Best for which estimand? A known-truth benchmark of longitudinal-matching and target-trial-emulation methods for time-varying treatments
对哪个目标量最好?时变处理的纵向匹配与目标试验模拟已知真值基准
On a non-collapsible survival mechanism, longitudinal-matching and target-trial-emulation methods are not competing estimators of one truth but answers to different causal questions, so a benchmark that scores them against a single "true hazard ratio" fabricates bias. We provide the direct comparison of relative efficiency, variance estimation, and model sensitivity that reviews find lacking. On a deliberately non-collapsible continuous-time Cox mechanism with known truth,…