跳到正文
简报说明

来源与收录范围

汇总期刊目录中的 16 个期刊来源,以及 arXiv 计量经济学与相关统计、金融分类和主题检索中的预印本。期刊题录主要来自 Crossref,可靠摘要保留补充来源;期刊官网链接可在论文检索的说明中核对。

保留计量方法研究、相关统计基础及实质涉及计量方法的应用、教程、比较和综述。待核验、范围外及撤回记录不进入公开简报。基础文献按学习与研究需要单独选编。

此前日简报及周、月简报按可核实的原站发表、首次提交和修订日期归档;历史补录只留在文献库。期刊仅纳入收录当月新发表或提前取得题录的论文;只有月份的记录仅进入对应月简报。arXiv 同期只计一次,首次发布优先;未保存的中间版本无法补算。撤回内容会同步移除;所有历史补录仍可在论文检索中查找。

当前结果:已发表 0 篇 · 待刊 0 篇 · 预印本 112 篇

关键词匹配标题、摘要、作者或 DOI;支持部分字母,多词同时匹配,双引号匹配短语。

本期动态按期刊、arXiv 首次发布、arXiv 修订分组,组内默认本文引用优先。也可选择作者引用优先或最新收录。

期刊论文在前,预印本在后。组内先看本文引用,再看已有明确关联作者的最高累计引用,最后按当前日期顺序排序。

“作者引用”指已有明确关联作者的最高累计引用,不合计共同作者。目前作者指标只来自有身份关联快照的预印本,普通期刊条目可能没有该项数据;本页 0/24 篇有可核验作者指标。

本文引用采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计版本;缺失不记作零。累计引用会随时间积累,可结合近年范围比较;引用数和作者发表经历是阅读线索,不代表论文质量或同行评审状态。

“作者发表记录”展示作者已有论文的可核验发表记录,不证明该预印本已接收或通过同行评审。

正常题录、可靠摘要和引用同步继续;AI 解读依据可靠材料,材料不足时保留待解读状态。

本期 112 篇
导出

arXiv · 本期首次发布

Spatio-temporal Event Studies for Air Quality Assessment under Cross-sectional Dependence

横截面依赖下空气质量评估的时空事件研究

Event Studies (ES) are statistical tools that assess whether a particular event of interest has caused changes in the level of one or more relevant time series. We are interested in ES applied to multivariate time series characterized by high spatial (cross-sectional) and temporal dependence. We pursue two goals. First, we propose to extend the existing taxonomy on ES, mainly deriving from the financial field, by generalizing the underlying statistical concepts and then…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Rejoinder to discussions on "Instrumental variable estimation of the causal hazard ratio"

对《因果风险比的工具变量估计》讨论的答复

We respond to comments on our paper, titled "Instrumental variable estimation of the causal hazard ratio."

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

The built-in selection bias of hazard ratios formalized

风险比内生选择偏差的形式化分析

It is known that the hazard ratio lacks a useful causal interpretation. Even for data from a randomized controlled trial, the hazard ratio suffers from built-in selection bias as, over time, the individuals at risk in the exposed and unexposed are no longer exchangeable. In this work, we formalize how the observed hazard ratio evolves and deviates from the causal hazard ratio of interest in the presence of heterogeneity of the hazard of unexposed individuals (frailty) and…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Bias of the additive hazard model in the presence of causal effect heterogeneity

因果效应异质性下加性风险模型的偏差

Hazard ratios are prone to selection bias, compromising their use as causal estimands. On the other hand, the hazard difference has been shown to remain unaffected by the selection of frailty factors over time. Therefore, observed hazard differences can be used as an unbiased estimator for the causal hazard differences in the absence of confounding. However, in the presence of effect (on the hazard) heterogeneity, the hazard difference is also affected by selection. In this…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Nonlinear Causal Discovery via Kernel Anchor Regression

基于核锚回归的非线性因果发现

Learning causal relationships is a fundamental problem in science. Anchor regression has been developed to address this problem for a large class of causal graphical models, though the relationships between the variables are assumed to be linear. In this work, we tackle the nonlinear setting by proposing kernel anchor regression (KAR). Beyond the natural formulation using a classic two-stage least square estimator, we also study an improved variant that involves…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Can the potential benefit of individualizing treatment be assessed using trial summary statistics alone?

仅凭试验汇总统计能否评估个体化治疗的潜在收益?

Individualizing treatment assignment can improve outcomes for diseases with patient-to-patient variability in comparative treatment effects. When a clinical trial demonstrates that some patients improve on treatment while others do not, it is tempting to assume that treatment effect heterogeneity exists. However, if variability in response is mainly driven by factors other than treatment, investigating the extent to which covariate data can predict differential treatment…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Spectral Representation Learning for Conditional Moment Models

条件矩模型的谱表示学习

Many problems in causal inference and economics can be formulated in the framework of conditional moment models, which characterize the target function through a collection of conditional moment restrictions. For nonparametric conditional moment models, efficient estimation often relies on preimposed conditions on various measures of ill-posedness of the hypothesis space, which are hard to validate when flexible models are used. In this work, we address this issue by…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Deep Counterfactual Estimation with Categorical Background Variables

类别型背景变量下的深度反事实估计

Referred to as the third rung of the causal inference ladder, counterfactual queries typically ask the "What if ?" question retrospectively. The standard approach to estimate counterfactuals resides in using a structural equation model that accurately reflects the underlying data generating process. However, such models are seldom available in practice and one usually wishes to infer them from observational data alone. Unfortunately, the correct structural equation model is…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Heterogeneous interventional indirect effects with multiple mediators: non-parametric and semi-parametric approaches

多中介异质性干预间接效应:非参数与半参数方法

We propose semi- and non-parametric methods to estimate conditional interventional effects in the setting of two discrete mediators whose causal ordering is unknown. Average interventional indirect effects have been shown to decompose an average treatment effect into a direct effect and interventional indirect effects that quantify effects of hypothetical interventions on mediator distributions. Yet these effects may be heterogeneous across the covariate distribution. We…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Testing the Number of Components in Finite Mixture Normal Regression Model with Panel Data

面板正态有限混合回归模型的成分数量检验

This paper develops the likelihood ratio-based test of the null hypothesis of a M0-component model against an alternative of (M0 + 1)-component model in the normal mixture panel regression by extending the Expectation-Maximization (EM) test of Chen and Li (2009a) and Kasahara and Shimotsu (2015) to the case of panel data. We show that, unlike the cross-sectional normal mixture, the first-order derivative of the density function for the variance parameter in the panel normal…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Transfer Learning for Individual Treatment Effect Estimation

个体处理效应估计的迁移学习

This work considers the problem of transferring causal knowledge between tasks for Individual Treatment Effect (ITE) estimation. To this end, we theoretically assess the feasibility of transferring ITE knowledge and present a practical framework for efficient transfer. A lower bound is introduced on the ITE error of the target task to demonstrate that ITE knowledge transfer is challenging due to the absence of counterfactual information. Nevertheless, we establish…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

A nonparametric relative treatment effect for direct comparisons of censored paired survival outcomes

用于右删失配对生存结局直接比较的非参数相对治疗效应

A very classical problem in statistics is to test the stochastic superiority of one distribution to another. However, many existing approaches are developed for independent samples and, moreover, do not take censored data into account. We develop a new estimand-driven method to compare the effectiveness of two treatments in the context of right-censored survival data with matched pairs. With the help of competing risks techniques, the so-called relative treatment effect is…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Network Synthetic Interventions: A Causal Framework for Panel Data Under Network Interference

网络合成干预:网络干扰下的面板数据因果框架

We propose a generalization of the synthetic controls and synthetic interventions methodology to incorporate network interference. We consider the estimation of unit-specific potential outcomes from panel data in the presence of spillover across units and unobserved confounding. Key to our approach is a novel latent factor model that takes into account network interference and generalizes the factor models typically used in panel data settings. We propose an estimator,…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Asymmetric predictability in causal discovery: an information theoretic approach

因果发现中的预测不对称性:信息论方法

Causal investigations in observational studies pose a great challenge in research where randomized trials or intervention-based studies are not feasible. We develop an information geometric causal discovery and inference framework of "predictive asymmetry". For $(X, Y)$, predictive asymmetry enables assessment of whether $X$ is more likely to cause $Y$ or vice-versa. The asymmetry between cause and effect becomes particularly simple if $X$ and $Y$ are deterministically…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Doubly-robust and heteroscedasticity-aware sample trimming for causal inference

因果推断中兼顾双重稳健与异方差的样本修剪

A popular method for variance reduction in observational causal inference is propensity-based trimming, the practice of removing units with extreme propensities from the sample. This practice has theoretical grounding when the data are homoscedastic and the propensity model is parametric (Yang and Ding, 2018; Crump et al. 2009), but in modern settings where heteroscedastic data are analyzed with non-parametric models, existing theory fails to support current practice. In…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Doubly Robust Proximal Synthetic Controls

双重稳健的近端合成控制

To infer the treatment effect for a single treated unit using panel data, synthetic control methods construct a linear combination of control units' outcomes that mimics the treated unit's pre-treatment outcome trajectory. This linear combination is subsequently used to impute the counterfactual outcomes of the treated unit had it not been treated in the post-treatment period, and used to estimate the treatment effect. Existing synthetic control methods rely on correctly…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Probability of Causation with Sample Selection: A Reanalysis of the Impacts of Jóvenes en Acción on Formality

样本选择下的致因概率:重新分析 Jóvenes en Acción 对正规就业的影响

This paper identifies the probability of causation when there is sample selection. We show that the probability of causation is partially identified for individuals who are always observed regardless of treatment status and derive sharp bounds under three increasingly restrictive sets of assumptions. The first set imposes an exogenous treatment and a monotone sample selection mechanism. To tighten these bounds, the second set also imposes the monotone treatment response…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

SIMPLE-RC: Group Network Inference with Non-Sharp Nulls and Weak Signals

SIMPLE-RC:非尖锐原假设与弱信号下的群组网络推断

Large-scale network inference with uncertainty quantification has important applications in natural, social, and medical sciences. The recent work of Fan, Fan, Han and Lv (2022) introduced a general framework of statistical inference on membership profiles in large networks (SIMPLE) for testing the sharp null hypothesis that a pair of given nodes share the same membership profiles. In real applications, there are often groups of nodes under investigation that may share…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Nonparametric Estimation of Mediation Effects with A General Treatment

一般处理类型下中介效应的非参数估计

To investigate causal mechanisms, causal mediation analysis decomposes the total treatment effect into the natural direct and indirect effects. This paper examines the estimation of the direct and indirect effects in a general treatment effect model, where the treatment can be binary, multi-valued, continuous, or a mixture. We propose generalized weighting estimators with weights estimated by solving an expanding set of equations. Under some sufficient conditions, we show…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Beyond Conditional Averages: Estimating The Individual Causal Effect Distribution

超越条件平均效应:估计个体因果效应分布

In recent years, the field of causal inference from observational data has emerged rapidly. The literature has focused on (conditional) average causal effect estimation. When (remaining) variability of individual causal effects (ICEs) is considerable, average effects may be uninformative for an individual. The fundamental problem of causal inference precludes estimating the joint distribution of potential outcomes without making assumptions. In this work, we show that the…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Causal Effect of Functional Treatment

函数型处理的因果效应

We study the causal effect with a functional treatment variable, where practical applications often arise in neuroscience, biomedical sciences, etc. Previous research concerning the effect of a functional variable on an outcome is typically restricted to exploring correlation rather than causality. The generalized propensity score, which is often used to calibrate the selection bias, is not directly applicable to a functional treatment variable due to a lack of definition of…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Inference on Extreme Quantiles of Unobserved Individual Heterogeneity

不可观测个体异质性极端分位数的统计推断

We develop a methodology for conducting inference on extreme quantiles of unobserved individual heterogeneity (e.g., heterogeneous coefficients, treatment effects) in panel data and meta-analysis settings. Inference is challenging in such settings: only noisy estimates of heterogeneity are available, and central limit approximations perform poorly in the tails. We derive a necessary and sufficient condition under which noisy estimates are informative about extreme quantiles,…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Policy Learning with New Treatments

包含新处理选项的政策学习

I study the problem of a decision maker choosing a policy which allocates treatment to a heterogeneous population on the basis of experimental data that includes only a subset of possible treatment values. The effects of new treatments are partially identified by shape restrictions on treatment response. Policies are compared according to the minimax regret criterion, and I show that the empirical analog of the population decision problem has a tractable linear- and…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

A General Design-Based Framework and Estimator for Randomized Experiments

随机实验的一般设计型框架与估计器

We describe a widely applicable design-based framework for drawing causal inference in randomized experiments. Causal effects are defined as linear functionals evaluated at unit-level potential outcome functions. Assumptions about the potential outcome functions are encoded as function spaces. This makes the framework expressive, allowing experimenters to formulate and investigate a wide range of causal questions that previously could not be investigated with design-based…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓