跳到正文
简报说明

来源与收录范围

汇总期刊目录中的 16 个期刊来源,以及 arXiv 计量经济学与相关统计、金融分类和主题检索中的预印本。期刊题录主要来自 Crossref,可靠摘要保留补充来源;期刊官网链接可在论文检索的说明中核对。

保留计量方法研究、相关统计基础及实质涉及计量方法的应用、教程、比较和综述。待核验、范围外及撤回记录不进入公开简报。基础文献按学习与研究需要单独选编。

此前日简报及周、月简报按可核实的原站发表、首次提交和修订日期归档;历史补录只留在文献库。期刊仅纳入收录当月新发表或提前取得题录的论文;只有月份的记录仅进入对应月简报。arXiv 同期只计一次,首次发布优先;未保存的中间版本无法补算。撤回内容会同步移除;所有历史补录仍可在论文检索中查找。

当前结果:已发表 0 篇 · 待刊 0 篇 · 预印本 6 篇

关键词匹配标题、摘要、作者或 DOI;支持部分字母,多词同时匹配,双引号匹配短语。

本期动态按期刊、arXiv 首次发布、arXiv 修订分组,组内默认本文引用优先。也可选择作者引用优先或最新收录。

期刊论文在前,预印本在后。组内先看本文引用,再看已有明确关联作者的最高累计引用,最后按当前日期顺序排序。

“作者引用”指已有明确关联作者的最高累计引用,不合计共同作者。目前作者指标只来自有身份关联快照的预印本,普通期刊条目可能没有该项数据;本页 6/6 篇有可核验作者指标。

本文引用采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计版本;缺失不记作零。累计引用会随时间积累,可结合近年范围比较;引用数和作者发表经历是阅读线索,不代表论文质量或同行评审状态。

“作者发表记录”展示作者已有论文的可核验发表记录,不证明该预印本已接收或通过同行评审。

正常题录、可靠摘要和引用同步继续;AI 解读依据可靠材料,材料不足时保留待解读状态。

本期 6 篇
导出

arXiv · 本期首次发布

Transporting summary measures of relative effects from randomised trials to the treated patient population: an application to breast cancer endocrine therapy

将随机试验的相对效应汇总量迁移至已治疗患者:乳腺癌内分泌治疗应用

Randomised trials often report relative treatment effects, such as risk ratios and hazard ratios, for trial populations. Clinical decision-making, however, often benefits from estimates of absolute treatment effects in the population eligible for treatment. Trial participants may not represent this target population well, and restrictions on access to individual participant trial data can further complicate absolute effect estimation. Routine care data are often…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

A Stochastic Nested Fixed Point Algorithm for Large-Scale BLP Estimation

大规模BLP估计的随机嵌套不动点算法

We develop a stochastic nested fixed point (SNFP) estimator for random coefficients logit demand models that updates model parameters using stochastic gradients and performs demand inversion one market at a time. Relative to the conventional nested fixed point (NFP) estimator, SNFP substantially reduces memory requirements and computational cost, making estimation feasible in very large datasets. We establish the large-$T$ (number of markets) asymptotic properties of the…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

arXiv · 本期修订

Long Story Short: Omitted Variable Bias in Causal Machine Learning

长话短说:因果机器学习中的遗漏变量偏误

We develop a general theory of omitted variable bias for a wide range of common causal parameters, including (but not limited to) averages of potential outcomes, average treatment effects, average causal derivatives, and policy effects from covariate shifts. Our theory applies to nonparametric models, while naturally allowing for (semi-)parametric restrictions (such as partial linearity) when such assumptions are made. We show how simple plausibility judgments on the maximum…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Causal Vaccine Effects on Post-infection Outcomes in the Naturally Infected

自然感染人群中疫苗对感染后结局的因果效应

Understanding vaccine effects on post-infection outcomes is critical for evaluating the full value proposition of a vaccine. However, defining appropriate causal effects on such outcomes is challenging because infection is affected by vaccination. Existing approaches focus on the Doomed stratum, individuals who would be infected regardless of vaccine receipt. For many relevant outcomes, however, this estimand understates vaccine benefit by excluding individuals whose adverse…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Testing for Monotone Equilibrium Strategies in Games of Incomplete Information

不完全信息博弈中单调均衡策略的检验

This paper develops a unified framework for testing monotonicity of Bayesian Nash equilibrium strategies in unobserved types in games of incomplete information. We show that, under symmetric independent private types, monotonicity of differentiable equilibrium strategies is equivalent to monotonicity of a quasi-inverse strategy identified from observed actions. This allows the problem to be reformulated as testing a countable set of moment inequalities involving…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Inverse Confounding Analysis: An Exact Method for Quantifying the Significance of Confounding

逆向混杂分析:精确量化混杂影响

The presence of unmeasured confounding factors during the collection of observational data may lead to biased estimates of the effect of an exposure on an outcome. Consequently, a central problem in causal inference based on observational data is sensitivity analysis with respect to unmeasured confounding. Existing sensitivity analyses generally focus on worst-case bounds. We propose an exact method for quantifying the significance of confounding, defined here in terms of…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓