跳到正文
简报说明

来源与收录范围

汇总期刊目录中的 16 个期刊来源,以及 arXiv 计量经济学与相关统计、金融分类和主题检索中的预印本。期刊题录主要来自 Crossref,可靠摘要保留补充来源;期刊官网链接可在论文检索的说明中核对。

保留计量方法研究、相关统计基础及实质涉及计量方法的应用、教程、比较和综述。待核验、范围外及撤回记录不进入公开简报。基础文献按学习与研究需要单独选编。

此前日简报及周、月简报按可核实的原站发表、首次提交和修订日期归档;历史补录只留在文献库。期刊仅纳入收录当月新发表或提前取得题录的论文;只有月份的记录仅进入对应月简报。arXiv 同期只计一次,首次发布优先;未保存的中间版本无法补算。撤回内容会同步移除;所有历史补录仍可在论文检索中查找。

当前结果:已发表 0 篇 · 待刊 0 篇 · 预印本 74 篇

关键词匹配标题、摘要、作者或 DOI;支持部分字母,多词同时匹配,双引号匹配短语。

本期动态按期刊、arXiv 首次发布、arXiv 修订分组,组内默认本文引用优先。也可选择作者引用优先或最新收录。

期刊论文在前,预印本在后。组内先看本文引用,再看已有明确关联作者的最高累计引用,最后按当前日期顺序排序。

“作者引用”指已有明确关联作者的最高累计引用,不合计共同作者。目前作者指标只来自有身份关联快照的预印本,普通期刊条目可能没有该项数据;本页 0/24 篇有可核验作者指标。

本文引用采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计版本;缺失不记作零。累计引用会随时间积累,可结合近年范围比较;引用数和作者发表经历是阅读线索,不代表论文质量或同行评审状态。

“作者发表记录”展示作者已有论文的可核验发表记录,不证明该预印本已接收或通过同行评审。

正常题录、可靠摘要和引用同步继续;AI 解读依据可靠材料,材料不足时保留待解读状态。

arXiv · 计量与统计方法 同步延迟 · 上次成功10月15日

本期 74 篇
导出

arXiv · 本期首次发布

Causal Machine Learning: A Survey and Open Problems

因果机器学习:综述与开放问题

Causal Machine Learning (CausalML) is an umbrella term for machine learning methods that formalize the data-generation process as a structural causal model (SCM). This perspective enables us to reason about the effects of changes to this process (interventions) and what would have happened in hindsight (counterfactuals). We categorize work in CausalML into five groups according to the problems they address: (1) causal supervised learning, (2) causal generative modeling, (3)…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Using modified intention-to-treat as a principal stratum estimator for failure to initiate treatment

将排除未启动治疗者的修正意向治疗分析解释为主层估计

Background: A common intercurrent event affecting many trials is when some participants do not begin their assigned treatment. Many trials use a modified intention-to-treat (mITT) approach, whereby participants who do not initiate treatment are excluded from the analysis. However, it is not clear the estimand being targeted by such an approach or the assumptions necessary for it to be unbiased. Methods: We demonstrate that a mITT analysis which excludes participants who do…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

DoWhy-GCM: An extension of DoWhy for causal inference in graphical causal models

DoWhy-GCM:用于图因果模型推断的 DoWhy 扩展

We present DoWhy-GCM, an extension of the DoWhy Python library, which leverages graphical causal models. Unlike existing causality libraries, which mainly focus on effect estimation, DoWhy-GCM addresses diverse causal queries, such as identifying the root causes of outliers and distributional changes, attributing causal influences to the data generating process of each node, or diagnosis of causal structures. With DoWhy-GCM, users typically specify cause-effect relations via…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Assessing Omitted Variable Bias when the Controls are Endogenous

控制变量存在内生关联时的遗漏变量偏误评估

Omitted variables are one of the most important threats to the identification of causal effects. Several widely used methods assess the impact of omitted variables on empirical conclusions by comparing measures of selection on observables with measures of selection on unobservables. The recent literature has discussed various limitations of these existing methods, however. This includes challenges that arise when the omitted variables are endogenous, meaning that they are…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Estimating and Mitigating the Congestion Effect of Curbside Pick-ups and Drop-offs: A Causal Inference Approach

路边上下客拥堵效应的估计与缓解:因果推断方法

Curb space is one of the busiest areas in urban road networks. Especially in recent years, the rapid increase of ride-hailing trips and commercial deliveries has induced massive pick-ups/drop-offs (PUDOs), which occupy the limited curb space that was designed and built decades ago. These PUDOs could jam curbside utilization and disturb the mainline traffic flow, evidently leading to significant negative societal externalities. However, there is a lack of an analytical…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Markovian Interference in Experiments

实验中的马尔可夫式干扰

We consider experiments in dynamical systems where interventions on some experimental units impact other units through a limiting constraint (such as a limited inventory). Despite outsize practical importance, the best estimators for this `Markovian' interference problem are largely heuristic in nature, and their bias is not well understood. We formalize the problem of inference in such experiments as one of policy evaluation. Off-policy estimators, while unbiased,…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Soft calibration for selection bias problems under mixed-effects models

混合效应模型下选择偏差问题的软校准

Calibration weighting has been widely used to correct selection biases in non-probability sampling, missing data, and causal inference. The main idea is to calibrate the biased sample to the benchmark by adjusting the subject weights. However, hard calibration can produce enormous weights when an exact calibration is enforced on a large set of extraneous covariates. This article proposes a soft calibration scheme, in which the outcome and the selection indicator follow…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

What Makes Forest-Based Heterogeneous Treatment Effect Estimators Work?

森林型异质性处理效应估计为何有效?

Estimation of heterogeneous treatment effects (HTE) is of prime importance in many disciplines, ranging from personalized medicine to economics among many others. Random forests have been shown to be a flexible and powerful approach to HTE estimation in both randomized trials and observational studies. In particular "causal forests", introduced by Athey, Tibshirani and Wager (2019), along with the R implementation in package grf were rapidly adopted. A related approach,…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Benchmarking Heterogeneous Treatment Effect Models through the Lens of Interpretability

从可解释性视角评测异质性处理效应模型

Estimating personalized effects of treatments is a complex, yet pervasive problem. To tackle it, recent developments in the machine learning (ML) literature on heterogeneous treatment effect estimation gave rise to many sophisticated, but opaque, tools: due to their flexibility, modularity and ability to learn constrained representations, neural networks in particular have become central to this literature. Unfortunately, the assets of such black boxes come at a cost: models…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Causal Discovery for Fairness

面向公平性分析的因果发现

It is crucial to consider the social and ethical consequences of AI and ML based decisions for the safe and acceptable use of these emerging technologies. Fairness, in particular, guarantees that the ML decisions do not result in discrimination against individuals or minorities. Identifying and measuring reliably fairness/discrimination is better achieved using causality which considers the causal relation, beyond mere association, between the sensitive attribute (e.g.…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Active Bayesian Causal Inference

主动贝叶斯因果推断

Causal discovery and causal reasoning are classically treated as separate and consecutive tasks: one first infers the causal graph, and then uses it to estimate causal effects of interventions. However, such a two-stage approach is uneconomical, especially in terms of actively collected interventional data, since the causal query of interest may not require a fully-specified causal model. From a Bayesian perspective, it is also unnatural, since a causal query (e.g., the…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

BaCaDI: Bayesian Causal Discovery with Unknown Interventions

BaCaDI:干预目标未知时的贝叶斯因果发现

Inferring causal structures from experimentation is a central task in many domains. For example, in biology, recent advances allow us to obtain single-cell expression data under multiple interventions such as drugs or gene knockouts. However, the targets of the interventions are often uncertain or unknown and the number of observations limited. As a result, standard causal discovery methods can no longer be reliably used. To fill this gap, we propose a Bayesian framework…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Estimating counterfactual treatment outcomes over time in complex multiagent scenarios

复杂多智能体场景中随时间变化的反事实处理结果估计

Evaluation of intervention in a multiagent system, e.g., when humans should intervene in autonomous driving systems and when a player should pass to teammates for a good shot, is challenging in various engineering and scientific fields. Estimating the individual treatment effect (ITE) using counterfactual long-term prediction is practical to evaluate such interventions. However, most of the conventional frameworks did not consider the time-varying complex structure of…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Debiased Machine Learning without Sample-Splitting for Stable Estimators

稳定估计器下无需样本分割的去偏机器学习

Estimation and inference on causal parameters is typically reduced to a generalized method of moments problem, which involves auxiliary functions that correspond to solutions to a regression or classification problem. Recent line of work on debiased machine learning shows how one can use generic machine learning estimators for these auxiliary problems, while maintaining asymptotic normality and root-$n$ consistency of the target parameter of interest, while only requiring…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Estimating Causal Effects Under Image Confounding Bias with an Application to Poverty in Africa

图像混杂偏差下的因果效应估计及非洲贫困应用

Observational studies of causal effects require adjustment for confounding factors. In the tabular setting, where these factors are well-defined, separate random variables, the effect of confounding is well understood. However, in public policy, ecology, and in medicine, decisions are often made in non-tabular settings, informed by patterns or objects detected in images (e.g., maps, satellite or tomography imagery). Using such imagery for causal inference presents an…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Treatment Effect Estimation with Observational Network Data using Machine Learning

利用机器学习估计观测网络数据中的处理效应

Causal inference methods for treatment effect estimation usually assume independent units. However, this assumption is often questionable because units may interact, resulting in spillover effects between them. We develop augmented inverse probability weighting (AIPW) for estimation and inference of the expected average treatment effect (EATE) with observational data from a single (social) network with spillover effects. In contrast to overall effects such as the global…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Debiased Machine Learning U-statistics

基于机器学习的去偏 U 统计量

We propose a method to debias estimators based on U-statistics with machine-learning (ML) first steps. Standard plug-in estimators often suffer from regularization and model-selection biases, leading to invalid inference. We characterize orthogonal adjustment terms for two-step U-statistics, construct Debiased Machine Learning (DML) U-estimators, develop a cross-fitting algorithm, and establish a general asymptotic theory for inference with ML first steps. We illustrate the…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Randomization Inference Tests for Shift-Share Designs

Shift-Share 设计的随机化推断检验

We consider the problem of inference in shift-share research designs. The choice between existing approaches that allow for unrestricted spatial correlation involves tradeoffs, varying in terms of their validity when there are relatively few or concentrated shocks, and in terms of the assumptions on the shock assignment process and treatment effects heterogeneity. We propose alternative randomization inference methods that combine the advantages of different approaches.…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Causal Inference with Treatment Measurement Error: A Nonparametric Instrumental Variable Approach

处理变量存在测量误差时的因果推断:非参数工具变量方法

We propose a kernel-based nonparametric estimator for the causal effect when the cause is corrupted by error. We do so by generalizing estimation in the instrumental variable setting. Despite significant work on regression with measurement error, additionally handling unobserved confounding in the continuous setting is non-trivial: we have seen little prior work. As a by-product of our investigation, we clarify a connection between mean embeddings and characteristic…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Nonparametric identification of causal effects in clustered observational studies with differential selection

差异性选择下聚类观察研究因果效应的非参数识别

The clustered observational study (COS) design is the observational study counterpart to the clustered randomized trial. In a COS, a treatment is assigned to intact groups, and all units within the group are exposed to the treatment. However, the treatment is non-randomly assigned. COSs are common in both education and health services research. In education, treatments may be given to all students within some schools but withheld from all students in other schools. In health…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Causal Discovery in Heterogeneous Environments Under the Sparse Mechanism Shift Hypothesis

稀疏机制变化假说下异质环境中的因果发现

Machine learning approaches commonly rely on the assumption of independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) data. In reality, however, this assumption is almost always violated due to distribution shifts between environments. Although valuable learning signals can be provided by heterogeneous data from changing distributions, it is also known that learning under arbitrary (adversarial) changes is impossible. Causality provides a useful framework for modeling distribution…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Power analyses for stepped wedge designs with multivariate continuous outcomes

多元连续结局阶梯楔形设计的功效分析

Multivariate outcomes are common in pragmatic cluster randomized trials. While sample size calculation procedures for multivariate outcomes exist under parallel assignment, none have been developed for a stepped wedge design. In this article, we present computationally efficient power and sample size procedures for stepped wedge cluster randomized trials (SW-CRTs) with multivariate outcomes that differentiate the within-period and between-period intracluster correlation…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Targeted learning in observational studies with multi-valued treatments: An evaluation of antipsychotic drug treatment safety

多值处理观察性研究中的目标学习:抗精神病药物治疗安全性评估

We investigate estimation of causal effects of multiple competing (multi-valued) treatments in the absence of randomization. Our work is motivated by an intention-to-treat study of the relative cardiometabolic risk of assignment to one of six commonly prescribed antipsychotic drugs in a cohort of nearly 39,000 adults with serious mental illnesses. Doubly-robust estimators, such as targeted minimum loss-based estimation (TMLE), require correct specification of either the…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Causal inference in multi-cohort studies using the target trial framework to identify and minimize sources of bias

使用目标试验框架识别并减少多队列研究中的偏差

Longitudinal cohort studies, which follow a group of individuals over time, provide the opportunity to examine causal effects of complex exposures on long-term health outcomes. Utilizing data from multiple cohorts has the potential to add further benefit by improving precision of estimates through data pooling and by allowing examination of effect heterogeneity through replication of analyses across cohorts. However, the interpretation of findings can be complicated by…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓