跳到正文
简报说明

来源与收录范围

汇总期刊目录中的 16 个期刊来源,以及 arXiv 计量经济学与相关统计、金融分类和主题检索中的预印本。期刊题录主要来自 Crossref,可靠摘要保留补充来源;期刊官网链接可在论文检索的说明中核对。

保留计量方法研究、相关统计基础及实质涉及计量方法的应用、教程、比较和综述。待核验、范围外及撤回记录不进入公开简报。基础文献按学习与研究需要单独选编。

此前日简报及周、月简报按可核实的原站发表、首次提交和修订日期归档;历史补录只留在文献库。期刊仅纳入收录当月新发表或提前取得题录的论文;只有月份的记录仅进入对应月简报。arXiv 同期只计一次,首次发布优先;未保存的中间版本无法补算。撤回内容会同步移除;所有历史补录仍可在论文检索中查找。

当前结果:已发表 0 篇 · 待刊 0 篇 · 预印本 108 篇

关键词匹配标题、摘要、作者或 DOI;支持部分字母,多词同时匹配,双引号匹配短语。

本期动态按期刊、arXiv 首次发布、arXiv 修订分组,组内默认本文引用优先。也可选择作者引用优先或最新收录。

期刊论文在前,预印本在后。组内先看本文引用,再看已有明确关联作者的最高累计引用,最后按当前日期顺序排序。

“作者引用”指已有明确关联作者的最高累计引用,不合计共同作者。目前作者指标只来自有身份关联快照的预印本,普通期刊条目可能没有该项数据;本页 0/24 篇有可核验作者指标。

本文引用采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计版本;缺失不记作零。累计引用会随时间积累,可结合近年范围比较;引用数和作者发表经历是阅读线索,不代表论文质量或同行评审状态。

“作者发表记录”展示作者已有论文的可核验发表记录,不证明该预印本已接收或通过同行评审。

正常题录、可靠摘要和引用同步继续;AI 解读依据可靠材料,材料不足时保留待解读状态。

本期 108 篇
导出

arXiv · 本期首次发布

Interpreting Event-Studies from Recent Difference-in-Differences Methods

如何解释近期双重差分方法的事件研究图

This note discusses the interpretation of event-study plots produced by recent difference-in-differences methods. I show that even when specialized to the case of non-staggered treatment timing, the default plots produced by software for several of the most popular recent methods do not match those of traditional two-way fixed effects (TWFE) event-studies. The plots produced by the new methods may show a kink or jump at the time of treatment even when the TWFE event-study…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Who Are We Missing? A Principled Approach to Characterizing the Underrepresented Population

我们遗漏了谁?识别代表性不足人群的系统方法

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) serve as the cornerstone for understanding causal effects, yet extending inferences to target populations presents challenges due to effect heterogeneity and underrepresentation. Our paper addresses the critical issue of identifying and characterizing underrepresented subgroups in RCTs, proposing a novel framework for refining target populations to improve generalizability. We introduce an optimization-based approach, Rashomon Set of…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Functional Linear Non-Gaussian Acyclic Model for Causal Discovery

用于因果发现的函数型线性非高斯无环模型

In causal discovery, non-Gaussianity has been used to characterize the complete configuration of a Linear Non-Gaussian Acyclic Model (LiNGAM), encompassing both the causal ordering of variables and their respective connection strengths. However, LiNGAM can only deal with the finite-dimensional case. To expand this concept, we extend the notion of variables to encompass vectors and even functions, leading to the Functional Linear Non-Gaussian Acyclic Model (Func-LiNGAM). Our…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Dagma-DCE: Interpretable, Non-Parametric Differentiable Causal Discovery

Dagma-DCE:可解释的非参数可微因果发现

We introduce Dagma-DCE, an interpretable and model-agnostic scheme for differentiable causal discovery. Current non- or over-parametric methods in differentiable causal discovery use opaque proxies of ``independence'' to justify the inclusion or exclusion of a causal relationship. We show theoretically and empirically that these proxies may be arbitrarily different than the actual causal strength. Juxtaposed to existing differentiable causal discovery algorithms,…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Multiply Robust Difference-in-Differences Estimation of Causal Effect Curves for Continuous Exposures

连续暴露因果效应曲线的多重稳健双重差分估计

Researchers commonly use difference-in-differences (DiD) designs to evaluate public policy interventions. While methods exist for estimating effects in the context of binary interventions, policies often result in varied exposures across regions implementing the policy. Yet, existing approaches for incorporating continuous exposures face substantial limitations in addressing confounding variables associated with intervention status, exposure levels, and outcome trends. These…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Penalized G-estimation for effect modifier selection in a structural nested mean model for repeated outcomes

重复结果结构嵌套均值模型中效应修饰变量选择的惩罚 G 估计

Effect modification occurs when the impact of the treatment on an outcome varies based on the levels of other covariates known as effect modifiers. Modeling these effect differences is important for etiological goals and for purposes of optimizing treatment. Structural nested mean models (SNMMs) are useful causal models for estimating the potentially heterogeneous effect of a time-varying exposure on the mean of an outcome in the presence of time-varying confounding. A…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Recovery and inference of causal effects with sequential adjustment for confounding and attrition

通过序贯调整混杂与样本流失恢复因果效应并开展推断

Confounding bias and selection bias bring two significant challenges to the validity of conclusions drawn from applied causal inference. The latter can stem from informative missingness, such as in cases of attrition. We introduce the Sequential Adjustment Criteria (SAC), which extend available graphical conditions for recovering causal effects from confounding and attrition using sequential regressions, allowing for the inclusion of post-exposure and forbidden variables in…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

A Bracketing Relationship for Long-Term Policy Evaluation with Combined Experimental and Observational Data

结合实验与观察数据进行长期政策评估的夹逼关系

Combining short-term experimental data with observational data enables credible long-term policy evaluation. The literature offers two key but non-nested assumptions, namely the latent unconfoundedness (LU; Athey et al., 2020) and equi-confounding bias (ECB; Ghassami et al., 2022) conditions, to correct observational selection. Committing to the wrong assumption leads to biased estimation. To mitigate such risks, we provide a novel bracketing relationship (cf. Angrist and…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Entrywise Inference for Missing Panel Data: A Simple and Instance-Optimal Approach

缺失面板数据的逐元素推断:一种简单且实例最优的方法

Longitudinal or panel data can be represented as a matrix with rows indexed by units and columns indexed by time. We consider inferential questions associated with the missing data version of panel data induced by staggered adoption. We propose a computationally efficient procedure for estimation, involving only simple matrix algebra and singular value decomposition, and prove non-asymptotic and high-probability bounds on its error in estimating each missing entry. By…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

How to achieve model-robust inference in stepped wedge trials with model-based methods?

如何用模型方法实现阶梯楔形试验的模型稳健推断?

A stepped wedge design is a unidirectional crossover design where clusters are randomized to distinct treatment sequences. While model-based analysis of stepped wedge designs is standard practice to evaluate treatment effects accounting for clustering and adjusting for covariates, their properties under misspecification have not been systematically explored. In this article, we focus on model-based methods, including linear mixed models and generalized estimating equations…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Multiple Randomization Designs: Estimation and Inference with Interference

多重随机化设计:存在干扰时的估计与推断

Classical designs of randomized experiments, going back to Fisher and Neyman in the 1930s still dominate practice even in online experimentation. However, such designs are of limited value for answering standard questions in settings, common in marketplaces, where multiple populations of agents interact strategically, leading to complex patterns of spillover effects. In this paper, we discuss new experimental designs and corresponding estimands to account for and capture…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Inference for Cumulative Incidences and Treatment Effects in Randomized Controlled Trials with Time-to-Event Outcomes under ICH E9 (R1)

ICH E9(R1)框架下随机试验累积发生率与处理效应的推断

In randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that focus on time-to-event outcomes, intercurrent events can arise in two ways: as semi-competing events, which modify the hazard of the primary outcome events, or as competing events, which make the definition of the primary outcome events unclear. Although five strategies have been proposed in the ICH E9 (R1) addendum to address intercurrent events in RCTs, these strategies are not easily applicable to time-to-event outcomes when…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Inference for Synthetic Controls via Refined Placebo Tests

利用改进安慰剂检验进行合成控制推断

The synthetic control method is often applied to problems with one treated unit and a small number of control units. A common inferential task in this setting is to test null hypotheses regarding the average treatment effect on the treated. Inference procedures that are justified asymptotically are often unsatisfactory due to (1) small sample sizes that render large-sample approximation fragile and (2) simplification of the estimation procedure that is implemented in…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Recanting twins: addressing intermediate confounding in mediation analysis

反悔孪生:处理中介分析中的中间混杂

The presence of intermediate confounders, also called recanting witnesses, is a fundamental challenge to the investigation of causal mechanisms in mediation analysis, preventing the identification of natural path-specific effects. Proposed alternative parameters (such as randomizational interventional effects) are problematic because they can be non-null even when there is no mediation for any individual in the population; i.e., they are not an average of underlying…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

IV Estimation of Panel Data Tobit Models with Normal Errors

正态误差面板 Tobit 模型的工具变量估计

Amemiya (1973) proposed a ``consistent initial estimator'' for the parameters in a censored regression model with normal errors. This paper demonstrates that a similar approach can be used to construct moment conditions for fixed--effects versions of the model considered by Amemiya. This result suggests estimators for models that have not previously been considered.

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Valid causal inference with unobserved confounding in high-dimensional settings

高维环境中存在未观测混杂时的有效因果推断

Various methods have recently been proposed to estimate causal effects with confidence intervals that are uniformly valid over a set of data generating processes when high-dimensional nuisance models are estimated by post-model-selection or machine learning estimators. These methods typically require that all the confounders are observed to ensure identification of the effects. We contribute by showing how valid semiparametric inference can be obtained in the presence of…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Non-collapsibility and Built-in Selection Bias of Hazard Ratio in Randomized Controlled Trials

随机对照试验中风险比的不可折叠性与内生选择偏差

Background: The hazard ratio of the Cox proportional hazards model is widely used in randomized controlled trials to assess treatment effects. However, two properties of the hazard ratio including the non-collapsibility and built-in selection bias need to be further investigated. Methods: We conduct simulations to differentiate the non-collapsibility effect and built-in selection bias from the difference between the marginal and the conditional hazard ratio. Meanwhile, we…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Estimation of the genetic Gaussian network using GWAS summary data

利用 GWAS 汇总数据估计遗传高斯网络

Genetic Gaussian network of multiple phenotypes constructed through the genetic correlation matrix is informative for understanding their biological dependencies. However, its interpretation may be challenging because the estimated genetic correlations are biased due to estimation errors and horizontal pleiotropy inherent in GWAS summary statistics. Here we introduce a novel approach called Estimation of Genetic Graph (EGG), which eliminates the estimation error bias and…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Causal Layering via Conditional Entropy

通过条件熵恢复因果分层

Causal discovery aims to recover information about an unobserved causal graph from the observable data it generates. Layerings are orderings of the variables which place causes before effects. In this paper, we provide ways to recover layerings of a graph by accessing the data via a conditional entropy oracle, when distributions are discrete. Our algorithms work by repeatedly removing sources or sinks from the graph. Under appropriate assumptions and conditioning, we can…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Assumptions and Bounds in the Instrumental Variable Model

工具变量模型中的假设与界限

In this note we give proofs for results relating to the Instrumental Variable (IV) model with binary response $Y$ and binary treatment $X$, but with an instrument $Z$ with $K$ states. These results were originally stated in Richardson & Robins (2014), "ACE Bounds; SEMS with Equilibrium Conditions," arXiv:1410.0470.

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Inverting estimating equations for causal inference on quantiles

通过反演估计方程进行分位数因果推断

The causal inference literature frequently focuses on estimating the mean of the potential outcome, whereas quantiles of the potential outcome may carry important additional information. We propose a unified approach, based on the inverse estimating equations, to generalize a class of causal inference solutions from estimating the mean of the potential outcome to its quantiles. We assume that a moment function is available to identify the mean of the threshold-transformed…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Invariant Causal Prediction with Local Models

使用局部模型的不变因果预测

We consider the task of identifying the causal parents of a target variable among a set of candidates from observational data. Our main assumption is that the candidate variables are observed in different environments which may, under certain assumptions, be regarded as interventions on the observed system. We assume a linear relationship between target and candidates, which can be different in each environment with the only restriction that the causal structure is invariant…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Modular Learning of Deep Causal Generative Models for High-dimensional Causal Inference

面向高维因果推断的深度因果生成模型模块化学习

Sound and complete algorithms have been proposed to compute identifiable causal queries using the causal structure and data. However, most of these algorithms assume accurate estimation of the data distribution, which is impractical for high-dimensional variables such as images. On the other hand, modern deep generative architectures can be trained to sample from high-dimensional distributions. However, training these networks are typically very costly. Thus, it is desirable…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Causal Machine Learning for Moderation Effects

用于调节效应分析的因果机器学习

It is valuable for any decision maker to know the impact of decisions (treatments) on average and for subgroups. The causal machine learning literature has recently provided tools for estimating group average treatment effects (GATE) to better describe treatment heterogeneity. This paper addresses the challenge of interpreting such differences in treatment effects between groups while accounting for variations in other covariates. We propose a new parameter, the balanced…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓