跳到正文
简报说明

来源与收录范围

汇总期刊目录中的 16 个期刊来源,以及 arXiv 计量经济学与相关统计、金融分类和主题检索中的预印本。期刊题录主要来自 Crossref,可靠摘要保留补充来源;期刊官网链接可在论文检索的说明中核对。

保留计量方法研究、相关统计基础及实质涉及计量方法的应用、教程、比较和综述。待核验、范围外及撤回记录不进入公开简报。基础文献按学习与研究需要单独选编。

此前日简报及周、月简报按可核实的原站发表、首次提交和修订日期归档;历史补录只留在文献库。期刊仅纳入收录当月新发表或提前取得题录的论文;只有月份的记录仅进入对应月简报。arXiv 同期只计一次,首次发布优先;未保存的中间版本无法补算。撤回内容会同步移除;所有历史补录仍可在论文检索中查找。

当前结果:已发表 0 篇 · 待刊 0 篇 · 预印本 139 篇

关键词匹配标题、摘要、作者或 DOI;支持部分字母,多词同时匹配,双引号匹配短语。

本期动态按期刊、arXiv 首次发布、arXiv 修订分组,组内默认本文引用优先。也可选择作者引用优先或最新收录。

期刊论文在前,预印本在后。组内先看本文引用,再看已有明确关联作者的最高累计引用,最后按当前日期顺序排序。

“作者引用”指已有明确关联作者的最高累计引用,不合计共同作者。目前作者指标只来自有身份关联快照的预印本,普通期刊条目可能没有该项数据;本页 1/24 篇有可核验作者指标。

本文引用采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计版本;缺失不记作零。累计引用会随时间积累,可结合近年范围比较;引用数和作者发表经历是阅读线索,不代表论文质量或同行评审状态。

“作者发表记录”展示作者已有论文的可核验发表记录,不证明该预印本已接收或通过同行评审。

正常题录、可靠摘要和引用同步继续;AI 解读依据可靠材料,材料不足时保留待解读状态。

Journal of the American Statistical Association 同步延迟 · 上次成功10月15日

本期 139 篇
导出

arXiv · 本期修订

Uniform Inference on High-dimensional Spatial Panel Networks

高维空间面板网络的一致有效推断

We propose employing a high-dimensional generalized method of moments (GMM) estimator, regularized for dimension reduction and subsequently debiased to correct for shrinkage bias (referred to as a debiased-regularized estimator), for inference on large-scale spatial panel networks. In particular, the network structure, which incorporates a flexible sparse deviation that can be regarded either as a latent component or as a misspecification of a predetermined adjacency matrix,…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Target Aggregate Data Adjustment Method for Transportability Analysis Utilizing Summary-Level Data from the Target Population

仅利用目标总体汇总数据的可迁移性分析:目标聚合数据调整法

Transportability analysis is a causal inference framework used to evaluate the external validity of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) or observational studies. Most existing transportability analysis methods require individual patient-level data (IPD) for both the source and the target population, narrowing its applicability when only target aggregate-level data (AgD) is available. Besides, accounting for censoring is essential to reduce bias in longitudinal data, yet…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Convexity Not Required: Estimation of Smooth Moment Condition Models

无需凸性:光滑矩条件模型的估计

Generalized and Simulated Method of Moments are often used to estimate structural Economic models. Yet, it is commonly reported that optimization is challenging because the corresponding objective function is non-convex. For smooth problems, this paper shows that convexity is not required: under conditions involving the Jacobian of the moments, certain algorithms are globally convergent. These include a gradient-descent and a Gauss-Newton algorithm with appropriate choice of…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Better Understanding Triple Differences Estimators

更好地理解三重差分估计量

Triple Differences (DDD) designs are widely used in empirical work to relax parallel trends assumptions in Difference-in-Differences (DiD) settings. This paper highlights that common DDD implementations -- such as taking the difference between two DiDs or applying three-way fixed effects regressions -- are generally invalid when identification requires conditioning on covariates. In staggered adoption settings, the common DiD practice of pooling all not-yet-treated units as…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Deciphering interventional dynamical causality from non-intervention complex systems

从非干预复杂系统中解析干预型动力因果关系

Detecting and quantifying causality is a focal topic in the fields of science, engineering, and interdisciplinary studies. However, causal studies on non-intervention systems attract much attention but remain extremely challenging. Delay-embedding technique provides a promising approach. In this study, we propose a framework named Interventional Dynamical Causality (IntDC) in contrast to the traditional Constructive Dynamical Causality (ConDC). ConDC, including Granger…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Decomposition and Interpretation of Treatment Effects in Settings with Delayed Outcomes

结果延迟实现时治疗效应的分解与解释

This paper studies settings where the analyst is interested in identifying and estimating the average \emph{direct} causal effect of a binary treatment on an outcome. We consider a setup in which the outcome realization does not get immediately realized after the treatment assignment, a feature that is ubiquitous in empirical settings. The period between the treatment and the realization of the outcome allows other observed actions to occur and affect the outcome. In this…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Treatment Effect Heterogeneity in Regression Discontinuity Designs

断点回归设计中的处理效应异质性

Empirical studies using Regression Discontinuity (RD) designs often explore heterogeneous treatment effects based on pretreatment covariates, even though no formal statistical methods exist for such analyses. This has led to the widespread use of ad hoc approaches in applications. Motivated by common empirical practice, we develop a unified, theoretically grounded framework for RD heterogeneity analysis. We show that a fully interacted local linear (in functional parameters)…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Dynamic Spatial Interaction Models for a Resource Allocator's Decisions and Local Agents' Multiple Activities

资源配置者决策与地方主体多项活动的动态空间互动模型

This paper introduces a novel spatial interaction model to explore the decision-making processes of a resource allocator and local agents, with central and local governments serving as empirical representations. The model captures two key features: (i) resource allocations from the allocator to local agents and the resulting strategic interactions, and (ii) local agents' multiple activities and their interactions. We develop a network game for the micro-foundations of these…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

A Binary IV Model for Persuasion: Profiling Persuasion Types among Compliers

说服研究中的二元工具变量模型:刻画服从者的说服类型

In an empirical study of persuasion, researchers often use a binary instrument to encourage individuals to consume information and take some action. We show that, with a binary Imbens-Angrist instrumental variable model and the monotone treatment response assumption, it is possible to identify the joint distribution of potential outcomes among compliers. This is necessary to identify the percentage of mobilised voters and their statistical characteristic defined by the…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Bayesian estimation of causal effects from observational categorical data

基于观测分类数据的因果效应贝叶斯估计

We present a Bayesian procedure for estimation of pairwise intervention effects in a high-dimensional system of categorical variables. We assume that we have observational data generated from an unknown causal Bayesian network for which there are no latent confounders. Most of the existing methods developed for this setting assume that the underlying model is linear Gaussian, including the Bayesian IDA (BIDA) method that we build upon in this work. By combining a Bayesian…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Quantum-enhanced causal discovery for a small number of samples

小样本下的量子增强因果发现

The discovery of causal relations from observed data has attracted significant interest from disciplines such as economics, social sciences, and biology. In practical applications, considerable knowledge of the underlying systems is often unavailable, and real data are usually associated with nonlinear causal structures, which makes the direct use of most conventional causality analysis methods difficult. This study proposes a novel quantum Peter-Clark (qPC) algorithm for…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Generalized coarsened confounding for causal effects: a large-sample framework

因果效应的广义粗化混杂调整:大样本框架

There has been widespread use of causal inference methods for the rigorous analysis of observational studies and to identify policy evaluations. In this article, we consider a class of generalized coarsened procedures for confounding. At a high level, these procedures can be viewed as performing a clustering of confounding variables, followed by treatment effect and attendant variance estimation using the confounder strata. In addition, we propose two new algorithms for…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Causal Inference with Outcomes Truncated by Death and Missing Not at Random

死亡截断与非随机缺失结局下的因果推断

In clinical trials, principal stratification analysis is commonly employed to address the issue of truncation by death, where a subject dies before the outcome can be measured. However, in practice, many survivor outcomes may remain uncollected or be missing not at random, posing a challenge to standard principal stratification analyses. In this paper, we explore the identification, estimation, and bounds of the average treatment effect within a subpopulation of individuals…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Counterfactual Inference under Thompson Sampling

汤普森采样下的反事实推断

Recommender systems exemplify sequential decision-making under uncertainty, strategically deciding what content to serve to users, to optimise a range of potential objectives. To balance the explore-exploit trade-off successfully, Thompson sampling provides a natural and widespread paradigm to probabilistically select which action to take. Questions of causal and counterfactual inference, which underpin use-cases like offline evaluation, are not straightforward to answer in…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Structural Representations and Identification of Marginal Policy Effects

边际政策效应的结构表示与识别

This paper investigates the structural interpretation of the marginal policy effect (MPE) within nonseparable models. We demonstrate that, for a smooth functional of the outcome distribution, the MPE equals its functional derivative evaluated at the outcome-conditioned weighted average structural derivative. This equivalence is definitional rather than identification-based. Building on this theoretical result, we propose an alternative identification strategy for the MPE…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Causal Inference Isn't Special: Why It's Just Another Prediction Problem

因果推断并不特殊:将其理解为预测问题的视角

Causal inference is often portrayed as fundamentally distinct from predictive modeling, with its own terminology, goals, and intellectual challenges. But at its core, causal inference is simply a structured instance of prediction under distribution shift. In both cases, we begin with labeled data from a source domain and seek to generalize to a target domain where outcomes are not observed. The key difference is that in causal inference, the labels -- potential outcomes --…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Heavy-tailed max-linear structural equation models in networks with hidden nodes

含隐藏节点网络中的重尾最大线性结构方程模型

Recursive max-linear vectors provide models for causal dependence between large values of random variables that are supported on directed acyclic graphs, but the standard assumption that all nodes of such a graph are observed can be unrealistic. We give necessary and sufficient conditions for a partially observed recursive max-linear vector to be representable as a recursive max-linear (sub-)model and provide a graphical algorithm to construct the latter. Our conditions…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Unconditional Randomization Tests for Interference

检验单位间干扰的无条件随机化检验

Researchers are often interested in the existence and extent of interference between units when conducting causal inference or designing policy. However, testing for interference presents significant econometric challenges, particularly due to complex clustering patterns and dependencies that can invalidate standard methods. This paper introduces the pairwise imputation-based randomization test (PIRT), a general and robust framework for assessing the existence and extent of…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

High Dimensional Binary Choice Model with Unknown Heteroskedasticity or Instrumental Variables

允许未知异方差或工具变量的高维二元选择模型

This paper proposes a new method for estimating high-dimensional binary choice models. We consider a semiparametric model that places no distributional assumptions on the error term, allows for heteroskedastic errors, and permits endogenous regressors. Our approaches extend the special regressor estimator originally proposed by Lewbel (2000). This estimator becomes impractical in high-dimensional settings due to the curse of dimensionality associated with high-dimensional…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Doubly Robust Uniform Confidence Bands for Group-Time Conditional Average Treatment Effects in Difference-in-Differences

双重差分中组别—时期条件平均处理效应的双重稳健一致置信带

We consider a panel data analysis to examine the heterogeneity in treatment effects with respect to groups, periods, and a pre-treatment covariate of interest in the staggered difference-in-differences setting of Callaway and Sant'Anna (2021). Under standard identification conditions, a doubly robust estimand conditional on the covariate identifies the group-time conditional average treatment effect given the covariate. Focusing on the case of a continuous covariate, we…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Interpretational challenges of the Win Ratio in analyzing Hierarchical Composite Endpoints in Chronic Kidney Disease

慢性肾病分层复合终点分析中胜率比的解释难题

Win statistics based methods have gained traction as a method for analyzing Hierarchical Composite Endpoints (HCEs) in randomized clinical trials, particularly in cardiovascular and kidney disease research. HCEs offer several key advantages, including increased statistical power, mitigation of competing risks, and hierarchical ranking of clinical outcomes. While, as summary measures, the win ratio (WR) along with the Net Benefit (NB) and the Win Odds (WO) provide a…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Policy Learning with New Treatments

包含新处理选项的政策学习

I study the problem of a decision maker choosing a policy which allocates treatment to a heterogeneous population on the basis of experimental data that includes only a subset of possible treatment values. The effects of new treatments are partially identified by shape restrictions on treatment response. Policies are compared according to the minimax regret criterion, and I show that the empirical analog of the population decision problem has a tractable linear- and…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Just Trial Once: Ongoing Causal Validation of Machine Learning Models

只试验一次:机器学习模型更新的持续因果验证

Machine learning (ML) models are increasingly used as decision-support tools in high-risk domains. Evaluating the causal impact of deploying such models can be done with a randomized controlled trial (RCT) that randomizes users to ML vs. control groups and assesses the effect on relevant outcomes. However, ML models are inevitably updated over time, and we often lack evidence for the causal impact of these updates. While the causal effect could be repeatedly validated with…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Formalising causal inference as prediction on a target population

将因果推断形式化为目标总体上的预测

The standard approach to causal modelling especially in social and health sciences is the potential outcomes framework due to Neyman and Rubin. In this framework, observations are thought to be drawn from a distribution over variables of interest, and the goal is to identify parameters of this distribution. Even though the stated goal is often to inform decision making on some target population, there is no straightforward way to include these target populations in the…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓