跳到正文
简报说明

来源与收录范围

汇总期刊目录中的 16 个期刊来源,以及 arXiv 计量经济学与相关统计、金融分类和主题检索中的预印本。期刊题录主要来自 Crossref,可靠摘要保留补充来源;期刊官网链接可在论文检索的说明中核对。

保留计量方法研究、相关统计基础及实质涉及计量方法的应用、教程、比较和综述。待核验、范围外及撤回记录不进入公开简报。基础文献按学习与研究需要单独选编。

此前日简报及周、月简报按可核实的原站发表、首次提交和修订日期归档;历史补录只留在文献库。期刊仅纳入收录当月新发表或提前取得题录的论文;只有月份的记录仅进入对应月简报。arXiv 同期只计一次,首次发布优先;未保存的中间版本无法补算。撤回内容会同步移除;所有历史补录仍可在论文检索中查找。

当前结果:已发表 0 篇 · 待刊 0 篇 · 预印本 77 篇

关键词匹配标题、摘要、作者或 DOI;支持部分字母,多词同时匹配,双引号匹配短语。

本期动态按期刊、arXiv 首次发布、arXiv 修订分组,组内默认本文引用优先。也可选择作者引用优先或最新收录。

期刊论文在前,预印本在后。组内先看本文引用,再看已有明确关联作者的最高累计引用,最后按当前日期顺序排序。

“作者引用”指已有明确关联作者的最高累计引用,不合计共同作者。目前作者指标只来自有身份关联快照的预印本,普通期刊条目可能没有该项数据;本页 0/24 篇有可核验作者指标。

本文引用采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计版本;缺失不记作零。累计引用会随时间积累,可结合近年范围比较;引用数和作者发表经历是阅读线索,不代表论文质量或同行评审状态。

“作者发表记录”展示作者已有论文的可核验发表记录,不证明该预印本已接收或通过同行评审。

正常题录、可靠摘要和引用同步继续;AI 解读依据可靠材料,材料不足时保留待解读状态。

本期 77 篇
导出

arXiv · 本期首次发布

Learning Large Causal Structures from Inverse Covariance Matrix via Sparse Matrix Decomposition

通过逆协方差矩阵的稀疏分解学习大型因果结构

Learning causal structures from observational data is a fundamental problem facing important computational challenges when the number of variables is large. In the context of linear structural equation models (SEMs), this paper focuses on learning causal structures from the inverse covariance matrix. The proposed method, called ICID for Independence-preserving Decomposition from Inverse Covariance matrix, is based on continuous optimization of a matrix decomposition model…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Trust Your $\nabla$: Gradient-based Intervention Targeting for Causal Discovery

相信你的梯度:面向因果发现的梯度式干预目标选择

Inferring causal structure from data is a challenging task of fundamental importance in science. Observational data are often insufficient to identify a system's causal structure uniquely. While conducting interventions (i.e., experiments) can improve the identifiability, such samples are usually challenging and expensive to obtain. Hence, experimental design approaches for causal discovery aim to minimize the number of interventions by estimating the most informative…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Empirical Analysis of Model Selection for Heterogeneous Causal Effect Estimation

异质因果效应估计中模型选择的实证分析

We study the problem of model selection in causal inference, specifically for conditional average treatment effect (CATE) estimation. Unlike machine learning, there is no perfect analogue of cross-validation for model selection as we do not observe the counterfactual potential outcomes. Towards this, a variety of surrogate metrics have been proposed for CATE model selection that use only observed data. However, we do not have a good understanding regarding their…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Double Robust Bayesian Inference on Average Treatment Effects

平均处理效应的双重稳健贝叶斯推断

We propose a double robust Bayesian inference procedure on the average treatment effect (ATE) under unconfoundedness. For our new Bayesian approach, we first adjust the prior distributions of the conditional mean functions, and then correct the posterior distribution of the resulting ATE. Both adjustments make use of pilot estimators motivated by the semiparametric influence function for ATE estimation. We prove asymptotic equivalence of our Bayesian procedure and efficient…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Characterization and Greedy Learning of Gaussian Structural Causal Models under Unknown Interventions

未知干预下高斯结构因果模型的刻画与贪心学习

We consider the problem of recovering the causal structure underlying observations from different experimental conditions when the targets of the interventions in each experiment are unknown. We assume a linear structural causal model with additive Gaussian noise and consider interventions that perturb their targets while maintaining the causal relationships in the system. Different models may entail the same distributions, offering competing causal explanations for the…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Inference in Cluster Randomized Trials with Matched Pairs

配对簇随机试验中的推断

This paper studies inference in cluster randomized trials where treatment status is determined according to a "matched pairs" design. Here, by a cluster randomized experiment, we mean one in which treatment is assigned at the level of the cluster; by a "matched pairs" design, we mean that a sample of clusters is paired according to baseline, cluster-level covariates and, within each pair, one cluster is selected at random for treatment. We study the large-sample behavior of…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Bootstraps for Dynamic Panel Threshold Models

动态面板门槛模型的自助推断

This paper develops valid bootstrap inference methods for the dynamic short panel threshold regression. We show that the standard nonparametric bootstrap is inconsistent for the first-differenced generalized method of moments (GMM) estimator. The inconsistency arises from an $n^{1/4}$-consistent non-normal asymptotic distribution of the threshold estimator when the true parameter lies in the continuity region of the parameter space, which stems from the rank deficiency of…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Point estimation for adaptive trial designs II: practical considerations and guidance

自适应试验设计的点估计(二):实践考量与指南

In adaptive clinical trials, the conventional end-of-trial point estimate of a treatment effect is prone to bias, that is, a systematic tendency to deviate from its true value. As stated in recent FDA guidance on adaptive designs, it is desirable to report estimates of treatment effects that reduce or remove this bias. However, it may be unclear which of the available estimators are preferable, and their use remains rare in practice. This paper is the second in a two-part…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

arXiv · 本期修订

A Comparison of Different Methods to Adjust Survival Curves for Confounders

调整生存曲线混杂因素的不同方法比较

Treatment specific survival curves are an important tool to illustrate the treatment effect in studies with time-to-event outcomes. In non-randomized studies, unadjusted estimates can lead to biased depictions due to confounding. Multiple methods to adjust survival curves for confounders exist. However, it is currently unclear which method is the most appropriate in which situation. Our goal is to compare forms of Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting, the G-Formula,…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Synthetic Control As Online Linear Regression

作为在线线性回归的合成控制

This paper notes a simple connection between synthetic control and online learning. Specifically, we recognize synthetic control as an instance of Follow-The-Leader (FTL). Standard results in online convex optimization then imply that, even when outcomes are chosen by an adversary, synthetic control predictions of counterfactual outcomes for the treated unit perform almost as well as an oracle weighted average of control units' outcomes. Synthetic control on differenced data…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Estimating a Causal Exposure Response Function with a Continuous Error-Prone Exposure: A Study of Fine Particulate Matter and All-Cause Mortality

连续暴露测量有误时的因果暴露—反应函数估计:细颗粒物与全因死亡

Numerous studies have examined the associations between long-term exposure to fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and adverse health outcomes. Recently, many of these studies have begun to employ high-resolution predicted PM2.5 concentrations, which are subject to measurement error. Previous approaches for exposure measurement error correction have either been applied in non-causal settings or have only considered a categorical exposure. Moreover, most procedures have failed to…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Doubly Robust Estimation of Local Average Treatment Effects Using Inverse Probability Weighted Regression Adjustment

利用逆概率加权回归调整双重稳健估计局部平均处理效应

We revisit the problem of estimating the local average treatment effect (LATE) and the local average treatment effect on the treated (LATT) when control variables are available, either to render the instrumental variable (IV) suitably exogenous or to improve precision. Unlike previous approaches, our doubly robust (DR) estimation procedures use quasi-likelihood methods weighted by the inverse of the IV propensity score - so-called inverse probability weighted regression…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Quickest Inference of Network Cascades with Noisy Information

噪声信息下网络级联源头的最快推断

We study the problem of estimating the source of a network cascade given a time series of noisy information about the spread. Initially, there is a single vertex affected by the cascade (the source) and the cascade spreads in discrete time steps across the network. The cascade evolution is hidden, but one can observe a time series of noisy signals from each vertex. The time series of a vertex is assumed to be a sequence of i.i.d. samples from a pre-change distribution $Q_0$ b…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Higher-order least squares: assessing partial goodness of fit of linear causal models

高阶最小二乘:评估线性因果模型的局部拟合优度

We introduce a simple diagnostic test for assessing the overall or partial goodness of fit of a linear causal model with errors being independent of the covariates. In particular, we consider situations where hidden confounding is potentially present. We develop a method and discuss its capability to distinguish between covariates that are confounded with the response by latent variables and those that are not. Thus, we provide a test and methodology for partial goodness of…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Debiased Machine Learning without Sample-Splitting for Stable Estimators

稳定估计器下无需样本分割的去偏机器学习

Estimation and inference on causal parameters is typically reduced to a generalized method of moments problem, which involves auxiliary functions that correspond to solutions to a regression or classification problem. Recent line of work on debiased machine learning shows how one can use generic machine learning estimators for these auxiliary problems, while maintaining asymptotic normality and root-$n$ consistency of the target parameter of interest, while only requiring…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

What's the Harm? Sharp Bounds on the Fraction Negatively Affected by Treatment

干预有何伤害?处理导致负面影响的人群比例的锐界

The fundamental problem of causal inference -- that we never observe counterfactuals -- prevents us from identifying how many might be negatively affected by a proposed intervention. If, in an A/B test, half of users click (or buy, or watch, or renew, etc.), whether exposed to the standard experience A or a new one B, hypothetically it could be because the change affects no one, because the change positively affects half the user population to go from no-click to click while…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

What can the millions of random treatments in nonexperimental data reveal about causes?

非实验数据中的数百万随机处理能揭示什么因果信息?

We propose a new method to estimate causal effects from nonexperimental data. Each pair of sample units is first associated with a stochastic 'treatment' - differences in factors between units - and an effect - a resultant outcome difference. It is then proposed that all such pairs can be combined to provide more accurate estimates of causal effects in observational data, provided a statistical model connecting combinatorial properties of treatments to the accuracy and…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Causal aggregation: estimation and inference of causal effects by constraint-based data fusion

因果聚合:基于约束的数据融合与联合干预效应推断

In causal inference, it is common to estimate the causal effect of a single treatment variable on an outcome. However, practitioners may also be interested in the effect of simultaneous interventions on multiple covariates of a fixed target variable. We propose a novel method that allows to estimate the effect of joint interventions using data from different experiments in which only very few variables are manipulated. If there is only little randomized data or no randomized…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Leveraging baseline covariates to analyze small cluster-randomized trials with a rare binary outcome

利用基线协变量分析罕见二元结局的小型整群随机试验

Cluster-randomized trials (CRTs) involve randomizing entire groups of participants -- called clusters -- to treatment arms but are often comprised of a limited or fixed number of available clusters. While covariate adjustment can account for chance imbalances between treatment arms and increase statistical efficiency in individually-randomized trials, analytical methods for individual-level covariate adjustment in small CRTs have received little attention to date. In this…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Statistical Treatment Rules under Social Interaction

社会互动下的统计处理规则

In this paper we study treatment assignment rules in the presence of social interaction. We construct an analytical framework under the anonymous interaction assumption, where the decision problem becomes choosing a treatment fraction. We propose a multinomial empirical success (MES) rule that includes the empirical success rule of Manski (2004) as a special case. We investigate the non-asymptotic bounds of the expected utility based on the MES rule. Finally, we prove that…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Estimating Causal Effects of HIV Prevention Interventions with Interference in Network-based Studies among People Who Inject Drugs

存在网络干扰时注射吸毒人群 HIV 预防干预的因果效应估计

Evaluating causal effects in the presence of interference is challenging in network-based studies of hard-to-reach populations. Like many such populations, people who inject drugs (PWID) are embedded in social networks and often exert influence on others in their network. In our setting, the study design is observational with a non-randomized network-based HIV prevention intervention. Information is available on each participant and their connections that confer possible HIV…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Time Series Causal Link Estimation under Hidden Confounding using Knockoff Interventions

利用 Knockoff 干预估计隐藏混杂下的时间序列因果联系

Latent variables often mask cause-effect relationships in observational data which provokes spurious links that may be misinterpreted as causal. This problem sparks great interest in the fields such as climate science and economics. We propose to estimate confounded causal links of time series using Sequential Causal Effect Variational Autoencoder (SCEVAE) while applying Knockoff interventions. Knockoff variables have the same distribution as the originals and preserve the…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Causal Inference with Truncation-by-Death and Unmeasured Confounding

死亡截断与未测混杂下的因果推断

Clinical studies sometimes encounter truncation by death, rendering outcomes undefined. Statistical analysis based solely on observed survivors may give biased results because the characteristics of survivors differ between treatment groups. By principal stratification, the survivor average causal effect was proposed as a causal estimand defined in always-survivors. However, this estimand is not identifiable when there is unmeasured confounding between the treatment…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Individualized treatment rules under stochastic treatment cost constraints

随机治疗成本约束下的个体化治疗规则

Estimation and evaluation of individualized treatment rules have been studied extensively, but real-world treatment resource constraints have received limited attention in existing methods. We investigate a setting in which treatment is intervened upon based on covariates to optimize the mean counterfactual outcome under treatment cost constraints when the treatment cost is random. In a particularly interesting special case, an instrumental variable corresponding to…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓