跳到正文
简报说明

来源与收录范围

汇总期刊目录中的 16 个期刊来源,以及 arXiv 计量经济学与相关统计、金融分类和主题检索中的预印本。期刊题录主要来自 Crossref,可靠摘要保留补充来源;期刊官网链接可在论文检索的说明中核对。

保留计量方法研究、相关统计基础及实质涉及计量方法的应用、教程、比较和综述。待核验、范围外及撤回记录不进入公开简报。基础文献按学习与研究需要单独选编。

此前日简报及周、月简报按可核实的原站发表、首次提交和修订日期归档;历史补录只留在文献库。期刊仅纳入收录当月新发表或提前取得题录的论文;只有月份的记录仅进入对应月简报。arXiv 同期只计一次,首次发布优先;未保存的中间版本无法补算。撤回内容会同步移除;所有历史补录仍可在论文检索中查找。

当前结果:已发表 0 篇 · 待刊 0 篇 · 预印本 147 篇

关键词匹配标题、摘要、作者或 DOI;支持部分字母,多词同时匹配,双引号匹配短语。

本期动态按期刊、arXiv 首次发布、arXiv 修订分组,组内默认本文引用优先。也可选择作者引用优先或最新收录。

期刊论文在前,预印本在后。组内先看本文引用,再看已有明确关联作者的最高累计引用,最后按当前日期顺序排序。

“作者引用”指已有明确关联作者的最高累计引用,不合计共同作者。目前作者指标只来自有身份关联快照的预印本,普通期刊条目可能没有该项数据;本页 0/24 篇有可核验作者指标。

本文引用采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计版本;缺失不记作零。累计引用会随时间积累,可结合近年范围比较;引用数和作者发表经历是阅读线索,不代表论文质量或同行评审状态。

“作者发表记录”展示作者已有论文的可核验发表记录,不证明该预印本已接收或通过同行评审。

正常题录、可靠摘要和引用同步继续;AI 解读依据可靠材料,材料不足时保留待解读状态。

2 个来源同步延迟

本期 147 篇
导出

arXiv · 本期修订

A Computational Theory for Efficient Mini Agent Evaluation with Causal Guarantees

具有因果保证的高效小型智能体评估计算理论

In order to reduce the cost of experimental evaluation for agents, we introduce a computational theory of evaluation for mini agents: build evaluation model to accelerate the evaluation procedures. We prove upper bounds of generalized error and generalized causal effect error of given evaluation models for infinite agents. We also prove efficiency, and consistency to estimated causal effect from deployed agents to evaluation metric by prediction. To learn evaluation models,…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Optimization-based Sensitivity Analysis for Unmeasured Confounding using Partial Correlations

利用偏相关的未观测混杂优化敏感性分析

Causal inference necessarily relies upon untestable assumptions; hence, it is crucial to assess the robustness of obtained results to violations of identification assumptions. However, such sensitivity analysis is only occasionally undertaken in practice, as many existing methods require analytically tractable solutions and their results are often difficult to interpret. We take a more flexible approach to sensitivity analysis and view it as a constrained stochastic…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Modeling and Discovering Direct Causes for Predictive Models

预测模型直接原因的建模与发现

We introduce a causal modeling framework that captures the input-output behavior of predictive models (e.g., machine learning models). The framework enables us to identify features that directly cause the predictions, which has broad implications for data collection and model evaluation. We then present sound and complete algorithms for discovering direct causes (from data) under some assumptions. Furthermore, we propose a novel independence rule that can be integrated with…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Causal Effect of Functional Treatment

函数型处理的因果效应

We study the causal effect with a functional treatment variable, where practical applications often arise in neuroscience, biomedical sciences, etc. Previous research concerning the effect of a functional variable on an outcome is typically restricted to exploring correlation rather than causality. The generalized propensity score, which is often used to calibrate the selection bias, is not directly applicable to a functional treatment variable due to a lack of definition of…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Not all distributional shifts are equal: Fine-grained robust conformal inference

并非所有分布漂移都相同:细粒度稳健共形推断

We introduce a fine-grained framework for uncertainty quantification of predictive models under distributional shifts. This framework distinguishes the shift in covariate distributions from that in the conditional relationship between the outcome ($Y$) and the covariates ($X$). We propose to reweight the training samples to adjust for an identifiable covariate shift while protecting against worst-case conditional distribution shift bounded in an $f$-divergence ball. Based on…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Calibration Strategies for Robust Causal Estimation: Theoretical and Empirical Insights on Propensity Score-Based Estimators

稳健因果估计的校准策略:倾向得分估计量的理论与实证分析

The partitioning of data for estimation and calibration critically impacts the performance of propensity score based estimators like inverse probability weighting (IPW) and double/debiased machine learning (DML) frameworks. We extend recent advances in calibration techniques for propensity score estimation, improving the robustness of propensity scores in challenging settings such as limited overlap, small sample sizes, or unbalanced data. Our contributions are twofold:…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Quasi-Bayesian Estimation and Inference with Control Functions

使用控制函数的准贝叶斯估计与推断

This paper introduces a quasi-Bayesian method that integrates frequentist nonparametric estimation with Bayesian inference in a two-stage process. Applied to an endogenous discrete choice model, the approach first uses kernel or sieve estimators to estimate the control function nonparametrically, followed by Bayesian methods to estimate the structural parameters. This combination leverages the advantages of both frequentist tractability for nonparametric estimation and…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Towards identifiability of micro total effects in summary causal graphs with latent confounding: extension of the front-door criterion

含潜在混杂的汇总因果图中微观总效应的可识别性:前门准则扩展

Conducting experiments to estimate total effects can be challenging due to cost, ethical concerns, or practical limitations. As an alternative, researchers often rely on causal graphs to determine whether these effects can be identified from observational data. Identifying total effects in fully specified causal graphs has received considerable attention, with Pearl's front-door criterion enabling the identification of total effects in the presence of latent confounding even…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Policy Learning for Optimal Dynamic Treatment Regimes with Observational Data

利用观察数据学习最优动态处理规则

Public policies and medical interventions often involve dynamic treatment assignments, in which individuals receive a sequence of interventions over multiple stages. We study the statistical learning of optimal dynamic treatment regimes (DTRs) that determine the optimal treatment assignment for each individual at each stage based on their evolving history. We propose a novel, doubly robust, classification-based method for learning the optimal DTR from observational data…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Distributional Difference-in-Differences Models with Multiple Time Periods

多时期分布型双重差分模型

Researchers are often interested in evaluating the impact of a policy on the entire (or specific parts of the) distribution of the outcome of interest. In this paper, I provide a method to recover the whole distribution of the untreated potential outcome for the treated group in non-experimental settings with staggered treatment adoption by generalizing the existing quantile treatment effects on the treated (QTT) estimator proposed by Callaway and Li (2019). Besides the QTT,…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

A comparison of methods for estimating the average treatment effect on the treated for externally controlled trials

外部对照试验中处理组平均处理效应估计方法的比较

While randomized trials may be the gold standard for evaluating the effectiveness of the treatment intervention, in some special circumstances, single-arm clinical trials utilizing external control may be considered. The causal treatment effect of interest for single-arm trials is usually the average treatment effect on the treated (ATT) rather than the average treatment effect (ATE). Although methods have been developed to estimate the ATT, the selection and use of these…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Design-Based Causal Inference with Missing Outcomes: Missingness Mechanisms, Imputation-Assisted Randomization Tests, and Covariate Adjustment

结果缺失下的设计型因果推断:缺失机制、插补随机化检验与协变量调整

Design-based causal inference, also known as randomization-based or finite-population causal inference, is one of the most widely used causal inference frameworks, largely due to the merit that its validity can be guaranteed by study design (e.g., randomized experiments) and does not require assuming specific outcome-generating distributions or super-population models. Despite its advantages, design-based causal inference can still suffer from other issues, among which…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Fast Rerandomization via the BRAIN

通过 BRAIN 实现快速再随机化

Randomized experiments are a crucial tool for causal inference in many different fields. Rerandomization addresses any covariate imbalance in such experiments by resampling treatment assignments until certain balance criteria are satisfied. However, rerandomization based on naïve acceptance-rejection sampling is computationally inefficient, especially when numerous independent assignments are required to perform randomization-based statistical inference. Existing…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Using Time Structure to Estimate Causal Effects

利用时间结构估计因果效应

There exist several approaches for estimating causal effects in time series when latent confounding is present. Many of these approaches rely on additional auxiliary observed variables or time series such as instruments, negative controls or time series that satisfy the front- or backdoor criterion in certain graphs. In this paper, we present a novel approach for estimating direct (and via Wright's path rule total) causal effects in a time series setup which does not rely on…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Inference for the proportional odds cumulative logit model with monotonicity constraints for ordinal predictors and ordinal response

有序预测变量单调性约束下的比例优势累积 logit 模型推断

The proportional odds cumulative logit model (POCLM) is a standard regression model for an ordinal response. Ordinality of predictors can be incorporated by monotonicity constraints for the corresponding parameters. It is shown that estimators defined by optimization, such as maximum likelihood estimators, for an unconstrained model and for parameters in the interior set of the parameter space of a constrained model are asymptotically equivalent. This is used in order to…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Improving Causal Inference with Measurement Errors in Exposures and Confounders: A New Method and Its Application to Air Pollution Exposure Assessment and Epidemiology

暴露与混杂变量测量误差下的因果推断:方法及空气污染应用

When exposure measurement error (EME), confounder measurement error (CME), or both are present, health effect estimates regarding exposure mixtures and critical exposure time-window may not represent the true effects. For example, in air pollution epidemiology, modeled estimates for multiple air pollutants and meteorological factors may serve as surrogates for exposures and confounders. Methods for simultaneously addressing EME and CME remain understudied. We developed a…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Improving precision of A/B experiments using trigger intensity

利用触发强度提高 A/B 实验精度

In industry, online randomized controlled experiment (a.k.a. A/B experiment) is a standard approach to measure the impact of a causal change. These experiments have small treatment effect to reduce the potential blast radius. As a result, these experiments often lack statistical significance due to low signal-to-noise ratio. A standard approach for improving the precision (or reducing the standard error) focuses only on the trigger observations, where the output of the…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Improving the Variance of Differentially Private Randomized Experiments through Clustering

通过聚类改善差分隐私随机实验的方差

Estimating causal effects from randomized experiments is only possible if participants are willing to disclose their potentially sensitive responses. Differential privacy, a widely used framework for ensuring an algorithms privacy guarantees, can encourage participants to share their responses without the risk of de-anonymization. However, many mechanisms achieve differential privacy by adding noise to the original dataset, which reduces the precision of causal effect…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

PUATE: Efficient Average Treatment Effect Estimation from Treated (Positive) and Unlabeled Units

PUATE:处理组与未标记个体的高效平均处理效应估计

The estimation of average treatment effects (ATEs), defined as the difference in expected outcomes between treatment and control groups, is a central topic in causal inference. This study develops semiparametric efficient estimators for ATE in a setting where only a treatment group and an unlabeled group, consisting of units whose treatment status is unknown, are observed. This scenario constitutes a variant of learning from positive and unlabeled data (PU learning) and can…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Regularizing Fairness in Optimal Policy Learning with Distributional Targets

具有分布目标的最优政策学习中的公平性正则化

A decision maker typically (i) incorporates training data to learn about the relative effectiveness of treatments, and (ii) chooses an implementation mechanism that implies an ``optimal'' predicted outcome distribution according to some target functional. Nevertheless, a fairness-aware decision maker may not be satisfied achieving said optimality at the cost of being ``unfair" against a subgroup of the population, in the sense that the outcome distribution in that subgroup…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Improve the Precision of Area Under the Curve Estimation for Recurrent Events Through Covariate Adjustment

通过协变量调整提高复发事件曲线下面积估计精度

The area under the curve (AUC) of the mean cumulative function (MCF) has recently been introduced as a novel estimand for evaluating treatment effects in recurrent event settings, offering an alternative to the commonly used Lin-Wei-Yang-Ying (LWYY) model. The AUC of the MCF provides a clinically interpretable summary measure that captures the overall burden of disease progression, regardless of whether the proportionality assumption holds. To improve the precision of the…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Tightening Causal Bounds via Covariate-Aware Optimal Transport

通过纳入协变量的最优传输收紧因果效应界

Causal estimands can vary significantly depending on the relationship between outcomes in treatment and control groups, potentially leading to wide partial identification (PI) intervals that impede decision making. Incorporating covariates can substantially tighten these bounds, but requires determining the range of PI over probability models consistent with the joint distributions of observed covariates and outcomes in treatment and control groups. This problem is known to…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Reinforcement Learning for Causal Discovery without Acyclicity Constraints

无需显式无环约束的强化学习因果发现

Recently, reinforcement learning (RL) has proved a promising alternative for conventional local heuristics in score-based approaches to learning directed acyclic causal graphs (DAGs) from observational data. However, the intricate acyclicity constraint still challenges the efficient exploration of the vast space of DAGs in existing methods. In this study, we introduce ALIAS (reinforced dAg Learning wIthout Acyclicity conStraints), a novel approach to causal discovery powered…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Propensity weighting plus adjustment in proportional hazards model is not doubly robust

比例风险模型中的倾向加权加回归调整不具一般双重稳健性

Recently, it has become common for applied works to combine commonly used survival analysis modeling methods, such as the multivariable Cox model and propensity score weighting, with the intention of forming a doubly robust estimator of an exposure effect hazard ratio that is unbiased in large samples when either the Cox model or the propensity score model is correctly specified. This combination does not, in general, produce a doubly robust estimator, even after regression…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓