每日简报

基于最优传输的稳定因果估计AI 解读

In observational studies, the overlap assumption, also called positivity, is frequently strained in practice. Limited overlap destabilizes widely used estimators such as inverse propensity weighting (IPW), whose variance depends on density ratios that explode as propensity scores approach zero or one. To address this challenge, we propose the Stable Transport Estimator (STE), an optimal transport-based approach for estimating average causal effects when overlap holds but…

社会网络数据中处理效应的识别与估计：当社会连接存在混杂时AI 解读

In observational network data, the adoption of a treatment and the formation of social ties often depend on the same characteristics that affect outcomes. We propose a generalized propensity score for each unit's effective treatment, built from a model for treatment assignment and a dyadic model for network formation, which may include latent node heterogeneity. The score is marginalized over the network given covariates rather than conditioned on the realized network, and…

随机试验的比较：试验参与效应与效应迁移AI 解读

Disagreements between randomized trials that address the same causal question pose challenges for the interpretation and synthesis of evidence. We sketch a causal framework for comparing the results of randomized trials that explicitly accommodates the possibility of trial engagement effects. Using counterfactual outcomes defined under joint interventions on treatment assignment and trial-related actions, we compare trial-native treatment effects with the effects transported…

重尾模型中的基于比率的因果发现AI 解读

In many complex systems, such as river networks and financial markets, extreme events propagate from causes to their effects, and the largest observations carry the most information about the underlying causal structure. Existing methods for causal discovery in extremes, however, are tailored to specific mechanisms, such as linear or max-linear models. This work develops causal discovery for heavy-tailed homogeneous structural causal models, a flexible class that contains…

记录链接存在歧义时的随机实验AI 解读

Randomized experiments are often linked to administrative data to measure outcomes, but coarse identifiers can leave multiple administrative records consistent with each experimental unit. We show that unbiased estimation of the sample average treatment effect is possible without resolving these ambiguous links or specifying an outcome model. Our key linkage requirement is that the true administrative outcome is contained among the candidate outcomes for each experimental…