Pairwise Comparisons of Generally Correlated Means
一般相关均值下的成对比较AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要讨论的是同时置信区间与覆盖概率的统计推断理论,未涉及因果识别、面板、离散选择、时间序列或金融计量等具体领域细分,故不选择任何领域 key。
一般相关均值下的成对比较AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
A commonly occurring statistical inference problem in practice is that of making simultaneous comparisons among three or more treatment means μi (1 ≤ i ≤ k) for certain experimental designs. One way to do this, the T method proposed by Tukey (1953), constructs simultaneous confidence intervals for all pairwise differences of the treatment means μi – μj (1 ≤ i, j ≤ k, i ≈ j). The joint confidence level of these confidence intervals, however, depends in a very complicated fashion on the covariance structure of the treatment mean estimates μi , and, therefore, for designs where the covariance structure is not “simple,” the joint confidence level is not readily apparent. In general, this is the case for any unbalanced design or for designs in which the treatment mean estimates μi have unequal correlations. Tukey conjectured in 1953 that whatever the correlation structure of the treatment mean estimates μi , the T method would always provide a conservative set of confidence intervals, that is, that the actual joint confidence level of the confidence intervals would always be at least as great as the nominal joint confidence level 1 – α. In this article a discussion is undertaken of the evidence that the T method in general provides a conservative set of simultaneous confidence intervals. It is shown that the coverage probability of the simultaneous confidence intervals depends on the covariance structure only through the k(k − 1)/2 variances of the pairwise differences of the treatment mean estimates. A set of sufficient, but not necessary, conditions on these variances is given, which ensures that the T-method confidence intervals are conservative. In addition, the application of the T method to various common experimental designs that produce correlated treatment mean estimates is discussed. An integral expression is derived for calculating the exact joint confidence level of the T-method confidence intervals or for calculating confidence intervals of joint confidence level exactly equal to a given value. This expression is used to evaluate the coverage probabilities for a wide variety of covariance structures with k = 4. In each case considered, the T-method confidence intervals are conservative, and, furthermore, the amount of conservativeness is very small unless the population mean estimates have radically different variances and covariances.