跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要讨论的是同时置信区间与覆盖概率的统计推断理论,未涉及因果识别、面板、离散选择、时间序列或金融计量等具体领域细分,故不选择任何领域 key。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
A. J. Hayter

一般相关均值下的成对比较

研究问题
摘要关注在三个及以上处理均值之间做同时成对比较时,Tukey(1953)T 方法的联合置信水平问题:当处理均值估计的协方差结构不“简单”(如非平衡设计或相关不等)时,联合置信水平难以直接判断,Tukey 曾猜想 T 方法总是给出保守区间。
方法与思路
作者从理论上讨论 T 方法保守性的证据,证明同时置信区间的覆盖概率仅通过处理均值估计两两之差方差这一协方差结构特征起作用,给出一组充分但非必要的条件以保证保守性,并推导出计算精确联合置信水平的积分表达式,对 k=4 的多种协方差结构进行数值评估。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称作者证明覆盖概率只依赖两两差值的方差,给出确保 T 方法区间保守的充分非必要条件,推导出计算精确联合置信水平或达到给定联合置信水平的区间的积分表达式,并讨论该方法在若干产生相关处理均值估计的常见实验设计中的应用。
阅读关注点
阅读全文时应核对:充分条件的推导前提与适用范围;积分表达式的具体形式与计算可行性;k=4 数值评估所覆盖的协方差结构类型;对非平衡设计等常见设计的讨论是否给出可操作结论;以及保守性结论是否被推广到 k>4。
阅读边界
仅凭摘要无法判断证明的完整性与一般性,无法确认 k>4 时保守性是否成立,也无法核实数值评估的具体设置与结果;摘要未说明所涉实验设计的具体类型与数据来源。该摘要来自 OpenAlex 索引,稿件版本未注明,不能据此声称已经同行评审或期刊接收。

原文摘要

A commonly occurring statistical inference problem in practice is that of making simultaneous comparisons among three or more treatment means μi (1 ≤ i ≤ k) for certain experimental designs. One way to do this, the T method proposed by Tukey (1953), constructs simultaneous confidence intervals for all pairwise differences of the treatment means μi – μj (1 ≤ i, j ≤ k, i ≈ j). The joint confidence level of these confidence intervals, however, depends in a very complicated fashion on the covariance structure of the treatment mean estimates μi , and, therefore, for designs where the covariance structure is not “simple,” the joint confidence level is not readily apparent. In general, this is the case for any unbalanced design or for designs in which the treatment mean estimates μi have unequal correlations. Tukey conjectured in 1953 that whatever the correlation structure of the treatment mean estimates μi , the T method would always provide a conservative set of confidence intervals, that is, that the actual joint confidence level of the confidence intervals would always be at least as great as the nominal joint confidence level 1 – α. In this article a discussion is undertaken of the evidence that the T method in general provides a conservative set of simultaneous confidence intervals. It is shown that the coverage probability of the simultaneous confidence intervals depends on the covariance structure only through the k(k − 1)/2 variances of the pairwise differences of the treatment mean estimates. A set of sufficient, but not necessary, conditions on these variances is given, which ensures that the T-method confidence intervals are conservative. In addition, the application of the T method to various common experimental designs that produce correlated treatment mean estimates is discussed. An integral expression is derived for calculating the exact joint confidence level of the T-method confidence intervals or for calculating confidence intervals of joint confidence level exactly equal to a given value. This expression is used to evaluate the coverage probabilities for a wide variety of covariance structures with k = 4. In each case considered, the T-method confidence intervals are conservative, and, furthermore, the amount of conservativeness is very small unless the population mean estimates have radically different variances and covariances.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文