跳到正文
简报说明

来源与收录范围

汇总期刊目录中的 16 个期刊来源,以及 arXiv 计量经济学与相关统计、金融分类和主题检索中的预印本。期刊题录主要来自 Crossref,可靠摘要保留补充来源;期刊官网链接可在论文检索的说明中核对。

保留计量方法研究、相关统计基础及实质涉及计量方法的应用、教程、比较和综述。待核验、范围外及撤回记录不进入公开简报。基础文献按学习与研究需要单独选编。

此前日简报及周、月简报按可核实的原站发表、首次提交和修订日期归档;历史补录只留在文献库。期刊仅纳入收录当月新发表或提前取得题录的论文;只有月份的记录仅进入对应月简报。arXiv 同期只计一次,首次发布优先;未保存的中间版本无法补算。撤回内容会同步移除;所有历史补录仍可在论文检索中查找。

当前结果:已发表 0 篇 · 待刊 0 篇 · 预印本 184 篇

关键词匹配标题、摘要、作者或 DOI;支持部分字母,多词同时匹配,双引号匹配短语。

本期动态按期刊、arXiv 首次发布、arXiv 修订分组,组内默认本文引用优先。也可选择作者引用优先或最新收录。

期刊论文在前,预印本在后。组内先看本文引用,再看已有明确关联作者的最高累计引用,最后按当前日期顺序排序。

“作者引用”指已有明确关联作者的最高累计引用,不合计共同作者。目前作者指标只来自有身份关联快照的预印本,普通期刊条目可能没有该项数据;本页 0/24 篇有可核验作者指标。

本文引用采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计版本;缺失不记作零。累计引用会随时间积累,可结合近年范围比较;引用数和作者发表经历是阅读线索,不代表论文质量或同行评审状态。

“作者发表记录”展示作者已有论文的可核验发表记录,不证明该预印本已接收或通过同行评审。

正常题录、可靠摘要和引用同步继续;AI 解读依据可靠材料,材料不足时保留待解读状态。

本期 184 篇
导出

arXiv · 本期首次发布

Neumann-series corrections for regression adjustment in randomized experiments

随机实验回归调整的 Neumann 级数修正

We study average treatment effect (ATE) estimation under complete randomization with many covariates in a design-based, finite-population framework. In randomized experiments, regression adjustment can improve precision of estimators using covariates, without requiring a correctly specified outcome model. However, existing design-based analyses establish asymptotic normality only up to $p = o(n^{1/2})$, extendable to $p = o(n^{2/3})$ with a single de-biasing. We introduce a…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Modelos Empiricos de Pos-Dupla Selecao por LASSO: Discussoes para Estudos do Transporte Aereo

Lasso 后双重选择的实证模型:航空运输研究讨论

This paper presents and discusses forms of estimation by regularized regression and model selection using the LASSO method - Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator. LASSO is recognized as one of the main supervised learning methods applied to high-dimensional econometrics, allowing work with large volumes of data and multiple correlated controls. Conceptual issues related to the consequences of high dimensionality in modern econometrics and the principle of…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Multiple Treatments Causal Effects Estimation with Task Embeddings and Balanced Representation Learning

结合任务嵌入与平衡表示学习的多处理因果效应估计

The simultaneous application of multiple treatments is increasingly common in many fields, such as healthcare and marketing. In such scenarios, it is important to estimate the single treatment effects and the interaction treatment effects that arise from treatment combinations. Previous studies have proposed using independent outcome networks with subnetworks for interactions, or combining task embedding networks that capture treatment similarity with variational…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Selecting valid adjustment sets with uncertain causal graphs

因果图不确定时的有效调整集选择

Precise knowledge of causal directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) is assumed for standard approaches towards valid adjustment set selection for unbiased estimation, but in practice, the DAG is often inferred from data or expert knowledge, introducing uncertainty. We present techniques to identify valid adjustment sets despite potential errors in the estimated causal graph. Specifically, we assume that only the skeleton of the DAG is known. Under a Bayesian framework, we place a…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

A tutorial for propensity score weighting methods under violations of the positivity assumption

正值性假设违反时的倾向得分加权方法教程

Violations of the positivity assumption can render conventional causal estimands unidentifiable, including the average treatment effect (ATE), the average treatment effect on the treated (ATT), and the average treatment effect on the controls (ATC). Shifting the inferential focus to their alternative counterparts -- the weighted ATE (WATE), the weighted ATT (WATT), and the weighted ATC (WATC) -- offers valuable insights into treatment effects while preserving internal…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Data reuse enables cost-efficient randomized trials of medical AI models

通过数据复用降低医疗 AI 模型随机试验成本

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are indispensable for establishing the clinical value of medical artificial-intelligence (AI) tools, yet their high cost and long timelines hinder timely validation as new models emerge rapidly. Here, we propose BRIDGE, a data-reuse RCT design for AI-based risk models. AI risk models support a broad range of interventions, including screening, treatment selection, and clinical alerts. BRIDGE trials recycle participant-level data from…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Estimating Total Effects in Bipartite Experiments with Spillovers and Partial Eligibility

存在溢出与部分资格限制的二部实验:总处理效应估计

We study randomized experiments in bipartite systems where only a subset of treatment-side units are eligible for assignment while all units continue to interact, generating interference. We formalize eligibility-constrained bipartite experiments and define estimands aligned with full deployment: the Primary Total Treatment Effect (PTTE) on eligible units and the Secondary Total Treatment Effect (STTE) on ineligible units. Under randomization within the eligible set, we give…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Bayesian Causal Discovery with Cycles and Latent Confounders

允许因果循环与潜在混杂的贝叶斯因果发现

Learning causality from observational data has received increasing interest across various scientific fields. However, most existing methods assume the absence of latent confounders and restrict the underlying causal graph to be acyclic, assumptions that are often violated in many real-world applications. In this paper, we address these challenges by proposing a novel framework for causal discovery that accommodates both cycles and latent confounders. By leveraging the…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Group Identification and Variable Selection in Multivariable Mendelian Randomization with Highly-Correlated Exposures

高度相关暴露下多变量孟德尔随机化的分组识别与变量选择

Multivariable Mendelian Randomization (MVMR) estimates the direct causal effects of multiple risk factors on an outcome using genetic variants as instruments. The growing availability of summary-level genetic data has created opportunities to apply MVMR in high-dimensional settings with many strongly correlated candidate risk factors. However, existing methods face three major limitations: weak instrument bias, limited interpretability, and the absence of valid…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Double machine learning for causal inference in a multivariate sample selection model

多变量样本选择模型中的因果推断与双重机器学习

We propose plug-in (PI) and double machine learning (DML) estimators of average treatment effect (ATE), average treatment effect on the treated (ATET) and local average treatment effect (LATE) in the multivariate sample selection model with ordinal selection equations. Our DML estimators are doubly-robust and based on the efficient influence functions. Finite sample properties of the proposed estimators are studied and compared on simulated data. Specifically, the results of…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Why Do the Elderly Save? Using Health Shocks to Uncover Bequests Motives

老年人为何储蓄?利用健康冲击揭示遗赠动机

We revisit the saving behavior of elderly singles using an adversarial structural estimation framework by Kaji, Manresa and Pouliot (2023). The method bridges the simulated method of moments (SMM) and maximum-likelihood estimation by embedding a flexible discriminator, implemented as a neural network, that adaptively selects the most informative features of the data. Applying this approach to the model of De Nardi, French, and Jones (2010) with AHEAD data, we show that…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Decomposing Inequalities using Machine Learning and Overcoming Common Support Issues

利用机器学习分解不平等并处理共同支撑问题

The Kitagawa-Oaxaca-Blinder decomposition splits the difference in means between two groups into an explained part, due to observable factors, and an unexplained part. In this paper, we reformulate this framework using potential outcomes, highlighting the critical role of the reference outcome. To address limitations like common support and model misspecification, we extend Neumark's (1988) weighted reference approach with a doubly robust estimator. Using Neyman…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Synthetic Survival Control: Extending Synthetic Controls for "When-If" Decision

合成生存控制:面向事件发生时间反事实的合成控制扩展

Estimating causal effects on time-to-event outcomes from observational data is particularly challenging due to censoring, limited sample sizes, and non-random treatment assignment. The need for answering such "when-if" questions--how the timing of an event would change under a specified intervention--commonly arises in real-world settings with heterogeneous treatment adoption and confounding. To address these challenges, we propose Synthetic Survival Control (SSC) to…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Individualized Prediction Bands in Causal Inference with Continuous Treatments

连续处理因果推断中的个体化预测带

Individualized treatments are crucial for optimal decision making and treatment allocation, specifically in personalized medicine based on the estimation of an individual's dose-response curve across a continuum of treatment levels, e.g., drug dosage. Current works focus on conditional mean and median estimates, which are useful but do not provide the full picture. We propose viewing causal inference with a continuous treatment as a covariate shift. This allows us to…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Debiasing hazard-based, time-varying vaccine effects using vaccine-irrelevant infections: An observational extension of a pivotal Phase 3 COVID-19 vaccine efficacy trial

利用疫苗无关感染去偏随时间变化的风险率型疫苗效应

Understanding how vaccine effectiveness (VE) changes over time can provide evidence-based guidance for public health decision making. While commonly reported by practitioners, time-varying VE estimates obtained using Cox regression are vul- nerable to hidden biases. To address these limitations, we describe how to leverage vaccine-irrelevant infections to identify hazard-based, time-varying VE in the pres- ence of unmeasured confounding and selection bias. We articulate…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Causal Inference in Financial Event Studies

金融事件研究中的因果推断

Financial event studies, ubiquitous in finance research, typically use linear factor models with known factors to estimate abnormal returns and identify causal effects of information events. This paper demonstrates that when factor models are misspecified -- an almost certain reality -- traditional event study estimators produce inconsistent estimates of treatment effects. The bias is particularly severe during volatile periods, over long horizons, and when event timing…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

On robust Bayesian causal inference

稳健贝叶斯因果推断

This paper develops a Bayesian framework for robust causal inference from longitudinal observational data. Many contemporary methods rely on structural assumptions, such as factor models, to adjust for unobserved confounding, but they can lead to biased causal estimands when mis-specified. We focus on directly estimating time--unit--specific causal effects and use generalised Bayesian inference to quantify model mis-specification and adjust for it, while retaining…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Causal Inference on Sequential Treatments via Tensor Completion

通过张量补全推断序贯处理的因果效应

Marginal Structural Models (MSMs) are popular for causal inference of sequential treatments in longitudinal observational studies, which however are sensitive to model misspecification. To achieve flexible modeling, we envision the potential outcomes to form a three-dimensional tensor indexed by subject, time, and treatment regime and propose a tensorized history-restricted MSM (HRMSM). The semi-parametric tensor factor model allows us to leverage the underlying low-rank…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Cross-Balancing for Data-Informed Design and Efficient Analysis of Observational Studies

交叉平衡:利用数据设计并高效分析观察研究

Causal inference starts with a simple idea: compare groups that differ by treatment, not much else. Traditionally, similar groups are constructed using only observed covariates; however, it remains a long-standing challenge to incorporate available outcome data into the study design while preserving valid inference. In this paper, we study the general problem of covariate adjustment, effect estimation, and statistical inference when balancing features are constructed or…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Bayesian Semiparametric Causal Inference: Targeted Doubly Robust Estimation of Treatment Effects

贝叶斯半参数因果推断:处理效应的目标化双重稳健估计

We propose a semiparametric Bayesian methodology for estimating the average treatment effect (ATE) within the potential outcomes framework using observational data with high-dimensional nuisance parameters. Our method introduces a Bayesian debiasing procedure that corrects for bias arising from nuisance estimation and employs a targeted modeling strategy based on summary statistics rather than the full data. These summary statistics are identified in a debiased manner,…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

On treating right-censoring events like treatments

将右删失事件视作处理的讨论

In causal inference literature, potential outcomes are often indexed by the "elimination of all right-censoring events," leading to the perception that such a restriction is necessary for defining well-posed causal estimands. In this paper, we clarify that this restriction is not required: a well-defined estimand can be formulated without indexing on the elimination of such events. Achieving this requires a more precise classification of right-censoring events than has…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Iterating marginalized Bayes maps for likelihood maximization with application to nonlinear panel models

迭代边际化贝叶斯映射进行似然最大化及其非线性面板模型应用

Complex dynamic systems can be investigated by fitting mechanistic stochastic dynamic models to time series data. In this context, commonly used Monte Carlo inference procedures for model selection and parameter estimation quickly become computationally unfeasible as the system dimension grows. The increasing prevalence of panel data, characterized by multiple related time series, therefore necessitates the development of inference algorithms that are effective for this…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Why Is the Double-Robust Estimator for Causal Inference Not Doubly Robust for Variance Estimation?

为何因果推断的双重稳健估计量在方差估计上并非双重稳健

Doubly robust estimators (DRE) are widely used in causal inference because they yield consistent estimators of average causal effect when at least one of the nuisance models, the propensity for treatment (exposure) or the outcome regression, is correct. However, double robustness does not extend to variance estimation; the influence-function (IF)-based variance estimator is consistent only when both nuisance parameters are correct. This raises concerns about applying DRE in…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Can we detect treatment effect waning from time-to-event data?

能否从事件时间数据中识别处理效应衰减

Understanding how the causal effect of a treatment evolves over time, including the potential for waning, is important for informed decisions on treatment discontinuation or repetition. For example, waning vaccine protection influences booster dose recommendations, while cost-effectiveness analyses require accounting for long-term efficacy of treatments. However, there is no consensus on the methodology to assess and account for treatment effect waning. Even in randomized…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓