跳到正文
简报说明

来源与收录范围

汇总期刊目录中的 16 个期刊来源,以及 arXiv 计量经济学与相关统计、金融分类和主题检索中的预印本。期刊题录主要来自 Crossref,可靠摘要保留补充来源;期刊官网链接可在论文检索的说明中核对。

保留计量方法研究、相关统计基础及实质涉及计量方法的应用、教程、比较和综述。待核验、范围外及撤回记录不进入公开简报。基础文献按学习与研究需要单独选编。

此前日简报及周、月简报按可核实的原站发表、首次提交和修订日期归档;历史补录只留在文献库。期刊仅纳入收录当月新发表或提前取得题录的论文;只有月份的记录仅进入对应月简报。arXiv 同期只计一次,首次发布优先;未保存的中间版本无法补算。撤回内容会同步移除;所有历史补录仍可在论文检索中查找。

当前结果:已发表 0 篇 · 待刊 0 篇 · 预印本 174 篇

关键词匹配标题、摘要、作者或 DOI;支持部分字母,多词同时匹配,双引号匹配短语。

本期动态按期刊、arXiv 首次发布、arXiv 修订分组,组内默认本文引用优先。也可选择作者引用优先或最新收录。

期刊论文在前,预印本在后。组内先看本文引用,再看已有明确关联作者的最高累计引用,最后按当前日期顺序排序。

“作者引用”指已有明确关联作者的最高累计引用,不合计共同作者。目前作者指标只来自有身份关联快照的预印本,普通期刊条目可能没有该项数据;本页 0/24 篇有可核验作者指标。

本文引用采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计版本;缺失不记作零。累计引用会随时间积累,可结合近年范围比较;引用数和作者发表经历是阅读线索,不代表论文质量或同行评审状态。

“作者发表记录”展示作者已有论文的可核验发表记录,不证明该预印本已接收或通过同行评审。

正常题录、可靠摘要和引用同步继续;AI 解读依据可靠材料,材料不足时保留待解读状态。

本期 174 篇
导出

arXiv · 本期修订

Recover Experimental Data with Selection Bias using Counterfactual Logic

用反事实逻辑恢复存在选择偏差的实验数据

Selection bias, arising from the systematic inclusion or exclusion of certain samples, poses a significant challenge to the validity of causal inference. While Bareinboim et al. introduced methods for recovering unbiased observational and interventional distributions from biased data using partial external information, the complexity of the backdoor adjustment and the method's strong reliance on observational data limit its applicability in many practical settings. In this…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Isolated Causal Effects of Natural Language

自然语言的孤立因果效应

As language technologies become widespread, it is important to understand how changes in language affect reader perceptions and behaviors. These relationships may be formalized as the isolated causal effect of some focal language-encoded intervention (e.g., factual inaccuracies) on an external outcome (e.g., readers' beliefs). In this paper, we introduce a formal estimation framework for isolated causal effects of language. We show that a core challenge of estimating…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Proximal indirect comparison

近端间接比较

We consider the problem of indirect comparison, where a treatment arm of interest is absent by design in one randomized controlled trial but available in the other. The former is the target trial, and the latter is the source trial. The identifiability of the target population average treatment effect often relies on conditional transportability assumptions. However, it is a common concern whether all relevant effect modifiers are measured and controlled for. We give a new…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Using Forests in Multivariate Regression Discontinuity Designs

多评分断点回归设计中的森林方法

We discuss estimation and inference of conditional treatment effects in regression discontinuity (RD) designs with multiple scores. In addition to local linear regressions and the minimax-optimal estimator more recently proposed by Imbens and Wager (2019), we argue that two variants of random forests, honest regression forests and local linear forests, should be added to the toolkit of applied researchers working with multivariate RD designs; their validity follows from…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Forests for Differences: Robust Causal Inference Beyond Parametric DiD

用于双重差分的森林:超越参数模型的因果推断

This paper introduces the Difference-in-Differences Bayesian Causal Forest (DiD-BCF), a novel non-parametric model addressing key challenges in DiD estimation, such as staggered adoption and heterogeneous treatment effects. DiD-BCF provides a unified framework for estimating Average (ATE), Group-Average (GATE), and Conditional Average Treatment Effects (CATE). A core innovation, its Parallel Trends Assumption (PTA)-based reparameterization, enhances estimation accuracy and…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

A Randomization-Based Method for Evaluating Time-Varying Treatment Effects

评价时变处理效应的随机化方法

Tests for paired censored outcomes have been extensively studied, with some justified in the context of randomization-based inference. These tests are primarily designed to detect an overall treatment effect across the entire follow-up period, providing limited insight into when the effect manifests and how it changes over time. In this article, we introduce new randomization-based tests for paired censored outcomes that enable both time-specific and long-term analysis of a…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Distinguishing Cause from Effect with Causal Velocity Models

利用因果速度模型区分原因与结果

Bivariate structural causal models (SCM) are often used to infer causal direction by examining their goodness-of-fit under restricted model classes. In this paper, we describe a parametrization of bivariate SCMs in terms of a causal velocity by viewing the cause variable as time in a dynamical system. The velocity implicitly defines counterfactual curves via the solution of initial value problems where the observation specifies the initial condition. Using tools from measure…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Efficiency of QMLE for dynamic panel data models with interactive effects

含交互效应动态面板模型的准极大似然估计效率

This paper studies the problem of efficient estimation of panel data models in the presence of an increasing number of incidental parameters. We formulate the dynamic panel as a simultaneous equations system, and derive the efficiency bound under the normality assumption. We then show that the Gaussian quasi-maximum likelihood estimator (QMLE) applied to the system achieves the normality efficiency bound without the normality assumption. Comparison of QMLE with the fixed…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Conditional Triple Difference-in-Differences

条件三重差分法

Triple difference-in-differences designs are widely used to estimate causal effects in empirical work. Surveying the literature, we find that most applications include controls. We show that this standard practice is generally biased for the target causal estimand when covariate distributions differ across groups. To address this, we propose identifying a causal estimand by fixing the covariate distribution to that of one group. We then develop a double-robust estimator and…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Are you doing better than random guessing? A call for using negative controls when evaluating causal discovery algorithms

因果发现优于随机猜测吗?评估算法时使用负对照

New proposals for causal discovery algorithms are typically evaluated using simulations and a few selected real data examples with known data generating mechanisms. However, there does not exist a general guideline for how such evaluation studies should be designed, and therefore, comparing results across different studies can be difficult. In this article, we propose to use negative controls as a common evaluation baseline by posing the question: Are we doing better than…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Testing Generalizability in Causal Inference

因果推断中的泛化能力检验

Ensuring robust model performance in diverse real-world scenarios requires addressing generalizability across domains with covariate shifts. However, no formal procedure exists for statistically evaluating generalizability in machine learning algorithms. Existing predictive metrics like mean squared error (MSE) help to quantify the relative performance between models, but do not directly answer whether a model can or cannot generalize. To address this gap in the domain of…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

CATE Estimation With Potential Outcome Imputation From Local Regression

基于局部回归潜在结果插补的条件平均处理效应估计

One of the most significant challenges in Conditional Average Treatment Effect (CATE) estimation is the statistical discrepancy between distinct treatment groups. To address this issue, we propose a model-agnostic data augmentation method for CATE estimation. First, we derive regret bounds for general data augmentation methods suggesting that a small imputation error may be necessary for accurate CATE estimation. Inspired by this idea, we propose a contrastive learning…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Generalized Random Forests using Fixed-Point Trees

使用不动点树的广义随机森林

We propose a computationally efficient alternative to generalized random forests (GRFs) for estimating heterogeneous effects in large dimensions. While GRFs rely on a gradient-based splitting criterion, which in large dimensions is computationally expensive and unstable, our method introduces a fixed-point approximation that eliminates the need for Jacobian estimation. This gradient-free approach preserves GRF's theoretical guarantees of consistency and asymptotic normality…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Identification of dynamic treatment effects when treatment histories are partially observed

处理历史部分可观测时动态处理效应的识别

This paper presents a general difference-in-differences framework for identifying path-dependent treatment effects when treatment histories are partially observed. We introduce a novel robust estimator that adjusts for missing histories using a combination of outcome, propensity score, and missing treatment models. We show that this approach identifies the target parameter as long as \textit{any two} of the three models are correctly specified. The method delivers improved…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Quantile Treatment Effects in High Dimensional Panel Data

高维面板数据中的分位数处理效应

We introduce novel estimators for quantile causal effects with high dimensional panel data (large $N$ and $T$), where only one or a few units are affected by the intervention or policy. Our method extends the generalized synthetic control method \citep{xu_2017} from average treatment effects on the treated to quantile treatment effects on the treated, allowing the underlying factor structure to change across the quantile of the interested outcome distribution. Our method…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Fast computation of exact confidence intervals for randomized experiments with binary outcomes

二元结果随机实验精确置信区间的快速计算

Given a randomized experiment with binary outcomes, exact confidence intervals for the average causal effect of the treatment can be computed through a series of permutation tests. This approach requires minimal assumptions and is valid for all sample sizes, as it does not rely on large-sample approximations such as those implied by the central limit theorem. We show that these confidence intervals can be found in $O(n \log n)$ permutation tests in the case of balanced…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Heterogeneity, Uncertainty and Learning: Semiparametric Identification and Estimation

异质性、不确定性与学习:半参数识别和估计

We provide identification results for a broad class of learning models in which continuous outcomes depend on three types of unobservables: known heterogeneity, initially unknown heterogeneity that may be revealed over time, and transitory uncertainty. We consider a common environment where the researcher only has access to a short panel on choices and realized outcomes. We establish identification of the outcome equation parameters and the distribution of the unobservables,…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Estimating Complier Average Causal Effects with Mixtures of Experts

利用专家混合模型估计依从者平均因果效应

Treatment non-compliance, where individuals deviate from their assigned experimental conditions, frequently complicates the estimation of causal effects. To address this, we introduce a novel learning framework based on a mixture of experts architecture to estimate the Complier Average Causal Effect (CACE). Our framework provides a flexible alternative to classical instrumental variable methods by relaxing their strict monotonicity and exclusion restriction assumptions. We…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Randomization Inference of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects under Network Interference

网络干扰下异质处理效应的随机化推断

We develop randomization-based tests for heterogeneous treatment effects in the presence of network interference. Leveraging the exposure mapping framework, we study a broad class of null hypotheses that represent various forms of constant treatment effects in networked populations. These null hypotheses, unlike the classical Fisher sharp null, are not sharp due to unknown parameters and multiple potential outcomes. Existing conditional randomization procedures either fail…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Flexible and Efficient Estimation of Causal Effects with Error-Prone Exposures: A Control Variates Approach for Measurement Error

含暴露测量误差的灵活高效因果效应估计:控制变量法

Exposure measurement error is a ubiquitous but often overlooked challenge in causal inference with observational data. Existing methods accounting for exposure measurement error largely rely on restrictive parametric assumptions, while emerging data-adaptive estimation approaches allow for less restrictive assumptions but at the cost of flexibility, as they are typically tailored towards rigidly-defined statistical quantities. There remains a critical need for…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Learning treatment effects while treating those in need

在帮助有需要者的同时学习处理效应

Many social programs attempt to allocate scarce resources to people with the greatest need. Indeed, public services increasingly use algorithmic risk assessments motivated by this goal. However, targeting the highest-need recipients often conflicts with attempting to evaluate the causal effect of the program as a whole, as the best evaluations would be obtained by randomizing the allocation. We propose a framework to design randomized allocation rules which optimally balance…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

A General Framework on Conditions for Constraint-based Causal Learning

基于约束的因果学习:正确性条件的一般框架

Most constraint-based causal learning algorithms provably return the correct causal graph under certain correctness conditions, such as faithfulness. By representing any constraint-based causal learning algorithm using the notion of a property, we provide a general framework to obtain and study correctness conditions for these algorithms. From the framework, we provide exact correctness conditions for the PC algorithm, which are then related to the correctness conditions of…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Bayesian regression discontinuity design with unknown cutoff

阈值未知时的贝叶斯断点回归设计

The regression discontinuity design (RDD) is a quasi-experimental approach used to estimate the causal effects of an intervention assigned based on a cutoff criterion. RDD exploits the idea that close to the cutoff units below and above are similar; hence, they can be meaningfully compared. Consequently, the causal effect can be estimated only locally at the cutoff point. This makes the cutoff point an essential element of RDD. However, the exact cutoff location may not…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Kernel-based estimators for functional causal effects

函数型因果效应的核估计方法

We propose causal effect estimators based on empirical Fréchet means and operator-valued kernels, tailored to functional data spaces. These methods address the challenges of high-dimensionality, sequential ordering, and model complexity while preserving robustness to treatment misspecification. Using structural assumptions, we obtain compact representations of potential outcomes, enabling scalable estimation of causal effects over time and across covariates. We provide both…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓