跳到正文
简报说明

来源与收录范围

汇总期刊目录中的 16 个期刊来源,以及 arXiv 计量经济学与相关统计、金融分类和主题检索中的预印本。期刊题录主要来自 Crossref,可靠摘要保留补充来源;期刊官网链接可在论文检索的说明中核对。

保留计量方法研究、相关统计基础及实质涉及计量方法的应用、教程、比较和综述。待核验、范围外及撤回记录不进入公开简报。基础文献按学习与研究需要单独选编。

此前日简报及周、月简报按可核实的原站发表、首次提交和修订日期归档;历史补录只留在文献库。期刊仅纳入收录当月新发表或提前取得题录的论文;只有月份的记录仅进入对应月简报。arXiv 同期只计一次,首次发布优先;未保存的中间版本无法补算。撤回内容会同步移除;所有历史补录仍可在论文检索中查找。

当前结果:已发表 0 篇 · 待刊 0 篇 · 预印本 186 篇

关键词匹配标题、摘要、作者或 DOI;支持部分字母,多词同时匹配,双引号匹配短语。

本期动态按期刊、arXiv 首次发布、arXiv 修订分组,组内默认本文引用优先。也可选择作者引用优先或最新收录。

期刊论文在前,预印本在后。组内先看本文引用,再看已有明确关联作者的最高累计引用,最后按当前日期顺序排序。

“作者引用”指已有明确关联作者的最高累计引用,不合计共同作者。目前作者指标只来自有身份关联快照的预印本,普通期刊条目可能没有该项数据;本页 0/24 篇有可核验作者指标。

本文引用采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计版本;缺失不记作零。累计引用会随时间积累,可结合近年范围比较;引用数和作者发表经历是阅读线索,不代表论文质量或同行评审状态。

“作者发表记录”展示作者已有论文的可核验发表记录,不证明该预印本已接收或通过同行评审。

正常题录、可靠摘要和引用同步继续;AI 解读依据可靠材料,材料不足时保留待解读状态。

2 个来源同步延迟

本期 186 篇
导出

arXiv · 本期首次发布

Heterogeneity in peer effects for binary outcomes

二元结果中的异质同伴效应

I introduce heterogeneity into the analysis of peer effects arising from conformity by allowing peer-effect parameters to vary across agents' actions. Using a structural model based on a simultaneous network game with incomplete information, I derive conditions that guarantee the uniqueness of the equilibrium and the identification of heterogeneous peer-effect parameters. Applying the model to data on smoking and alcohol consumption among secondary school students, and…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Leniency Designs: An Operator's Manual

宽严度设计:操作指南

We develop a step-by-step guide to leniency (a.k.a. judge or examiner instrument) designs, drawing on recent econometric literatures. The unbiased jackknife instrumental variables estimator (UJIVE) is purpose-built for leveraging exogenous leniency variation, avoiding subtle biases even in the presence of many decision-makers or controls. We show how UJIVE can also be used to assess key assumptions underlying leniency designs, including quasi-random assignment and average…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

A Unified Graphical Criterion for Characterizing the Causal Interpretation of Partial Regression Coefficients in Linear Structural Equation Models

线性结构方程模型中偏回归系数因果解释的统一图判据

This paper provides a graph-based characterization of partial regression coefficients in linear structural equation models. First, we derive a generalized graphical criterion that unifies the d-separation, single-door, and back-door criteria. This criterion provides a generically necessary and sufficient condition under which a partial regression coefficient coincides with a linear causal effect that is not mediated by other explanatory variables. Second, we clarify the…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

A Sensitivity Analysis Framework for Causal Inference Under Interference

存在个体间干扰时的因果推断敏感性分析框架

In many applications of causal inference, the treatment received by one unit may influence the outcome of another, a phenomenon referred to as interference. Although there are several frameworks for conducting causal inference in the presence of interference, practitioners often lack the data necessary to adjust for its effects. In this paper, we propose a weighting-based sensitivity analysis framework that can be used to assess the systematic bias arising from ignoring…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Possibilistic Instrumental Variable Regression with Potentially Invalid Instruments

允许工具变量潜在无效的可能性理论回归

Instrumental variable regression is a common approach for causal inference in the presence of unobserved confounding. However, identifying valid instruments is often difficult in practice. In this paper, we propose a novel method based on possibility theory that performs posterior inference on the treatment effect, conditional on a user-specified set of potential violations of the instrument exogeneity assumption. Our method can provide valid results even when only a single,…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Uniform inference for kernel instrumental variable regression

核工具变量回归的一致推断

Instrumental variable regression is a foundational tool for causal analysis across the social and biomedical sciences. Recent advances use kernel methods to estimate nonparametric causal relationships, with general data types, while retaining a simple closed-form expression. Empirical researchers ultimately need reliable inference on causal estimates; however, uniform confidence sets for the method remain unavailable. To fill this gap, we develop valid and sharp confidence…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Difference-in-differences with stochastic policy shifts of a continuous treatment

连续处理随机政策变动下的双重差分

Treatment effects of stochastic policy shifts quantify differences in outcomes across counterfactual scenarios with varying treatment distributions. Stochastic policy shifts may be of interest in settings where it is unrealistic or infeasible to deterministically manipulate treatments. In this paper, methods are developed to draw inference about stochastic policy effects under difference-in-differences (DiD) designs with a continuous treatment. The proposed causal estimand…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Interpretable Discovery from Unstructured Data: A High-Dimensional Approach

We propose an automatic, general-purpose framework for making discoveries from unstructured data (e.g., text data from open-ended surveys of economic beliefs). The framework leverages recent methods from the literature on AI interpretability to transform unstructured datasets into high-dimensional, structured datasets of interpretable concept measurements; specifies concept-level parameters and null hypotheses based on this transformed dataset; tests these hypotheses using…

阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Treatment effect estimation by comparing observed and predicted outcomes: conditions for valid inference and practical illustration

比较观测与预测结果估计处理效应:有效推断条件与实践示例

Prediction models developed before the introduction of a new treatment may be used to estimate treatment effects of newly introduced treatments. One approach, known as model-based clinical evaluation in radiotherapy, does this by comparing observed outcomes under a new treatment with predicted outcomes had these patients received the standard treatment. This article clarifies the relevant conditions needed for valid average treatment effect estimation using this approach,…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Improving control over unobservables with network data

利用网络数据改进对不可观测因素的控制

This paper develops a method to conduct causal inference in the presence of unobserved confounders by leveraging networks with homophily, a frequently observed tendency to form edges with similar nodes. I introduce a concept of asymptotic homophily, according to which individuals' selectivity scales with the size of the potential connection pool. The resulting network formation model accommodates common empirical features such as homophily, degree heterogeneity, sparsity,…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Robust Inference Methods for Latent Group Panel Models under Possible Group Non-Separation

潜在分组可能无法分离时面板模型的稳健推断

We develop robust inference methods for general linear hypotheses in linear panel data models with latent group structure in the coefficients. We employ a selective conditional inference approach based on the conditional distribution of coefficient estimates given the group structure estimated from the data. The resulting inference procedures remain valid even when group separation fails (i.e., when the distributional properties of the group-specific coefficients are not…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Low-Rank Estimation of Nonlinear Panel Data Models

非线性面板数据模型的低秩估计

This paper investigates nonlinear panel models with interactive fixed effects and introduces a general framework for parameter estimation under potentially nonconvex objective functions. We propose a computationally feasible two-step estimation procedure. In the first step, nuclear-norm regularization (NNR) is used to obtain preliminary estimators of the coefficients of interest, factors, and factor loadings. The second step involves an iterative procedure for post-NNR…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Conditional Selective Inference for the Selected Groups in Panel Data

面板数据中所选群组的条件选择后推断

We consider the problem of testing for differences in group-specific slopes between the selected groups in panel data identified via k-means clustering. In this setting, the classical Wald-type test statistic is problematic because it produces an extremely inflated type I error probability. The underlying reason is that the same dataset is used to identify the group structure and construct the test statistic, simultaneously. This creates dependence between the selection and…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Differentially Private Tests of Fisher's Sharp Null Hypothesis for Binary Outcomes

二元结局下 Fisher 尖锐零假设的差分隐私检验

Across many disciplines, causal inference often relies on randomized experiments with binary outcomes. In such experiments, often analysts are interested in testing Fisher's sharp null hypothesis, i.e., the treatment has zero effect on the outcome for every study subject. Sometimes the outcomes are sensitive and must be kept confidential, for example, when they comprise physical or mental health measurements. Releasing test statistics or p-values computed with the…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Principled analysis of crossover designs: causal effects, efficient estimation, and robust inference

交叉设计的系统分析:因果效应、有效估计与稳健推断

Crossover designs randomly assign each unit to receive a sequence of treatments. By comparing outcomes within the same unit, these designs can effectively eliminate between-unit variation and facilitate the identification of both instantaneous effects of current treatments and carryover effects from past treatments. They are widely used in traditional biomedical studies and are increasingly adopted in modern digital platforms. However, standard analyses of crossover designs…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Integrating RCTs, RWD, AI/ML and Statistics: Next-Generation Evidence Synthesis

整合随机试验、真实世界数据、人工智能与统计学:下一代证据综合

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs)have been the cornerstone of clinical evidence; however, their cost, duration, and restrictive eligibility criteria limit power and external validity. Studies using real-world data (RWD), historically considered less reliable for establishing causality, are now recognized as an important source of real-world evidence (RWE). In parallel, artificial intelligence and machine learning (AI/ML) are increasingly used throughout the drug…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Synthetic Control with Weight Uncertainty: Robust Identification and Statistical Inference

权重不确定性下的合成控制:稳健识别与统计推断

The synthetic control method estimates causal effects by comparing a treated unit with weighted controls matched on its pre-treatment trajectory. However, validity can be compromised when highly correlated controls leave the synthetic weights weakly determined or when treated-control relationships shift after treatment. We propose a new estimand, the weight-robust treatment effect, defined as the optimizer of a worst-case optimization problem over an uncertainty class of…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Calibrated Bayes analysis of cluster-randomized trials

整群随机试验的校准贝叶斯分析

In cluster-randomized trials (CRTs), entire clusters of individuals are randomized to treatment, and outcomes within a cluster are typically correlated. While frequentist approaches are standard practice for CRT analysis, Bayesian methods have emerged as a strong alternative. Previous work has investigated the use of Bayesian hierarchical models for continuous, binary, and count outcomes in CRTs, but these approaches focus on model-based treatment effect coefficients as the…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Distributional Treatment Effect Transportability across Heterogeneous Sites

异质场所之间分布处理效应的可迁移性

We study distributional transportability of treatment effects in a ``cross-site, one-armed target" design, where both treated and control units are observed in a source site, but only control units are observed in a target site. Our object of interest is not estimating the average treatment effect, but recovering the full treated distribution in the target site using transfer knowledge from the source site, while allowing cross-site heterogeneity in measurement systems,…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Identification Design

识别设计

This paper introduces a model of identification design in which the decision maker observes the population distribution of signals generated by an information structure and ranks actions by their worst-case payoff over the admissible state distributions consistent with those signals. The environment is manipulable if every action is implementable under every admissible distribution of the state variable, and strongly so if this is achievable via almost fully informative…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Hierarchical Causal Structure Learning

分层因果结构学习

Traditional statistical approaches primarily model associations between variables, however many scientific and practical questions require causal methods instead. These methods typically rely on assumptions about an underlying structure and are often represented by a Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG). While causal structures can be learned for single-level data, hierarchical or multi-level settings, where units (e.g., plants, students or patients) are nested within groups (e.g.,…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Efficient estimation of weighted treatment effects under two-phase sampling

两阶段抽样下加权处理效应的有效估计

Two-phase sampling offers a practical way to collect costly confounders only in a subsample while retaining inexpensive information for a larger cohort. In observational causal studies, however, phase-2 selection can distort estimation of population causal effects if the sampling mechanism is ignored, and available phase-1 information may also be exploited to improve efficiency. Yet efficiency theory for causal estimands under such designs remains limited, particularly…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Experimental Site Selection under Directional Distribution Shifts

方向性分布偏移下的实验地点选择

Multi-site studies are widely used across the social sciences, education, and medicine to learn the effects of interventions across heterogeneous populations. But deployment populations, on which a given intervention is implemented, may differ systematically from the experimental population on which the intervention is evaluated. I propose a method for selecting sites with minimax guarantees against directional distribution shifts, which allows the researcher to guard…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Improving Variance and Confidence Interval Estimation in Small-Sample Propensity Score Analyses: Bootstrap vs. Asymptotic Methods

小样本倾向得分分析的方差与置信区间:自助法和渐近方法比较

Propensity score (PS) methods are widely used to estimate treatment effects in non-randomized studies. Variance is typically estimated using sandwich or bootstrap methods, which can either treat the PS as estimated or fixed. The latter is thought to be conservative. Comparisons between the sandwich and bootstrap estimators have been compared in moderate to large sample sizes, favoring the bootstrap estimator. With the growing interest in treatments for rare disease and…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓