跳到正文
简报说明

来源与收录范围

汇总期刊目录中的 16 个期刊来源,以及 arXiv 计量经济学与相关统计、金融分类和主题检索中的预印本。期刊题录主要来自 Crossref,可靠摘要保留补充来源;期刊官网链接可在论文检索的说明中核对。

保留计量方法研究、相关统计基础及实质涉及计量方法的应用、教程、比较和综述。待核验、范围外及撤回记录不进入公开简报。基础文献按学习与研究需要单独选编。

此前日简报及周、月简报按可核实的原站发表、首次提交和修订日期归档;历史补录只留在文献库。期刊仅纳入收录当月新发表或提前取得题录的论文;只有月份的记录仅进入对应月简报。arXiv 同期只计一次,首次发布优先;未保存的中间版本无法补算。撤回内容会同步移除;所有历史补录仍可在论文检索中查找。

当前结果:已发表 0 篇 · 待刊 0 篇 · 预印本 121 篇

关键词匹配标题、摘要、作者或 DOI;支持部分字母,多词同时匹配,双引号匹配短语。

本期动态按期刊、arXiv 首次发布、arXiv 修订分组,组内默认本文引用优先。也可选择作者引用优先或最新收录。

期刊论文在前,预印本在后。组内先看本文引用,再看已有明确关联作者的最高累计引用,最后按当前日期顺序排序。

“作者引用”指已有明确关联作者的最高累计引用,不合计共同作者。目前作者指标只来自有身份关联快照的预印本,普通期刊条目可能没有该项数据;本页 0/24 篇有可核验作者指标。

本文引用采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计版本;缺失不记作零。累计引用会随时间积累,可结合近年范围比较;引用数和作者发表经历是阅读线索,不代表论文质量或同行评审状态。

“作者发表记录”展示作者已有论文的可核验发表记录,不证明该预印本已接收或通过同行评审。

正常题录、可靠摘要和引用同步继续;AI 解读依据可靠材料,材料不足时保留待解读状态。

本期 121 篇
导出

arXiv · 本期修订

Interventional Causal Discovery in a Mixture of DAGs

混合有向无环图中的干预式因果发现

Causal interactions among a group of variables are often modeled by a single causal graph. In some domains, however, these interactions are best described by multiple co-existing causal graphs, e.g., in dynamical systems or genomics. This paper addresses the hitherto unknown role of interventions in learning causal interactions among variables governed by a mixture of causal systems, each modeled by one directed acyclic graph (DAG). Causal discovery from mixtures is…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

SpaCE: The Spatial Confounding Environment

SpaCE:空间混杂评测环境

Spatial confounding poses a significant challenge in scientific studies involving spatial data, where unobserved spatial variables can influence both treatment and outcome, possibly leading to spurious associations. To address this problem, we introduce SpaCE: The Spatial Confounding Environment, the first toolkit to provide realistic benchmark datasets and tools for systematically evaluating causal inference methods designed to alleviate spatial confounding. Each dataset…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Controlling Counterfactual Harm in Decision Support Systems Based on Prediction Sets

控制基于预测集的决策支持系统中的反事实伤害

Decision support systems based on prediction sets help humans solve multiclass classification tasks by narrowing down the set of potential label values to a subset of them, namely a prediction set, and asking them to always predict label values from the prediction sets. While this type of systems have been proven to be effective at improving the average accuracy of the predictions made by humans, by restricting human agency, they may cause harm$\unicode{x2014}$a human who…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Marginal Causal Flows for Validation and Inference

用于验证与推断的边际因果流模型

Investigating the marginal causal effect of an intervention on an outcome from complex data remains challenging due to the inflexibility of employed models and the lack of complexity in causal benchmark datasets, which often fail to reproduce intricate real-world data patterns. In this paper we introduce Frugal Flows, a novel likelihood-based machine learning model that uses normalising flows to flexibly learn the data-generating process, while also directly inferring the…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Comparative Study of Causal Discovery Methods for Cyclic Models with Hidden Confounders

含隐蔽混杂的循环模型因果发现方法比较

Nowadays, the need for causal discovery is ubiquitous. A better understanding of not just the stochastic dependencies between parts of a system, but also the actual cause-effect relations, is essential for all parts of science. Thus, the need for reliable methods to detect causal directions is growing constantly. In the last 50 years, many causal discovery algorithms have emerged, but most of them are applicable only under the assumption that the systems have no feedback…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Auditing Fairness under Unobserved Confounding

未观测混杂下的公平性审计

Many definitions of fairness or inequity involve unobservable causal quantities that cannot be directly estimated without strong assumptions. For instance, it is particularly difficult to estimate notions of fairness that rely on hard-to-measure concepts such as risk (e.g., quantifying whether patients at the same risk level have equal probability of treatment, regardless of group membership). Such measurements of risk can be accurately obtained when no unobserved…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Improve Sensitivity Analysis Synthesizing Randomized Clinical Trials With Limited Overlap

利用有限重叠的随机临床试验改进敏感性分析

Randomized clinical trials are the gold standard when estimating the average treatment effect. However, they are usually not a random sample from the real-world population because of the inclusion/exclusion rules. Meanwhile, observational studies typically consist of representative samples from the real-world population. However, due to unmeasured confounding, sensitivity analysis is often used to estimate bounds for the average treatment effect without relying on stringent…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Weighted Q-learning for optimal dynamic treatment regimes with nonignorable missing covariates

非可忽略协变量缺失下优化动态治疗方案的加权 Q-learning

Dynamic treatment regimes (DTRs) formalize medical decision-making as a sequence of rules for different stages, mapping patient-level information to recommended treatments. In practice, estimating an optimal DTR using observational data from electronic medical record (EMR) databases can be complicated by nonignorable missing covariates resulting from informative monitoring of patients. Since complete case analysis can provide consistent estimation of outcome model parameters…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Data-Adaptive Identification of Effect Modifiers through Stochastic Shift Interventions and Cross-Validated Targeted Learning

通过随机位移干预与交叉验证靶向学习自适应识别效应修饰因素

In epidemiology, identifying subpopulations that are particularly vulnerable to exposures and those who may benefit differently from exposure-reducing interventions is essential. Factors such as age, gender-specific vulnerabilities, and physiological states such as pregnancy are critical for policymakers when setting regulatory guidelines. However, current semi-parametric methods for estimating heterogeneous treatment effects are often limited to binary exposures and can…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Interacting Treatments with Endogenous Takeup

内生接受情形下的处理交互作用

We study causal inference in randomized experiments (or quasi-experiments) following a $2\times 2$ factorial design. There are two treatments, denoted $A$ and $B$, and units are randomly assigned to one of four categories: treatment $A$ alone, treatment $B$ alone, joint treatment, or none. Allowing for endogenous non-compliance with the two binary instruments representing the intended assignment, as well as unrestricted interference across the two treatments, we derive the…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Semiparametric Discrete Choice Models for Bundles

组合商品选择的半参数离散选择模型

We propose two approaches to estimate semiparametric discrete choice models for bundles. Our first approach is a kernel-weighted rank estimator based on a matching-based identification strategy. We establish its complete asymptotic properties and prove the validity of the nonparametric bootstrap for inference. We then introduce a new multi-index least absolute deviations (LAD) estimator as an alternative, of which the main advantage is its capacity to estimate preference…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Doubly robust estimation and inference for a log-concave counterfactual density

对数凹反事实密度的双重稳健估计与推断

We consider the problem of causal inference based on observational data (or the related missing data problem) with a binary or discrete treatment variable. In that context, we study inference for the counterfactual density functions and contrasts thereof, which can provide more nuanced information than counterfactual means and the average treatment effect. We impose the shape-constraint of log-concavity, a type of unimodality constraint, on the counterfactual densities, and…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Treatment Effect Estimators as Weighted Outcomes

将处理效应估计器表示为加权结局

Estimators that weight observed outcomes to form effect estimates have a long tradition. Their outcome weights are widely used in established procedures, such as checking covariate balance, characterizing target populations, or detecting and managing extreme weights. This paper introduces a general framework for deriving such outcome weights. It establishes when and how numerical equivalence between an original estimator representation as moment condition and a unique…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Doubly-robust inference and optimality in structure-agnostic models with smoothness

带平滑性约束的结构无关模型中的双重稳健推断与最优性

We study the problem of constructing an estimator of the average treatment effect (ATE) with observational data. The celebrated doubly-robust, augmented-IPW (AIPW) estimator generally requires consistent estimation of both nuisance functions for standard root-n inference, and moreover that the product of the errors of the nuisances should shrink at a rate faster than $n^{-1/2}$. A recent strand of research has aimed to understand the extent to which the AIPW estimator can be…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Synthetic Potential Outcomes and Causal Mixture Identifiability

合成潜在结果与因果混合模型的可识别性

Heterogeneous data from multiple populations, sub-groups, or sources is often represented as a ``mixture model'' with a single latent class influencing all of the observed covariates. Heterogeneity can be resolved at multiple levels by grouping populations according to different notions of similarity. This paper proposes grouping with respect to the causal response of an intervention or perturbation on the system. This definition is distinct from previous notions, such as…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Model Selection for Causal Modeling in Missing Exposure Problems

暴露缺失情形下因果建模的模型选择

In causal inference, properly selecting the propensity score (PS) model is an important topic and has been widely investigated in observational studies. There is also a large literature focusing on the missing data problem. However, there are very few studies investigating the model selection issue for causal inference when the exposure is missing at random (MAR). In this paper, we discuss how to select both imputation and PS models, which can result in the smallest root…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Generalized Encouragement-Based Instrumental Variables for Counterfactual Regression

用于反事实回归的广义鼓励型工具变量方法

In causal inference, encouragement designs (EDs) are widely used to analyze causal effects, when randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are impractical or compliance to treatment cannot be perfectly enforced. Unlike RCTs, which directly allocate treatments, EDs randomly assign encouragement policies that positively motivate individuals to engage in a specific treatment. These random encouragements act as instrumental variables (IVs), facilitating the identification of causal…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Supercompliers

超级服从者:同时响应资格与受益于处理的群体

In a binary-treatment instrumental variable framework, we define supercompliers as the subpopulation whose treatment take-up positively responds to eligibility and whose outcome positively responds to take-up. Supercompliers are the only subpopulation to benefit from treatment eligibility and, hence, are important for policy. We provide tools to characterize supercompliers under a set of jointly testable assumptions. Specifically, we require standard assumptions from the…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Identifying Macro Conditional Independencies and Macro Total Effects in Summary Causal Graphs with Latent Confounding

含潜在混杂的汇总因果图中宏观条件独立与总效应的识别

Understanding causal relations in dynamic systems is essential in epidemiology. While causal inference methods have been extensively studied, they often rely on fully specified causal graphs, which may not always be available in complex dynamic systems. Partially specified causal graphs, and in particular summary causal graphs (SCGs), provide a simplified representation of causal relations between time series when working spacio-temporal data, omitting temporal information…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Distributionally Robust Instrumental Variables Estimation

分布鲁棒的工具变量估计

Instrumental variables (IV) estimation is a fundamental method in econometrics and statistics for estimating causal effects in the presence of unobserved confounding. However, challenges such as untestable model assumptions and poor finite sample properties have undermined its reliability in practice. Viewing common issues in IV estimation as distributional uncertainties, we propose DRIVE, a distributionally robust IV estimation method. We show that DRIVE minimizes a square…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Treatment Effects with Multidimensional Unobserved Heterogeneity: Identification of the Marginal Treatment Effect

多维不可观测异质性下的处理效应:边际处理效应识别

This paper establishes sufficient conditions for the identification of the marginal treatment effects with multivalued treatments. Our model is based on a multinomial choice model with utility maximization. Our MTE generalizes the MTE defined in Heckman and Vytlacil (2005) in binary treatment models. As in the binary case, we can interpret the MTE as the treatment effect for persons who are indifferent between two treatments at a particular level. Our MTE enables one to…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

An Adversarial Approach to Identification

识别问题的对抗式方法

We introduce a new framework for characterizing identified sets of structural and counterfactual parameters in econometric models. By reformulating the identification problem as a set membership question, we leverage the separating hyperplane theorem in the space of observed probability measures to characterize the identified set through the zeros of a discrepancy function with an adversarial game interpretation. The set can be a singleton, resulting in point identification.…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Sensitivity Analysis for Quantiles of Hidden Biases in Matched Observational Studies

匹配观察性研究中隐性偏差分位数的敏感性分析

Causal conclusions from observational studies may be sensitive to unmeasured confounding. In such cases, a sensitivity analysis is often conducted, which tries to infer the minimum amount of hidden biases or the minimum strength of unmeasured confounding needed in order to explain away the observed association between treatment and outcome. If the needed bias is large, then the treatment is likely to have significant effects. The Rosenbaum sensitivity analysis is a modern…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Generative Causal Inference

生成式因果推断

Generative Bayesian Computation (GBC) methods are developed for Casual Inference. Generative methods are simulation-based methods that use a large training dataset to represent posterior distributions as a map (a.k.a. optimal transport) to a base distribution. They avoid the use of MCMC by replacing the conditional posterior inference problem with a supervised learning problem. We further propose the use Quantile ReLU networks which are density free and hence apply in a…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓