跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要核心是一般多项式设定检验与非线性推断,工资方程仅作应用,未提供归入所列具体领域细分的充分证据。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Jin Seo Cho

利用解释变量幂变换序贯检验多项式模型假设

研究问题
如何检验回归模型的多项式设定是否充分,针对一般非线性备择进行推断,并以序贯检验确定未知多项式阶数?
方法与思路
作者推广基于解释变量幂变换的准似然比检验,处理多项式原假设下的多重识别问题,并通过序贯检验估计未知多项式阶数。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,方法给出渐近推断理论,并对一般非线性备择具有检验力;模拟显示未知阶数估计表现良好,应用指出标准明瑟工资方程存在误设。
阅读关注点
重点核对原假设下的识别困难、准似然比统计量的极限分布、序贯规则的误差控制,以及工资方程中教育和经验的非线性表示。
阅读边界
摘要未说明渐近理论的正则条件、序贯检验的整体错误率或模拟设计;工资方程误设的发现不能直接解释为教育或经验的因果效应。

原文摘要

Summary We provide a methodology for testing a polynomial model hypothesis by generalizing the approach and results of Baek, Cho, and Phillips ( Journal of Econometrics , 2015, 187 , 376–384; BCP), which test for neglected nonlinearity using power transforms of regressors against arbitrary nonlinearity. We use the BCP quasi‐likelihood ratio test and deal with the new multifold identification problem that arises under the null of the polynomial model. The approach leads to convenient asymptotic theory for inference, has omnibus power against general nonlinear alternatives, and allows estimation of an unknown polynomial degree in a model by way of sequential testing, a technique that is useful in the application of sieve approximations. Simulations show good performance in the sequential test procedure in both identifying and estimating unknown polynomial order. The approach, which can be used empirically to test for misspecification, is applied to a Mincer ( Journal of Political Economy , 1958, 66 , 281–302; Schooling, Experience and Earnings , Columbia University Press, 1974) equation using data from Card (in Christofides, Grant, and Swidinsky (Eds.), Aspects of Labour Market Behaviour: Essays in Honour of John Vanderkamp , University of Toronto Press, 1995, 201‐222) and Bierens and Ginther ( Empirical Economics , 2001, 26 , 307–324). The results confirm that the standard Mincer log earnings equation is readily shown to be misspecified. The applications consider different datasets and examine the impact of nonlinear effects of experience and schooling on earnings, allowing for flexibility in the respective polynomial representations.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文