跳到正文
简报说明

来源与收录范围

汇总期刊目录中的 16 个期刊来源,以及 arXiv 计量经济学与相关统计、金融分类和主题检索中的预印本。期刊题录主要来自 Crossref,可靠摘要保留补充来源;期刊官网链接可在论文检索的说明中核对。

保留计量方法研究、相关统计基础及实质涉及计量方法的应用、教程、比较和综述。待核验、范围外及撤回记录不进入公开简报。基础文献按学习与研究需要单独选编。

此前日简报及周、月简报按可核实的原站发表、首次提交和修订日期归档;历史补录只留在文献库。期刊仅纳入收录当月新发表或提前取得题录的论文;只有月份的记录仅进入对应月简报。arXiv 同期只计一次,首次发布优先;未保存的中间版本无法补算。撤回内容会同步移除;所有历史补录仍可在论文检索中查找。

当前结果:已发表 0 篇 · 待刊 0 篇 · 预印本 211 篇

关键词匹配标题、摘要、作者或 DOI;支持部分字母,多词同时匹配,双引号匹配短语。

本期动态按期刊、arXiv 首次发布、arXiv 修订分组,组内默认本文引用优先。也可选择作者引用优先或最新收录。

期刊论文在前,预印本在后。组内先看本文引用,再看已有明确关联作者的最高累计引用,最后按当前日期顺序排序。

“作者引用”指已有明确关联作者的最高累计引用,不合计共同作者。目前作者指标只来自有身份关联快照的预印本,普通期刊条目可能没有该项数据;本页 0/19 篇有可核验作者指标。

本文引用采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计版本;缺失不记作零。累计引用会随时间积累,可结合近年范围比较;引用数和作者发表经历是阅读线索,不代表论文质量或同行评审状态。

“作者发表记录”展示作者已有论文的可核验发表记录,不证明该预印本已接收或通过同行评审。

正常题录、可靠摘要和引用同步继续;AI 解读依据可靠材料,材料不足时保留待解读状态。

本期 211 篇
导出

arXiv · 本期修订

Predicted Incrementality by Experimentation (PIE) for Ad Measurement

基于实验预测广告增量效果:PIE 广告衡量方法

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) provide the most credible estimates of advertising incrementality but are difficult to scale. We propose Predicted Incrementality by Experimentation (PIE), which reframes ad measurement as a campaign-level prediction problem. PIE uses a sample of RCTs to learn a mapping from campaign features to causal effects, then applies it to campaigns not run as RCTs. Because the RCTs identify the causal effects, PIE can incorporate post-determined…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Nonparametric estimation of the total treatment effect with multiple outcomes in the presence of terminal events

终末事件存在时多结局总处理效应的非参数估计

As standards of care advance, patients are living longer and once-fatal diseases are becoming manageable. Clinical trials increasingly focus on reducing disease burden, which can be quantified by the timing and occurrence of multiple non-fatal clinical events. Most existing methods for the analysis of multiple event-time data require stringent modeling assumptions that can be difficult to verify empirically, leading to treatment efficacy estimates that forego…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Partially Functional Dynamic Backdoor Diffusion-based Causal Model

部分函数型动态后门扩散因果模型

Causal inference in spatio-temporal settings is critically hindered by unmeasured confounders with complex spatio-temporal dynamics and the prevalence of multi-resolution data. While diffusion models present a promising avenue for estimating structural causal models, existing approaches are limited by assumptions of causal sufficiency or static confounding, failing to capture the region-specific, temporally dependent nature of real-world latent variables or to directly…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Nonparametric tests of treatment effect homogeneity for policy-makers

面向政策制定者的处理效应同质性非参数检验

Recent work has focused on nonparametric estimation of conditional treatment effects, but inference has remained relatively unexplored. We propose a class of nonparametric tests for both quantitative and qualitative treatment effect heterogeneity. The tests can incorporate a variety of structured assumptions on the conditional average treatment effect, allow for both continuous and discrete covariates, and do not require sample splitting to obtain a tractable asymptotic null…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Efficient collaborative learning of the average treatment effect

平均处理效应的高效协作学习

In response to the growing need for generating real-world evidence from multi-site collaborative studies, we introduce an efficient collaborative learning approach to evaluate average treatment effect (ECO-ATE) in a multi-site setting under data sharing constraints. Specifically, ECO-ATE operates in a federated manner, using individual-level data from a user-defined target population and summary statistics from other source populations, to construct efficient estimator for…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Quantifying Individual Risk for Binary Outcomes

二元结果下的个体风险量化

Understanding treatment effect heterogeneity is crucial for reliable decision-making in treatment evaluation and selection. The conditional average treatment effect (CATE) is widely used to capture treatment effect heterogeneity induced by observed covariates and to design individualized treatment policies. However, it is an average metric within subpopulations, which prevents it from revealing individual risk, potentially leading to misleading results. This article fills…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Valid post-selection inference for penalized G-estimation

惩罚 G 估计的有效选择后推断

Understanding treatment effect heterogeneity is important for decision making in medical and clinical practices, or handling various engineering and marketing challenges. When dealing with high-dimensional covariates or when the effect modifiers are not predefined and need to be discovered, data-adaptive selection approaches become essential. However, with data-driven model selection, the quantification of statistical uncertainty is complicated by post-selection inference…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Detection Boundaries for Panel Slope Homogeneity Tests Under Small-Group Heterogeneity

小群体异质性下的面板斜率同质性检验检测边界

Empirical researchers often use slope-homogeneity tests to assess whether slopes can be treated as common across units. A key difficulty is that heterogeneity may be concentrated in a small number of units, so that a failure to reject homogeneity may reflect limited power rather than true homogeneity. We quantify this issue by analyzing the power of standard slope-homogeneity tests under doubly local alternatives - alternatives in which only small groups of units depart from…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

The Promises of Multiple Experiments: Identifying Joint Distribution of Potential Outcomes

多个实验的潜力:识别潜在结果的联合分布

Typical causal effects are defined based on the marginal distribution of potential outcomes. However, many real-world applications require causal estimands involving the joint distribution of potential outcomes to enable more nuanced treatment evaluation and selection. In this article, we propose a novel framework for identifying and estimating the joint distribution of potential outcomes using multiple experimental datasets. We introduce the assumption of transportability…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Profit-Aligned CATE Estimation: Reconciling Policy Learning and Inference

与利润目标一致的条件平均处理效应估计:协调政策学习与推断

We propose a framework that aligns Conditional Average Treatment Effect (CATE) estimation with profit maximization. Our method recognizes that, for customers with extreme treatment effects, additional estimation accuracy is unlikely to change the recommended actions. In contrast, accuracy is critical near the decision boundary, where treatment effects are close to treatment costs. Our approach optimizes a novel objective function that concentrates learning capacity along…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Complier General Causal Effect in Randomized Controlled Trials with One-Sided Noncompliance

单侧不依从随机对照试验中的依从者一般因果效应

A randomized controlled trial (RCT) is widely regarded as the gold standard for assessing the causal effect of a treatment or intervention, assuming perfect implementation. In practice, however, randomization can be compromised for various reasons, such as one-sided noncompliance. In this paper, we first systematically study the likelihood-based identifiability in an RCT with one-sided noncompliance. This foundational analysis naturally gives rise to the complier general…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Causal Meta-Analysis: Rethinking the Foundations of Evidence-Based Medicine

因果元分析:重新审视循证医学的基础

Meta-analysis, by synthesizing effect estimates from multiple studies conducted in diverse settings, stands at the top of the evidence hierarchy in clinical research. Yet, conventional approaches based on fixed- or random-effects models lack a causal framework, which may limit their interpretability and utility for public policy. Incorporating causal inference reframes meta-analysis as the estimation of well-defined causal effects on clearly specified populations, enabling a…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Integrating behavioral experimental findings into dynamical models to inform social change interventions

将行为实验发现融入动态模型以设计社会变革干预

Addressing global challenges often involves stimulating the large-scale adoption of new products or behaviors. Research traditions that focus on individual decision making suggest that achieving this objective requires identifying the drivers of individual discrete adoption choices. On the other hand, computational approaches rooted in complexity science focus on maximizing the propagation of a given product or behavior throughout social networks of interconnected adopters.…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Identification and estimation of dynamic random coefficient models

动态随机系数模型的识别与估计

I study linear panel data models with predetermined regressors (such as lagged dependent variables) where coefficients are individual-specific, allowing for heterogeneity in the effects of the regressors on the dependent variable. I show that the model is not point-identified in a short panel context but rather partially identified, and I characterize the identified sets for the mean, variance, and CDF of the coefficient distribution. This characterization is general,…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Post-treatment problems: What can we say about the effect of a treatment among sub-groups who (would) respond in some way?

处理后分组问题:如何分析会对处理作出特定反应者的效应

Investigators are often interested in how a treatment affects an outcome for units responding to treatment in a certain way. We may wish to know the effect among units that, for example, meaningfully implemented an intervention, passed an attention check, or demonstrated some important mechanistic response. Simply conditioning on the observed value of the post-treatment variable introduces problematic biases. Further, the identification assumptions required of several…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Assignment at the Frontier: Identifying the Frontier Structural Function and Bounding Mean Deviations

前沿处配置:前沿结构函数识别与平均偏离界限

This paper analyzes a model in which an outcome equals a frontier function of inputs minus a nonnegative unobserved deviation. The inputs may be endogenous (statistically dependent on the deviation). If zero lies in the support of the deviation given the inputs -- an assumption we term assignment at the frontier -- then the frontier is identified by the supremum of the outcome given those inputs, obviating the need for instruments. We then consider estimation with random…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Difference-in-differences with as few as two cross-sectional units -- A new perspective to the democracy-growth debate

仅需两个截面单位的双重差分:民主与增长的新视角

Pooled panel analyses often mask heterogeneity in unit-specific treatment effects. This challenge, for example, crops up in studies of the impact of democracy on economic growth, where findings vary substantially due to differences in country composition. To address this challenge, this paper introduces the Temporal Difference-in-Differences (T-DiD) estimator that leverages temporal variation in the data to estimate unit-specific average treatment effects on the treated…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

A Latent Factor Panel Approach to Spatiotemporal Causal Inference

时空因果推断的潜在因子面板方法

Unmeasured confounding can severely bias causal effect estimates from spatiotemporal observational data, especially when the confounders do not vary smoothly in time and space. In this work, we develop a method for addressing unmeasured confounding in spatiotemporal contexts by building on models from the panel data literature and methods in multivariate causal inference. Our method is based on a factor confounding assumption, which posits that effects of unmeasured…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Everything all at once: On choosing an estimand for multi-component environmental exposures

多成分环境暴露的目标量选择:联合位移如何定义

Many research questions -- particularly those in environmental health -- do not involve binary exposures. In environmental epidemiology, this includes multivariate exposure mixtures with nondiscrete components. Causal inference estimands and estimators to quantify the relationship between an exposure mixture and an outcome are relatively few. We propose an approach to quantify a relationship between a shift in the exposure mixture and the outcome -- either in the single…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓