能较大,并给出两类应用。
阅读关注点
应核对共同测度的选择与支配条件、样本复用如何估计调整量,以及效率评价是否同时考虑模拟误差和计算成本。
阅读边界
仅据版本未注明的 OpenAlex 索引摘要;效率增益依赖第二阶段测度及问题类型,具体误差保证和收益数值未提供,不能认定总是优于嵌套法。

原文摘要

A Monte Carlo algorithm is described that can be used in place of the nested bootstrap. It is particularly advantageous when there is a premium on the number of bootstrap samples, either because samples are hard to generate or because expensive computations are applied to each sample. This recycling algorithm is useful because it enables inference procedures like prepivoting and bootstrap iteration in models where nested bootstrapping is computationally impractical. Implementation of the recycling algorithm is quite straightforward. As a replacement of the double bootstrap, for example, bootstrap recycling involves two stages of sampling, as does the double bootstrap. The first stage of both algorithms is the same: simulate from the fitted model. In the second stage of recycling, one batch of samples is simulated from one measure; a measure dominating all the first-stage fits. These samples are recycled with each first-stage sample to yield estimated adjustments to the original inference procedure. Choice of this second-stage measure affects the efficiency of the recycling algorithm. Gains in efficiency are slight for the nonparametric bootstrap but can be substantial in parametric problems. Applications are given to testing with sparse contingency tables and to construction of likelihood-based confidence sets in a hidden Markov model from hematology.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文