跳到正文
简报说明

来源与收录范围

汇总期刊目录中的 16 个期刊来源,以及 arXiv 计量经济学与相关统计、金融分类和主题检索中的预印本。期刊题录主要来自 Crossref,可靠摘要保留补充来源;期刊官网链接可在论文检索的说明中核对。

保留计量方法研究、相关统计基础及实质涉及计量方法的应用、教程、比较和综述。待核验、范围外及撤回记录不进入公开简报。基础文献按学习与研究需要单独选编。

此前日简报及周、月简报按可核实的原站发表、首次提交和修订日期归档;历史补录只留在文献库。期刊仅纳入收录当月新发表或提前取得题录的论文;只有月份的记录仅进入对应月简报。arXiv 同期只计一次,首次发布优先;未保存的中间版本无法补算。撤回内容会同步移除;所有历史补录仍可在论文检索中查找。

当前结果:已发表 0 篇 · 待刊 0 篇 · 预印本 268 篇

关键词匹配标题、摘要、作者或 DOI;支持部分字母,多词同时匹配,双引号匹配短语。

本期动态按期刊、arXiv 首次发布、arXiv 修订分组,组内默认本文引用优先。也可选择作者引用优先或最新收录。

期刊论文在前,预印本在后。组内先看本文引用,再看已有明确关联作者的最高累计引用,最后按当前日期顺序排序。

“作者引用”指已有明确关联作者的最高累计引用,不合计共同作者。目前作者指标只来自有身份关联快照的预印本,普通期刊条目可能没有该项数据;本页 0/24 篇有可核验作者指标。

本文引用采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计版本;缺失不记作零。累计引用会随时间积累,可结合近年范围比较;引用数和作者发表经历是阅读线索,不代表论文质量或同行评审状态。

“作者发表记录”展示作者已有论文的可核验发表记录,不证明该预印本已接收或通过同行评审。

正常题录、可靠摘要和引用同步继续;AI 解读依据可靠材料,材料不足时保留待解读状态。

2 个来源同步延迟

本期 268 篇
导出

arXiv · 本期修订

Propensity Patchwork Kriging for Scalable Inference on Heterogeneous Treatment Effects

用于异质性处理效应可扩展推断的倾向得分拼接克里金

Gaussian process-based models are attractive for estimating heterogeneous treatment effects (HTE), but their computational cost limits scalability in causal inference settings. In this work, we address this challenge by extending Patchwork Kriging into the causal inference framework. Our proposed method partitions the data according to the estimated propensity score and applies Patchwork Kriging to enforce continuity of HTE estimates across adjacent regions. By imposing…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Horseshoe Forests for High-Dimensional Causal Survival Analysis

用于高维因果生存分析的马蹄先验森林

We develop a Bayesian tree ensemble model to estimate heterogeneous treatment effects in censored survival data with high-dimensional covariates. Instead of imposing sparsity through the tree structure, we place a horseshoe prior directly on the step heights to achieve adaptive global-local shrinkage. This strategy allows flexible regularisation and reduces noise. We develop a reversible jump Gibbs sampler to accommodate the non-conjugate horseshoe prior within the tree…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Inverse Reinforcement Learning with Just Classification and a Few Regressions

仅用分类与少量回归实现逆强化学习

Inverse reinforcement learning (IRL) aims to infer rewards from observed behavior, but rewards are not identified from the policy alone: many reward--value pairs can rationalize the same actions. Meaningful reward recovery therefore requires a normalization, yet existing normalized IRL methods often rely on anchor-action restrictions or specialized neural architectures. We study reward recovery in the maximum-entropy, or Gumbel-shock, model under a broad class of statewise…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Econometric vs. Causal Structure-Learning for Time-Series Policy Decisions: Evidence from the UK COVID-19 Policies

时间序列政策决策中的计量方法与因果结构学习:英国新冠政策证据

Causal machine learning (ML) recovers graphical structures that inform us about potential cause-and-effect relationships. Most progress has focused on cross-sectional data with no explicit time order, whereas recovering causal structures from time series data remains the subject of ongoing research in causal ML. In addition to traditional causal ML, this study assesses econometric methods that some argue can recover causal structures from time series data. The use of these…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Balancing Covariates in Survey Experiments

调查实验中的协变量平衡

The survey experiment is widely used in economics and social sciences to evaluate the effects of treatments or programs. In a standard population-based survey experiment, the experimenter randomly draws experimental units from a target population of interest and then randomly assigns the sampled units to treatment or control conditions to explore the treatment effect of an intervention. Simple random sampling and treatment assignment can balance covariates on average.…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Inference on Variable Importance for Treatment Effect Heterogeneity: Shapley Values and Beyond

处理效应异质性的变量重要性推断:Shapley 值及其拓展

We provide an inferential framework to assess variable importance for heterogeneous treatment effects. This assessment is especially useful in high-risk domains such as medicine, where decision makers hesitate to rely on black-box treatment recommendation algorithms. The variable importance measures we consider are local in that they may differ across individuals, while the inference is global in that it tests whether a given variable is important for any individual. Our…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Multi-environment Invariance Learning with Missing Data

结果缺失下的多环境不变性学习

Learning models that can handle distribution shifts is a key challenge in domain generalization. Invariance learning, an approach that focuses on identifying features invariant across environments, improves model generalization by capturing stable relationships, which may represent causal effects when the data distribution is encoded within a structural equation model (SEM) and satisfies modularity conditions. This has led to a growing body of work that builds on invariance…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Extracting Mechanisms from Heterogeneous Effects: An Identification Strategy for Mediation Analysis

从异质性效应中提取机制:中介分析的识别策略

Understanding causal mechanisms is crucial for explaining and generalizing empirical phenomena. Causal mediation analysis offers statistical techniques to quantify the mediation effects. Although numerous methods have been developed for causal inference more broadly, the methodological toolkit for causal mediation analysis remains limited. Current methods often require multiple ignorability assumptions or sophisticated research designs. In this paper, we introduce an…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Causal Discovery Should Embrace the Wisdom of the Crowd

因果发现应拥抱群体智慧

This paper argues for recognizing an emerging paradigm of causal learning by wisdom of the crowd. Recent developments in government, industry, and research point to the rise of decentralized and crowd-based approaches within causal modeling, where causal knowledge distributed across many contributors can be systematically elicited and integrated with causal learning workflows. In this paradigm, causal learning becomes a distributed decision-making problem: each participant…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Comparing Two Proxy Methods for Causal Identification

两类代理变量因果识别方法的比较

Identifying causal effects in the presence of unmeasured variables is a fundamental challenge in causal inference, for which proxy variable methods have emerged as a powerful solution. We contrast two major approaches in this framework: (1) bridge equation methods, which leverage solutions to integral equations to recover causal targets, and (2) array decomposition methods, which recover latent factors used to identify counterfactual quantities via eigendecomposition tasks.…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Generalized optimal parameter-transfer learning through Mallows-type model averaging

通过 Mallows 型模型平均实现广义最优参数迁移学习

In many economic applications, multiple source datasets are available, but their effective combination is challenging due to heterogeneity across datasets. To address this problem, we study a parameter-transfer framework that shares only source-side estimates and propose a Mallows-type model averaging method for combining target and source models in the parametric setting. The weights are obtained from a Mallows-type criterion that is unbiased for the target prediction risk…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Asymptotic Properties of the Distributional Synthetic Controls

分布合成控制的渐近性质

As an alternative to synthetic control, the distributional Synthetic Control (DSC) proposed by Gunsilius (2023) provides estimates for quantile treatment effect and thus enabling researchers to comprehensively understand the impact of interventions in causal inference. But the asymptotic properties of DSC have not been built. In this paper, we first establish the DSC estimator's asymptotic optimality in the essence that the treatment effect estimator given by DSC achieves…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Proximal Inference for Indirect and Intervening Effects in Population Interventions

人口干预中间接效应与干预变量效应的近端推断

Unmeasured confounding, unethical exposure, and ill-defined interventions pose significant challenges to evaluating policy-relevant mediation estimands in medicine and public health. In observational studies involving harmful exposures, the population intervention indirect effect (PIIE) is often more salient than the natural indirect effect, as the latter relies on hypothetical interventions that may be ethically or practically unfeasible. While the PIIE can be identified…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Bias-Variance Tradeoff of Matching Prior to Difference-in-Differences When Parallel Trends is Violated

平行趋势违反时双重差分前匹配的偏差—方差权衡

Quasi-experimental causal inference methods have become central in empirical operations management for guiding managerial decisions. Among these, empiricists utilize the Difference-in-Differences (DiD) estimator, which relies on the parallel trends assumption. To improve its plausibility, researchers often match treated and control units before applying DiD, with the intuition that matched groups are more likely to evolve similarly absent treatment. Existing work that…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Ice Cream Doesn't Cause Drowning: Benchmarking LLMs Against Statistical Pitfalls in Causal Inference

冰淇淋不会导致溺水:评测大语言模型应对因果推断统计陷阱的能力

Reliable causal inference is essential for making decisions in high-stakes areas like medicine, economics, and public policy. However, it remains unclear whether large language models (LLMs) can handle rigorous and trustworthy statistical causal inference. Current benchmarks usually involve simplified tasks. For example, these tasks might only ask LLMs to identify semantic causal relationships or draw conclusions directly from raw data. As a result, models may overlook…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Testing the Significance of the Difference-in-Differences Coefficient via Doubly Randomised Inference

通过双重随机化推断检验双重差分系数的显著性

This article develops a significance test for the Difference-in-Differences (DiD) estimator based on dual-margin randomization, in which both the treatment and time indicators are independently permuted to generate an empirical null distribution of the DiD estimator. We situate the proposal explicitly within the landscape of existing inference methods for the DiD estimator, including OLS-based $t$-tests, heteroskedasticity-robust standard errors, cluster-robust variance…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Tipping Point Sensitivity Analysis for Missing Data in Time-to-Event Endpoints: Model-Based and Ad hoc Approaches

事件时间终点缺失数据的临界点敏感性分析:模型法与经验法

Treatment policy estimands are frequently favored by regulators, as they assess the effect of treatment assignment regardless of post-randomization events. Despite best efforts, missing data due to study discontinuation cannot be fully avoided and, for time-to-event endpoints, typically manifests as right censoring. Study discontinuation is often more likely following intercurrent events, particularly when it coincides with treatment discontinuation, raising concerns about…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Reluctant Transfer Learning in Penalized Regressions for Individualized Treatment Rules under Effect Heterogeneity

效应异质性下个体化治疗规则的惩罚回归审慎迁移学习

Estimating individualized treatment rules (ITRs) is fundamental to precision medicine, where the goal is to tailor treatment decisions to individual patient characteristics. While numerous methods have been developed for ITR estimation, there is limited research on model updating that accounts for shifted treatment-covariate relationships in the ITR setting. In practice, models trained on source data must be updated for new (target) datasets that exhibit shifts in treatment…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Causal Multi-Task Demand Learning

因果多任务需求学习

We study a canonical multi-task demand-learning problem motivated by retail pricing, where a firm seeks to estimate heterogeneous linear price-response functions across multiple decision contexts. Each context is described by rich covariates but exhibits limited price variation, motivating transfer learning across tasks. A central challenge in leveraging cross-task transfer is endogeneity: prices may be arbitrarily correlated with unobserved task-level demand determinants…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Individualized Treatment Allocation in Sequential Network Games

序贯网络博弈中的个体化处理分配

Designing individualized allocation of treatments so as to maximize the equilibrium welfare of interacting agents has many policy-relevant applications. Focusing on sequential decision games of interacting agents, this paper develops a method to obtain optimal treatment assignment rules that maximize a social welfare criterion by evaluating stationary distributions of outcomes. Stationary distributions in sequential decision games are given by Gibbs distributions, which are…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Finite-sample bias-variance tradeoff with variables related to trial participation inserted into causal forest models for ensuring generalizability

因果森林纳入试验参与变量时的有限样本偏差—方差权衡

Estimating conditional average treatment effects (CATE) from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and generalizing them to broader populations is essential for personalizing treatment rules but is complicated by selection bias due to trial participation and potentially high dimensional covariates. We evaluated finite sample bias variance tradeoff for Causal Forest based CATE estimation strategies to address the selection bias. Identification theory suggests unbiased CATE…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Closed-form estimation and inference for panels with attrition and refreshment samples

存在样本流失与补充样本的面板数据闭式估计与推断

It has long been established that, if a panel dataset suffers from attrition, auxiliary (refreshment) sampling restores full identification under additional assumptions that still allow for nontrivial attrition mechanisms. Such identification results rely on implausible assumptions about the attrition process or lead to theoretically and computationally challenging estimation procedures. We propose an alternative identifying assumption that, despite its nonparametric nature,…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Bipartite causal inference with interference, time series data, and a random network

具有干扰、时间序列数据与随机网络的二部因果推断

In bipartite causal inference with interference, interventional units might receive treatment or control, and they might affect the outcome of outcome units through their connections on a bipartite network. We study bipartite causal inference with interference based on observational data across time and a changing bipartite network. Under an exposure mapping framework, we define the immediate and carryover causal effects for each outcome unit, representing contrasts of…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

A subgroup-aware scoring approach to the study of effect modification in observational studies

观察研究中效应修饰的子群感知评分方法

Effect modification means the size of a treatment effect varies with an observed covariate. Generally speaking, a larger treatment effect with more stable error terms is less sensitive to bias. Thus, we might be able to conclude that a study is less sensitive to unmeasured bias by using these subgroups experiencing larger treatment effects. Lee et al. (2018) proposed the submax method that leverages the joint distribution of test statistics from subgroups to draw a firmer…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓